Estuaries

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 226–234

Salt-marsh tide pools as winter refuges for the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, in New Jersey

  • Kelly J. Smith
  • Kenneth W. Able
Article

Abstract

Mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, were collected weekly from a southern New Jersey high-salinity salt marsh from October 1988 to June 1989 and from September 1989 to June 1990 to determine the overwintering habitat. Major habitat types sampled within the salt marsh were subtidal creek, intertidal creeks, and salt-marsh pools. Few individuals were collected in the intertidal creek or the subtidal creek from the end of October through the beginning of May for both years, when creek water temperatures were low. Both young-of-the-year and adults of both sexes were abundant in the salt-marsh pools (total lengths ranged from 29 mm to 125 mm) throughout the winter. In the spring, catch per unit effort (CPUE) within the tidal creek increased with increasing water temperature, while CPUE in marsh pools decreased with increases in estuarine water temperature. These collection patterns indicate that the majority ofF. heteroclitus may move from subtidal and intertidal creeks into salt-marsh pools in the late fall and leave in the spring. This seasonal movement could explain how fish survive winter environmental conditions because daily average water temperatures of salt-marsh pools were warmer than subtidal creek temperatures for much of the winter.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Able, K. W. 1990. Life history patterns of New Jersey salt marsh killifishes.Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 35:23–30.Google Scholar
  2. Able, K. W., R. Hoden, D. Witting, andJ. B. Durand. 1992. Physical parameters of the Great Bay-Mullica River Estuary. Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Technical Report No. 92-06, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 38 p.Google Scholar
  3. Boesch, D. F. andR. E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: The role of food and refuge.Estuaries 7:460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burger, J. 1983. Jamaica Bay Studies II: Effect of tidal, temporal and weather variables on distribution of ibises, egrets, and herons on a coastal estuary.Acta Oecologia 4:181–189.Google Scholar
  5. Chidester, F. E. 1920. The behavior ofFundulus heteroclitus on the salt marshes of New Jersey.American Naturalist 54:551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crabtree, R. E. andJ. M. Dean. 1982. the structure of two South Carolina estuarine tide pool fish assemblages.Estuaries 5:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Currin, B. M., J. P. Reed andJ. M. Miller. 1984. Growth, production, food consumption, and mortality of juvenile spot and croaker: A comparison of tidal and nontidal nursery areas.Estuaries 7:451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fritz, E. S., W. H. Meredith, andV. A. Lotrich. 1975. Fall and winter movements and activity level of the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, in a tidal creek.Chesapeake Science 16:211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoff, J. G. andR. M. Ibara. 1977. Factors affecting the seasonal abundance, composition, and diversity of fishes in a New England estuary.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5:665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lotrich, V. A. 1975. Summer home range and movements ofFundulus heteroclitus (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae) in a tidal creek.Ecology 56:191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lotrich, V. andW. H. Meredith. 1974. A technique and the effectiveness of various acrylic colors for subcutaneous marking of fish.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 103:140–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nixon, S. W. andC. A. Oviatt. 1973. Ecology of a New England salt marsh.Ecological Monographs 43:463–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rountree, R. A. 1992. Fish and macroinvertebrate community structure and habitat use patterns in salt marsh creeks of southern New Jersey, with a discussion of marsh carbon export. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 292 p.Google Scholar
  14. Rountree, R. A. andK. W. Able. 1992. Fauna of polyhaline subtidal marsh creeks in southern New Jersey: Composition, abundance, and biomass.Estuaries 15:171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rozas, L. P., C. C. McIvor, andW. E. Odum. 1988. Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: Corridors between tidal creeks and marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 47:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shenker, J. M. andJ. M. Dean. 1979. The utilization of an intertidal salt marsh creek by larval and juvenile fishes: Abundance, diversity, and temporal variability.Estuaries 2: 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Talbot, C. W. andK. W. Able. 1984. Composition and distribution of larval fishes in New Jersey high marshes.Estuaries 7:434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Talbot, C. W., K. W. Able, andJ. K. Shisler. 1986. Fish species composition in New Jersey salt marshes: Effects of marsh alterations for mosquito control.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Targett, T. E. 1978. Respiratory metabolism of temperature acclimatedFundulus heteroclitus (L.): Zones of compensation and dependence.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 32:197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tonn, W. M. 1985. Density compensation inUmbra-Perca fish assemblages of northern Wisconsin lakes.Ecology 66:415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly J. Smith
    • 1
  • Kenneth W. Able
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Field Station Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesRutgers UniversityTuckerton

Personalised recommendations