, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 779–795 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal variations of photosynthetic parameters in relation to environmental conditions in coastal waters of the Northern Gulf of Mexico

  • Steven E. Lohrenz
  • Gary L. Fahnenstiel
  • Donald G. Redalje


On a series of eight cruises conducted in the northern Gulf of Mexico, efforts were made to characterize temporal and spatial variability in parameters of the photosynthesis-irradiance saturation curve (P mas B , αB, Ik) and to relate the observed variations to environmental conditions. Experiments to examine the importance of diel variation in upper mixed layer populations were conducted in July–August 1990 and March 1991. During July–August 1990, P max B and Ik showed significant increases and αB decreased during the photoperiod in both river plume and shelf-slope populations. During March 1991, no consistent covariance of P-I parameters with local time was found, although highest values of αB in the river plume were observed in early morning. Seasonal variation in P max B and αB were correlated with temperature. Spatial variations of photosynthetic parameters in the upper mixed layer ranged from twofold to threefold within any given cruise. Variations of photosynthetic parameters in the upper mixed layer were related to principal components derived from environmental variables, including temperature, salinity, nutrients, mixed layer depth, attenuation coefficient, and daily photosynthetically available radiation (PAR). Greater than 70% of the variation in the environmental variables could be accounted for by two principal components; the majority of this variation was associated with the first principal component, which was generally strongly correlated with salinity, nutrients, mixed layer depth, and attenuation coefficient. Correlations of P max B , αB, and Ik with the first principal component were found to be significant in some cases, an indication that spatial variability in P-I parameters was related to river outflow. Variation of P-I parameters in relation to depth and PAR were evaluated by regressions with principal components derived from depth, temperature, and mean daily PAR. For most cruises, P max B and Ik were negatively correlated with the first principal component, which was strongly positively correlated with depth and negatively correlated with daily PAR. This was consistent with a decrease in both P max B and Ik with depth that could be related to decreasing daily PAR. Positive correlations of αB with the first principal component for two cruises, March 1991 and April 1992, indicated an increasing trend with depth. In conclusion, relationships between P-I parameters and environmental variables in the region of study were significant in some cases, but variation between cruises made it difficult to generalize. We attributed this variation to the physically dynamic characteristics of the region and the possible effects of variables that were not included in the analysis such as species composition. Our findings do support the view that a limited set of observations may be adequate to characterize P-I parameter distributions in a given region within a restricted period of time.


Phytoplankton Mixed Layer Mixed Layer Depth Photosynthetic Parameter Marine Ecology Progress Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bannister, T. T. andA. D. Weidemann. 1984. The maximum quantum yield of phytoplankton photosynthesis in situ.Journal of Plankton Research 6:275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendel, R. B. andA. A. Afifi. 1977. Comparison of stopping rules in forward “stepwise” regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association 72:46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cote, B. andT. Platt. 1983. Day-to-day variations in the spring-summer photosynthetic parameters of coastal marine phytoplankton.Limnology and Oceanography 28:320–344.Google Scholar
  4. Cullen, J. J. andM. R. Lewis. 1988. The kinetics of algal photoadaptation in the context of vertical mixing.Journal of Plankton Research 10:1039–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cullen, J. J. 1990. On the models of growth and photosynthesis in phytoplankton.Deep-Sea Research 37:667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cullen, J. J., X. Yang, andH. L. MacIntyre. 1992. Nutrient limitation of marine photosynthesis, p. 69–88.In P. G. Falkowski and A. Woodhead (eds.), Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Dortch, Q., D. Milsted, N. N. Rabalais, S. E. Lohrenz, D. G. Redalje, M. J. Dagg, R. E. Turner, andT. E. Whitledge. 1992. Role of silicate availability in phytoplankton species composition and the fate of carbon, p. 76–83.In Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity. Publication Number TAMU-SG-92-109, Sea Grant Program, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas.Google Scholar
  8. Dubinsky, Z. 1992. The functional and optical absorption cross-sections of phytoplankton photosynthesis, p. 31–45.In P. G. Falkowski and A. Woodhead (eds.), Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Eppley, R. W. 1972. Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea.Fishery Bulletin 70:1063–1085.Google Scholar
  10. Fahnenstiel, G. L., D. G. Redalje, S. E. Lohrenz, M. H. Marcowitz, M. J. McCormick, H. J. Carrick, andM. J. Dagg. 1992. High growth and microzooplankton-grazing loss rates for phytoplankton populations from the Mississippi River plume region, p. 111–116.In Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity. Publication Number TAMU-SG-91-109, Sea Grant Program, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas.Google Scholar
