, 17:501 | Cite as

The unique, widely distributed, estuarine sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis Stephenson: A review, new facts, and questions

  • Cadet Hand
  • Kevin R. Uhlinger


The small, burrowing, edwardsiid sea anemone Nematostella vectensis is widely distributed in estuaries and bays. Most typically it occurs in pools in marshes though it may occur subtidally as well. We have compiled records of its occurrence in North America from Nova Scotia to Georgia along the shores of the Atlantic Ocean, from Florida to Louisiana in the Gulf of Mexico and from California to Washington on the Pacific coast. To date we have found no records of its presence in Alabama or Texas, though it is present in all other of the contiguous coastal states of the United States. The species also occurs in England. We have obtained living specimens from many locations and have crossed females from England, Maryland, Georgia, California, Oregon, and Washington with males from Nova Scotia, Maryland, Georgia, and Oregon. These 24 crosses all yielded viable first-generation anemones that in turn produced second-generation animals. We accept this as proof that this widely distributed anemone is a single species. We have obtained living N. vectensis from 11 areas. Of these, only samples from Maine, Maryland, Georgia, and Oregon contained both sexes. The sample from Nova Scotia was all male and our samples from England, New Hampshire, California, and Washington were all female. We hypothesize that the unisexual samples were from clones resulting from asexual reproduction in this species. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A01BY066 00015

