Estuaries

, 19:612 | Cite as

Occurrence of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the oligohaline Hudson River, New York

Article

Abstract

Between May and October of 1992,Dreissena polymorpha invaded the oligohaline portion of the Hudson River Estuary to river kilometer (RKM) 65 (as measured upstream from the river mouth), recruiting onto suspended concrete cinder blocks and surviving 2–5‰ salinity.D. polymorpha was significantly most abundant at the most upstream sites examined, RKMs 112 and 99 (0–3‰), decreased significantly at each more downstream site, with none found at the most downstream site, RKM 49 (5–9‰). The size frequencies ofD. polymorpha at the most upstream sites were skewed toward the smallest identifiable size-class (2 mm <shell length≤3 mm). The abundance data suggest thatD. polymorpha passively dispersed downstream from established upstream source populations. By extending its range to the oligohaline zone of the Hudson River,D. polymorpha has encountered a novel suite of species with which to interact, several of which are also introduced species.Dreissena polymorpha now sympatrically occurs with other fouling organisms, including the introduced false dark mussel,Mytilopsis leucophaeata, the introduced hydroidCordylophora caspia, and the barnacleBalanus improvisus. D. polymorpha also established sympatry with a potential predator, the blue crab,Callinectes sapidus, and a potential macrophytic substrate, the introduced water chestnut,Trapa natans.

Literature Cited

  1. bij de Vaate, A. 1991. Distribution and aspects of population dynamics of the zebra musselDreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771) in the Lake IJsselmeer area (the Netherlands).Oecologia 86:40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke, S. F. 1878. A new locality for Cordylophora.American Naturalist 12:232–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, J. C., F. R. Cantelmo, andC. E. Newton. 1988. Overview of the Hudson River Estuary.American Fisheries Society Monographs 4:11–24.Google Scholar
  4. Gillis, P. L. andG. L. Mackie. 1994. Impact of the zebra mussel,Dreissena polymorpha, on populations of Unionidae (Bivalvia) in Lake St. Clair.Canadian Journal of Zoology 72:1260–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gladden, J. B., F. R. Cantelmo, J. M. Croom, andR. Shapot. 1988. Evaluation of the Hudson River Ecosystem in relation to the dynamics of fish populations.American Fisheries Society Monographs 4:37–52.Google Scholar
  6. Griffiths, R. W. 1993. Effects of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on the benthic fauna of Lake St. Clair, p. 415–437.In T. F. Nalepa and D. W. Schloesser (eds.), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths, R. W., D. W. Schloesser, J. H. Leach, andW. P. Kovalak. 1991. Distribution and dispersal of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Great Lakes region.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1381–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hebert, P. D. N., B. W. Muncaster, andG. L. Mackie. 1989. Ecological genetic studies onDreissena polymorpha (Pallas); a new mollusc in the Great Lakes.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1587–1591.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobson, M. K. 1953.Congeria leucophaeata (Conrad) in the Hudson River.Nautilus 66:125–127.Google Scholar
  10. Jenner, H. A. and J. P. M. Janssen-Mommen. 1989. Control of the zebra mussel in power plants and industrial settings. Second International Conference on the Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Great Lakes.Google Scholar
  11. Jenner, H. A. andJ. P. M. Janssen-Mommen. 1993. Monitoring and control ofDreissena polymorpha and other macrofouling bivalves in the Netherlands, p. 537–554.In T. F. Nalepa and D. W. Schloesser (eds.), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Kilgour, B. W., G. L. Mackie, M. A. Baker, andR. Keppel. 1994. Effects of salinity on the condition and survival of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha).Estuaries 17:385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewandowski, K. 1983. Occurrence and filtering capacity of young plant-dwellingDreissena polymorpha (Pallas) in Majez Wiecki Lake.Polish Archivum Hydrobiologii 30:255–262.Google Scholar
  14. Mackie, G. L. and B. W. Kilgour. 1992. Effects of salinity on growth and survival of the zebra mussels. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation (ESEERCO) 91-22. (available from MAWSA, 381 Elmira Rd., Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1K 1H3).Google Scholar
  15. MacNeill, D. B. 1991a. Identification of juvenileDreissena andMytilopsis leucophaeata.Dreissena polymorpha Information Review 2:1–2.Google Scholar
  16. MacNeill, D. B. 1991b. Potential overlap ofDreissena andMytilopsis in the Hudson River.Dreissena polymorpha Information Review 2:2,3,9.Google Scholar
  17. May, B. andJ. E. Marsden. 1992. Genetic identification and implications of another invasive species of dreissenid mussel in the Great Lakes.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:1501–1506.Google Scholar
  18. Mellina, E. andJ. B. Rasmussen. 1994. Occurrence of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the intertidal region of the St. Lawrence Estuary.Journal of Freshwater Ecology 9:81–84.Google Scholar
  19. Moran, M. A. andK. E. Limburg. 1986. The Hudson River Ecosystem, p. 6–39.In K. E. Limburg, M. A. Moran, and W. H. McDowell (eds.), The Hudson River Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  20. New York Sea Grant. 1994. North American Range of the Zebra Mussel [map]. New York Sea Grant, Brockport, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Pathy, D. A. andG. L. Mackie. 1993. Comparative shell morphology ofDreissena polymorpha, Mytilopsis leucophaeata, and the “quagga” mussel (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) in North America.Canadian Journal of Zoology 71:1012–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ristich, S. S., M. Crandall, andJ. Fortier. 1977. Benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrates of the Hudson River: I. Distribution, natural history, and community structures.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Sciences 5:255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, G. andM. L. Ludyanskiy. 1994. A nomenclatural review ofDreissena (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae), with identification of the quagga mussel asDreissena bugensis.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:1474–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, H., A. bij de Vaate, H. H. Reeders, E. H. van Nes, andR. Noordhuis. 1993. Colonization, ecology, and positive aspects of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Netherlands, p. 55–78.In T. F. Nalepa and D. W. Schloesser (eds.), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  25. Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Strayer, D. 1991. Projected distribution of the zebra mussel,Dreissena polymorpha, in North America.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strayer, D. andJ. Powell. 1992. Appearance and spread of the zebra mussel in the Hudson River Estuary in 1991.Dreissena polymorpha Information Review 3:1,3.Google Scholar
  28. Strayer, D. andL. C. Smith. 1993. The distribution ofDreissena polymorpha in estuaries and brackish waters, p. 715–728.In T. F. Nalepa and D. W. Schloesser (eds.), Zebra Mussels: Biology, Impacts, and Control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  29. Strayer, D. L., D. C. Hunter, L. C. Smith, andC. K. Borg. 1994. Distribution, abundance and roles of freshwater clams (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in the freshwater tidal Hudson River.Freshwater Biology 31:239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SYSTAT,Inc. 1992. Systat. Version 5.2 editon. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  31. Van der Brink, F. W. B., G. van der Velde, andA. bij de Vaate. 1991. Amphipod invasion on the Rhine.Nature 352:576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van der Kolk, A. J. 1990. Oecologie en oecofysiologie van der brakwater mosselMytilopsis leucophaeata. Vakgroep Aquatische Oecologie en Biogeologie, Katholieke Universiteit, Toernooiveld, Nijmegen (Netherlands). Doctoraalsverlag, No 288.Google Scholar
  33. Van der Velde, G., K. Hermus, M. van der Gaag, andH. A. Jenner. 1992. Cadmium, zinc and copper in the body, byssus and shell of the musselsMytilopsis leucophaeata andDreissena polymorpha in the brackish Noordzeekanal of the Netherlands, p. 215–226.In D. Neumann and H. A. Jenner (eds.), The Zebra Mussel,Dreissena polymorpha. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Van der Velde, G., B. G. P. Paffen, F. W. B. van den Brink, A. bij de Vaate, andH. A. Jenner. 1994. Decline of zebra mussel populations in the Rhine.Naturwissenschaften 81:32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolff, W. J. 1969. The mollusca of the estuarine region of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in relation to the hydrogeography of the area. II. The Dreissenidae.Basteria 33:93–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewater

Personalised recommendations