  11. Falkowski, P. G. 1981. Light-shade adaptation and assimilation numbers.Journal of Plankton Research 3:203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falkowski, P. G. 1984. Physiological responses of phytoplankton to natural light regimes.Journal of Plankton Research 6:295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falkowski, P. G. 1992. Molecular ecology of phytoplankton photosynthesis, p. 47–67.In P. G. Falkowski and A. Woodhead (eds.), Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Fee, E. J. 1973a. A numerical model for determining integral primary production and its application to Lake Michigan.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30:1447–1468.Google Scholar
  15. Fee, E. J. 1973b. Modelling primary production in water bodies: A numerical approach that allows vertical inhomogeneities.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30:1469–1473.Google Scholar
  16. Fee, E. J., R. E. Hecky, andH. A. Welch. 1987. Phytoplankton photosynthesis parameters in central Canadian lakes.Journal of Plankton Research 9:305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzwater, S. E., G. A. Knauer, andJ. H. Martin. 1982. Metal contamination and its effect on primary production measurements.Limnology and Oceanography 27:544–551.Google Scholar
  18. Gallegos, C. L. 1992. Phytoplankton photosynthesis, productivity, and species composition in a eutrophic estuary: Comparison of bloom and non-bloom assemblages.Marine Ecology Progress Series 81:257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geider, R. J., T. Platt, andJ. A. Raven. 1986. Size dependence of growth and photosynthesis in diatoms: A synthesis.Marine Ecology Progress Series 30:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gonzales-Morales, A. T., G. Gaxiola-Castro, andJ. R. Laralara. 1993. Daily photosynthetic parameters and biomass from size-fractionated phytoplankton off Baja California.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 36:147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harding, L. W., Jr.,B. W. Meeson, B. B. Prezelin, andB. M. Sweeney. 1981. Diel periodicity of photosynthesis in marine phytoplankton.Marine Biology 61:95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding, L. W., Jr.,B. B. Prezelin, B. M. Sweeney, andJ. L. Cox. 1982. Diel oscillations of the photosynthesis-irradiance (P-I) relationship in natural assemblages of phytoplankton.Marine Biology 67:167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harding, L. W., Jr.,B. W. Meeson, andT. R. Fisher, Jr. 1985. Photosynthesis patterns in Chesapeake Bay phytoplankton: Short- and long-term responses of P-I curve parameters to light.Marine Ecology Progress Series 26:99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, W. G. andT. Platt. 1980. Variation in assimilation number of coastal marine phytoplankton: Effects of environmental co-variates.Journal of Plankton Research 2:249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, W. G. andT. Platt. 1986. Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships in polar and temperature phytoplankton populations.Polar Biology 5:153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, W. G., T. Platt, andM. r. Lewis. 1985. The utility of light-saturation models for estimating marine primary productivity in the field: A comparison with conventional “simulated” in situ methods.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:864–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holm-Hansen, O., C. J. Lorenzen, R. W. Holmes, andJ. D. H. Strickland. 1965. Fluorometric determination of chlorophyll.Journal du Conseil Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 30:3–15.Google Scholar
  28. Jassby, A. D. andT. Platt. 1976. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton.Limnology and Oceanography 21:540–547.Google Scholar
  29. Kana, T. M., J. L. Watts, andP. M. Gilbert 1985. Diel periodicity in the photosynthetic capacity of coastal and offshore phytoplankton assemblages.Marine Ecology Progress Series 25: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller, A. 1989. Modeling effects of temperature, light, and nutrients on primary productivity, an empirical and a mechanistic approach compared.Limnology and Oceanography 34: 82–96.Google Scholar
  31. Knauer, G. A. andJ. H. Martin. 1983. Trace elements and primary production, p. 825–840.In C. S. Wong, E. Boyle, K. W. Bruland, J. D. Burton, and E. D. Goldberg (eds.), Trace Elements in Seawater. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Kolber, Z., J. Zehr, andP. Falkowski. 1988. Effects of growth irradiance and nitrogen limitation on photosynthetic energy conversion in photosystem II.Plant Physiology 88:923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolber, Z. andP. G. Falkowski. 1993. Use of active fluorescence to estimate phytoplankton photosynthesis in situ.Limnology and Oceanography 38:1646–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lean, D. R. S. andB. K. Burnison. 1979. An evaluation of errors in the14C method of primary production measurement.Limnology and Oceanography 24:917–928.Google Scholar
  35. Lewis, M. R. andJ. C. Smith. 1983. A small volume, short-incubation-time method for measurement of photosynthesis as a function of incident irradiance.Marine Ecology Progress Series 13:99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ley, A. C. andD. C. Mauzerall. 1982. Absolute absorption cross-sections for photosystem II and the minimum quantum requirement for photosynthesis inChlorella vulgaris.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 680:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lohrenz, S. E., M. J. Dagg, andT. E. Whitledge. 1990. Enhanced primary production at the plume/oceanic interface of the Mississippi River.Continental Shelf Research 10:639–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lohrenz, S. E., G. L. Fahnenstiel, D. G. Redalje, andG. Lang. 1992a. Regulation and distribution of primary production in the northern Gulf of Mexico, p. 95–104.In Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity. Publication Number TAMU-SG-92-109, Sea Grant Program, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas.Google Scholar
