Estuaries

, 17:427 | Cite as

The ecological effects of structural flood mitigation works on fish habitats and fish communities in the lower Clarence River system of South-Eastern Australia

  • D. A. Pollard
  • J. C. Hannan
Article

Abstract

The effects of flood mitigation structures on the quality of estuarine and freshwater fish habitats in the lower Clarence River system of south-eastern Australia were investigated. Surrounding land use, fringing vegetation, overall level of habitat disturbance, distance from the sea, salinity, and water temperature were examined and compared between four sites on natural tributary streams, four sites on channelized flood mitigation drains gated at their mouths, and ten paired sites (five below and five above floodgates) on flood mitigation drains in this system, from mid 1988 to late 1990. Quantitative sampling of the fish fauna at each of these sites was conducted quarterly over this 21/2-yr period. Juvenile fishes were sampled using netting enclosures together with application of the ichthyocide rotenone, while subadults and adults were sampled using multiple-panel gill nets. In general, fish habitats in the flood mitigation drains, and especially those above flood gates, had more intensive surrounding land uses, less natural native fringing vegetation and, overall, were more highly disturbed than those in the natural tributaries. Salinity at the various study sites was largely dependent on the pattern of seasonal (mainly summer and autumn) rainfall and distance upstream from the sea. Salinities usually differed only slightly between gated and ungated sites at similar distances from the sea, indicating that the floodgates were generally ineffective in preventing the penetration of saline river water into the drains immediately above them. These gates were, however, very effective in preventing the establishment of fringing mangrove vegetation in the drains above them. The main ecological effects of these flood mitigation works have thus been to generally degrade the overall quality of available fish habitat, particularly in terms of reductions in natural fringing vegetation (mangroves in the more estuarine-dominated areas and overhanging terrestrial trees in the more freshwater-dominated areas often being replaced by grassess and rushes), and to increase the intensity of surrounding land use (natural forest often being cleared and wetlands drained for cattle grazing and sugarcane growing), both of these factors contributing to increases in generalized aquatic habitat disturbance. Results from the study of the fish assemblages in these natural and man-altered habitats revealed the following general patterns. Highest fish species numbers and abundances occurred in the ungated natural tributaries and in drains downstream of floodgates. These habitats also contained the largest proportions of both commercial fish species and individuals as well as the majority of species and individuals with marine-estuarine affinities. Both total and commercial fish species numbers generally declined with decreasing salinity and increasing distance of the sampling sites from the sea. Even through saline waters from the main river system penetrated the majority of the floodgates during most of the study period, fish passage through these gates was found to be very restricted. Fish assemblages above such gates were generally dominated by primarily freshwater species, as compared with primarily saltwater (estuarine-marine) species below. The conversion of the great majority of small mangrove-fringed tributaries in the lower reaches of this river system into uniform floodgated drainage channels has thus resulted in the destruction of, and impeded fish access to, large areas of previously available estuarine fish nursery and feeding habitat. These drainage changels are now dominated by terrestrial-freshwater vegetation above where they are cut off from the main river channels by the floodgates, and the period of their construction has coincided with that of reported declines in fish catches in this river system. On the basis of the above findings, it is recommended that these floodgates be left fully open at all times except immediately prior to and during floods in the river system, thus facilitating the re-establishment of fringing mangrove vegetation along the banks of the artificial drains in the lower reaches, generally improving flushing and thus water quality in these drains, and allowing the establishment of primarily estuarine-marine fish communities, including more species of economic importance, in them.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, G. R. 1989. Freshwater Fishes of Australia. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1991. NSW Northern Rivers study gives plenty of food for thought. Queensland Fisherman May:13–15.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, J. D., D. A. Pollard, J. J. Burchmore, B. C. Pease, and M. J. Middleton. 1984. Structure of a fish community in a temperate tidal mangrove creek in Botany Bay, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 35: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs, S. 1977. Flood mitigation. National Parks Journal (NSW) 21:5–8.Google Scholar
  5. Bureau of Meteorology. 1988, 1989, 1990. Monthly Weather Reviews, New South Wales. Department of Administrative Services, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, J. S. and E. Woolmington. 1981. Threat and stress in the Clarence River estuary of northern New South Wales. Human Ecology 9:419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Copeland, C. and D. Pollard. 1993. The value of NSW estuarine fisheries. Wetlands (Australia) (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Dunstan, D. 1976. Effects of flood, mitigation operations on the aquatic environment and fisheries of the Macleay Valley. Flood Mitigation Conference, Kempsey, New South Wales, December 1976. NSW State Fisheries. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Furner, I. 1988. Flood mitigation and wetlands in the Hunter Valley, p. 99–104. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wetlands, Shortland Wetlands Centre, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Goodrick, G. N. 1970. A survey of wetlands of coastal New South Wales. Technical Memorandum No. 5, CSIRO Division of Wildlife Research. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Graham, M. K. B. 1989. Fish utilisation of the Newrybar flood mitigation drain and fish habitat management of flood mitigation schemes. Thesis, University of New England (Northern Rivers), Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, O. M. 1979. DECORANA; A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence and reciprocal averaging. Department of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, O. M. and H. G. Gauch 1980. Detrended Correspondence Analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchins, B. and R. Swainston. 1986. Sea Fishes of Southern Australia. Swainston Publishing, Perth Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Karmouche, J. and P. McCarthy. 1977. Flood mitigation in the lower Clarence River valley. In L. Olive (ed.), Integrated Ecology of the Clarence River Valley. Department of Geography University of New South Wales, Royal Military Colege. Duntroon, ACT.Google Scholar
  16. Kearney, R. 1990. Northern Rivers research reveals NSW Northern Rivers stocks stable. Australian Fisheries 49:8–10.Google Scholar
  17. McGregor, W. N. 1979. The environmental effects of flood mitigation works with particular reference to the estuarine situation. Thesis, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  18. Merrick, J. R. and G. E. Schmida. 1984. Australian Freshwater Fishes. Merrick, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Middleton, M. J., M. A. Rimmer, and R. J. Williams. 1985. Structural flood mitigation works and estuarine management in New South Wales—Case study of the Macleay River. Coastal Zone Management 13:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montcomery, S. S. and V. C. McDonall 1988. A summary of the research conducted on estuarine prawn trawl fisheries in New South Wales and recommendations for their future management. Internal Report No. 46, Fisheries Research Institute, Gronulla, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Morton, R. M. 1990. Community structure, density, and standing crop of fishes in a subtropical Australian mangrove area. Marine Biology 105:385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morton, R. M., J. P. Beumer, and B. R. Pollock. 1988. Fishes of a subtropical Australian saltmarsh and their predation upon mosquitoes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 21:185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morton, R. M., B. R. Pollock, and J. P. Beumer. 1987. The occurrence and diet of fishes in a tidal inlet to a saltmarsh in southern Moreton Bay, Queensland. Australian Journal of Ecology 12:217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. New South Wales Department of Public Works. 1989. NSW estuary and river water levels, annual summary 1988/89. Report No. 564. Manly Hydraulics Laboratory, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  25. New South Wales Department of Public Works. 1990. NSW estuary and river water levels, annual summary 1989/90. Report No. 582. Manly Hydraulics Laboratory, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. New South Wales State Fisheries. 1976. Impact of dam construction and flood mitigation works on the aquatic environment. NSW State Pollution Control Commission's Technical Advisory Committee. New South Wales State Fisheries. Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Paxton, J. R., D. F. Hoese, G. R. Allen, and J. E. Hanley. 1989. Zoological Catalogue of Australia, Vol. 7, Pisces—Petromyzontidae to Carangidae. Australia Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Pollard, D. A. 1976. Estuaries must be protected. Australian Fisheries 35:61–65.Google Scholar
  29. Pollard, D. A. 1981. Estuaries are valuable contributors to fisheries production. Australian Fisheries 40:7–9.Google Scholar
  30. Pollard, D. A., M. J. Middleton, and R. J. Williams (eds.). 1991. Estuarine Habitat Management Guidelines. Division of Fisheries, NSW Agriculture & Fisheries, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Pressey, R. L. and M. J. Middleton. 1982. Impacts of flood mitigation works on coastal wetlands in New South Wales. Wetlands (Australia) 2:27–44.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, B. A. 1981. Fish kill in the Belmore River, Macleay River Drainage, NSW, and the possible influence of flood mitigation works, p. 50–60. In Proceedings of the Floodplain Management Conference. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Salisbury, S., R. G. Wilson, and E. Woolmington. 1980. Fishermen's views: Transcripts of interviews with members of the fishing fleet of the lower Clarence River. Department of Geography, University of New South Wales, Royal Military College, Duntroon, ACT.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, R. J. 1986. A review of flood mitigation and drainage works in the Yarrahappini Broadwater, Macleay Estuary. Wetlands Protection Seminar, North Coast Environment Council, Yarrahappini Ecology Centre, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. State Pollution Control Commission. 1978. Report and findings of the environmental investigation into the environmental impact assessment of flood mitigation works and dams. State Pollution Control Commission, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. State Pollution Control Commission. 1987. Water quality in the Clarence River. Northern Rivers Study Report No. 3. State Pollution Control Commission, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  37. Swales, S. 1982a. Fisheries conservation and land drainage improvement. In J. H. Glover (ed.), Allocation of Fishery Resources. FAO and American Fisheries Society, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  38. Swales, S. 1982b. Environmental effects of river channel works used in land drainage improvement. Journal of Environmental Management 14:103–126.Google Scholar
  39. Virgona, J. L. 1992. Environmental factors influencing the prevalence of a cutaneous ulcerative disease (red spot) in the Estuary, New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Fish Diseases 15:363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission of New South Wales. 1968. Water Resources of the Clarence Valley. Report No. 11, Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Pollard
    • 1
  • J. C. Hannan
    • 1
  1. 1.Fisheries Research InstituteCronullaAustralia

Personalised recommendations