Literature Cited

  1. Ayre, D. J. 1984. The sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa: An opportunistic insectivore. Ophelia 23:149–153.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, K. and J. S. Bleakney. 1966. First Canadian record of the brackish water anthozoan Nematostella vectensis Stephenson. Canadian Field Naturalist 80:251–252.Google Scholar
  3. Bleakney, J. S. and K. B. Meyer. 1979. Observations on salt-marsh pools, Minas Basin, Nova Scotia 1965–1977. Proceedings of the Nova Scotia Institute of Science 29:353–371.Google Scholar
  4. Bromley, J. E. C. and J. S. Bleakney. 1979. Taxonomic survey of benthic fauna in estuarine saltmarsh pools, Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy. Proceedings of the Nova Scotia Institute of Science 29:411–446.Google Scholar
  5. Calder D., 1972. Phylum Cnidaria, p. 97–102. In M. L. Wass (ed.), A Checklist of Biota of Lower Chesapeake Bay. Special Scientific Report No. 65, Virginia Institute of Marine Science. College of Wiliam and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia.Google Scholar
  6. Carlton, J. T.. 1985. Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: The biology of ballast water. Oceanography and Marine Biology: Annual Reviews 23:313–371.Google Scholar
  7. Carlton, J. T.. 1987. Mechanisms and patterns of transoceanic marine biological invasions in the Pacific Ocean. Bulletin of Marine Science 41:452–465.Google Scholar
  8. Carlton, J. T. 1989. Man's role of changing the face of the ocean: Biological invasions and implications for conservation of near-shore environments. Conservation Biology 3:265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlton, J. T.. 1992a. The dispersal of living organisms into aquatic ecosystems: The mechanisms of dispersal as mediated by aquaculture and fisheries activities, p. 13–45. In A. Rosenfield and R. Mann (eds.), Dispersal of Living Organisms into Aquatic Ecosystems. The University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  10. Carlton, J. T. 1992b. Introduced marine and estuarine mollusks of North America: An end-of-the-20th-century perspective. Journal of Shellfish Research 11:489–505.Google Scholar
  11. Carlton, J. T. and J. B. Celler. 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261:78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowell, S.. 1946. A new sea anemone from Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 36:57–60.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, G. M., M. Mazurkiewicz, and M. Mandracchia. 1982. Spurwinkia: Morphology, systematics, and ecology of a new genus of North American marshland Hydrobiidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 134:143–177.Google Scholar
  14. Fell, P. E., N. C. Olmstead, E. Carlson, W. Jacob, D. Hitchcock, and G. Silber. 1982. Distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates on certain Connecticut tidal marshes, with emphasis on dominant molluscs. Estuaries 5:234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox, R. S. and E. E. Ruppert. 1985. Shallow-water Marine Benthic Macroinvertebrates of South Carolina: Species Identification, Community Composition, and Symbiotic Associations. The Belle W. Baruch Library in Marine Science, No. 14. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
  16. Francis, L.. 1973a. Clone specific segregation in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biological Bulletin 144:64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis, L.. 1973b. Intraspecific aggression and its effect on the distribution of Anthopleura elegantissima and some related sea anemones. Biological Bulletin 144:73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis, L.. 1988. Cloning and aggression among sea anemones (Coelenterata:Actiniaria) of the rocky shore. Biological Bulletin 174:241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, P. G. and J. S. Bleakney. 1976. Histology and sexual reproduction of the anemone Nematostella vectensis Stephenson. Journal of Natural History 10:441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, P. G. and J. S. Bleakney. 1978. Asexual reproduction, diet, and anomalies of the anemone Nematostella vectensis in Nova Scotia. Canadian Field Naturalist 92:259–263.Google Scholar
  21. Gosner, K. L.. 1971. Guide to Identification of Marine and Estuarine Invertebrates: Cape Hatteras to the Bay of Fundy. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Hand, C.. 1957. Another sea anemone from California types of certain California species. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 47:411–414.Google Scholar
  23. Hand, C. and K. R. Uhlinger. 1992. The culture, sexual and asexual reproduction, and growth of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Biological Bulletin 182:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haskin, H. H. and G. Ray. 1979. Report 4. Estuarine evaluation study: Benthic invertebrates. Four-year report 1973–1977, p. i-4.300. In T. Sugihara, N. P. Psuty, and J. B. Durand (eds.), Comparison of Natural and Altered Estuarine Systems: The Field Data, Vol. 1. Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, Center for Coastal and Environmental Studies. CCES Publication No. NJ/RU-DEP-11-9-79. New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  25. Heard, R. W. 1982. Guide to Common Tidal Marsh Invertebrates of the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium Publication 79-004. Ocean Springs, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman, R. J. 1976. Genetics and asexual reproduction of the sea anemone Metridium senile. Biological Bulletin 151:478–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, L. D. 1974. Environmental responses to thermal discharges from the Indian River Station, Indian River, Delaware. Electric Power Research Institute, Report No. 12. Publication No. 74-049-00-3. Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  28. Kinne, O. 1956b. Über den Einfluss des Salzgehaltes und der Temperaturauf Wachstum, Form und Vermehrung bei dem Hydroidpolypen Cordylophora caspia (Pallas), Thecata Clavidae. Zoologische Johrbücher (Physiologie) 66:565–638.Google Scholar
  29. Kneib, R. T. 1980. The response of a soft-sediment intertidal community to experimental manipulations of the population size structure and density of a predator, Fundulus heteroclitus (L.). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  30. Kneib, R. T.. 1985. Predation and disturbance by grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio Holthius, in soft-substratum benthic invertebrate assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 93:91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kneib, R. T.. 1988. Testing for indirect effects of predation in an intertidal soft-bottom community. Ecology 69:1795–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kneib, R. T.. 1991. Indirect effects in experimental studies of marine soft-sediment communities. American Zoologist 31:874–885.Google Scholar
  33. Kozloff, E. N.. 1973. Seashore Life of the Northern Pacific Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  34. Lindsay, J. A.. 1975. A salt marsh anemone. Marine Aquarist 6: 43–48.Google Scholar
  35. MacKenzie, C. L., Jr. 1977. Sea anemone predation on larval oysters in Chesapeake Bay (Maryland). Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 76:113–117.Google Scholar
  36. Mayr, E.. 1940. Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist 74:249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nixon, S. W. and C. A. Oviatt. 1973. Ecology of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs 43:463–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olmstead, N. C. and P. E. Fell. 1978. Estuarine animals, p. 12–44. In N. C. Olmstead (ed.), Plants and Animals of the Estuary. Bulletin No. 23, The Connecticut Arboretum, Connecticut College, New London.Google Scholar
  39. Posey, M. H. and A. H. Hines. 1991. Complex predator-prey interactions within an estuarine benthic community. Ecology 72:2155–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudy, P., Jr. and L. H. Rudy. 1983. Oregon Estuarine Invertebrates: An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals. FWS/OBS-83/16. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. Sanders, H. L., P. C. Mangelsdorf, Jr., and G. R. Hampson. 1965. Salinity and faunal distribution in the Pocasset River, Massachusetts. Limnology and Oceanography 10(Supplement): R216-R229.Google Scholar
  42. Shick, J. M. 1976. Ecological physiology and genetics of the colonizing actinian Haliplanella luciae, p. 137–146. In G. O. Mackie (ed.), Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Shick, J. M.. 1991. A Functional Biology of Sea Anemones. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  44. Shick, J. M. and A. N. Lamb. 1977. Asexual reproduction and genetic population structure in the colonizing sea anemone Haliplanella luciae. Biological Bulletin 153:604–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephenson, T. A.. 1928. The British Sea Anemones, Vol. I. The Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
  46. Stephenson, T. A.. 1928. The British Sea Anemones, Vol. I. The Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
  47. Stephenson, T. A.. 1935. The British Sea Anemones, Vol. II. The Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, R. B.. 1975. A redescription of the brackish-water sea anemone Nematostella vectensis Stephenson, with an appraisal of congeneric species. Journal of Natural History 9:51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, R. B.. 1976. Conservation of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis in Norfolk, England and its world distribution. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society 23:257–266.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, R. B.. 1979. Studies on the nematosomes of Nematostella vectensis Stephenson (Coelenterata, Actiniaria). Journal of Natural History 13:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, R. B.. 1983. The starlet sea anemone: Nematostella vectensis, p. 43–46. In S. M. Wells, R. M. Pyle, and N. M. Collins (eds.), The IUCN Invertebrate Red Data Book. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, R. B.. 1987. The current status of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis in England. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society 27:371–374.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, R. B.. 1988. The current status of the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis in England—A correction. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society 28:50.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, R. B.. 1991. Nematostella vectensis. The starlet sea anemone, p. 32–33. In J. H. Bratton (ed.), British Red Data Books: 3. Invertebrates other than Insects. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, London.Google Scholar
  55. Wiltse, W. I., K. H. Foreman, J. M. Teal, and I. Valiela. 1984. Effects of predators and food resources on the macrobenthos of salt marsh creeks. Journal of Marine Research 42:923–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cadet Hand
    • 1
  • Kevin R. Uhlinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Bodega Marine LaboratoryBodega Bay

Personalised recommendations