  39. Lohrenz, S. E., D. A. Wiesenburg, C. R. Rein, R. A. Arnone, C. D. Taylor, G. A. Knauer, andA. H. Knap. 1992b. A comparison of in situ and simulated in situ methods for estimating oceanic primary production.Journal of Plankton Research 14: 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacCaull, W. A. andT. Platt. 1977. Diel variations in the photosynthetic parameters of coastal marine phytoplankton.Limnology and Oceanography 22:723–731.Google Scholar
  41. Malone, T. C. 1971a. The relative importance of netplankton and nanoplankton as primary producers in neritic and oceanic tropical waters.Limnology and Oceanography 16:633–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malone, T. C. 1971b. The relative importance of nanoplankton and netplankton as primary producers in the California Current system.Fishery Bulletin 69:799–820.Google Scholar
  43. Malone, T. C. andP. J. Neale. 1981. Parameters of light-dependent photosynthesis for phytoplankton size fractions in temperate estuarine and coastal environments.Marine Biology 61:289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neale, P. J. andJ. Marra. 1985. Short-term variation of Pmax under natural irradiance conditions: A model and its implications.Marine Ecology Progress Series 26:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennock, J. R. andJ. H. Sharp. 1986. Phytoplankton production in the Delaware estuary: Temporal and spatial variability.Marine Ecology Progress Series 34:143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Platt, T., C. L. Gallegos, andW. G. Harrison. 1980. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton.Journal of Marine Research 38:687–701.Google Scholar
  47. Platt, T. andA. D. Jassby. 1976. The relationship between photosynthesis and light for natural assemblages of coastal marine phytoplankton.Journal of Phycology 12:421–430.Google Scholar
  48. Platt, T. andS. Sathyendranath. 1988. Oceanic primary production, estimation by remote sensing at local and regional scales.Science 241:1613–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Platt, T., D. V. Subba Rao, andB. Irwin. 1983. Photosynthesis of picoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean.Nature 300:702–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prasad, K. S., S. E. Lohrenz, D. G. Redalje, and G. L. Fahnenstiel. (in press) Primary production in the Gulf of Mexico coastal waters using “remotely-sensed” trophic category approach.Continental Shelf Research.Google Scholar
  51. Redalje, D. G. 1983. Phytoplankton carbon biomass and specific growth rates determined with the labeled chlorophylla technique.Marine Ecology Progress Series 11:217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Redalje, D. G. 1993. The labeled chlorophylla technique for determining photoautotrophic carbon specific growth rates and carbon biomass, p. 563–572.In P. F. Kemp, B. F. Sherr, E. B. Sherr, and J. J. Cole (eds.) Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  53. Redalje, D. G. andE. A. Laws. 1981. A new method for estimating phytoplankton growth rates and carbon biomass.Marine Biology 62:73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Redalje, D. G., S. E. Lohrenz, andG. L. Fahnenstiel. 1992. The relationship between primary production and the export and inner Gulf of Mexico shelf regions, p. 105–110.In Nutrient Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity. Publication Number TAMU-SG-92-109, Sea Grant Program, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas.Google Scholar
  55. Redalje, D. G., S. E. Lohrenz, andG. L. Fahnenstiel. 1994. The relationship between primary production and the vertical coastal ecosystem.Estuaries 17:829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Riley, G. A. 1937. The significance of the Mississippi River drainage for biological conditions in the northern Gulf of Mexico.Journal of Marine Research 1:60–74.Google Scholar
  57. Shoaf, W. T. andB. W. Lium. 1976. Improved extraction of chlorophylla andb from algae using dimethyl sulfoxide.Limnology and Oceanography 21:926–928.Google Scholar
  58. Sukenik, A., J. Bennett, andP. Falkowski. 1987. Light-saturated photosynthesis—Limitation by electron transport or carbon fixation?Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 891:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Talling, J. F. 1957. Photosynthetic characteristics of some freshwater plankton diatoms in relation to underwater radiation.New Phytologist 56:29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas, W. H. andE. G. Simmons. 1960. Phytoplankton production in the Mississippi Delta, p. 103–116.In F. Shepard (ed.), Recent Sediments, Northwest Gulf of Mexico. American Association of Petrologists, Texas, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  61. Whitledge, T. E., S. C. Malloy, C. J. Patton andC. D. Wirick. 1981. Automated nutrient analysis in seawater. Formal Report 51398, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York.Google Scholar
  62. Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc. Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven E. Lohrenz
    • 1
  • Gary L. Fahnenstiel
    • 2
  • Donald G. Redalje
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Marine ScienceUniversity of Southern MississippiMississippiStennis Space Center
  2. 2.Great Lakes Environmental Research LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations