Advertisement

Estuaries

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 186–201 | Cite as

Microphytobenthos: The ecological role of the “secret garden” of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. I. Distribution, abundance and primary production

  • Hugh L. MacIntyre
  • Richard J. Geider
  • Douglas C. Miller
Article

Abstract

The microphytobenthos consists of unicellular eukaryotic algae and cyanobacteria that grow within the upper several millimeters of illuminated sediments, typically appearing only as a subtle brownish or greenish shading. The surficial layer of the sediment is a zone of intense microbial and geochemical activity and of considerable physical reworking. In many shallow ecosystems, the biomass of benthic microalgae often exceeds that of the phytoplankton in the overlying waters. Direct comparison of the abundance of benthic and suspended microalgae is complicated by the means used to measure biomass and by the vertical and horizontal distribution of the microphytobenthos in the sediment. Where biomass has been estimated as chlorophyll a, there may be negligible to large (40%) error due to interference by degradation products, except where chlorophyll is measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The vertical distribution of microphytobenthos, aside from mat-forming species, is determined by the opposing effects of their vertical migration, which tends to concentrate them near the surface, and physical mixing by overlying currents, which tends to cause an even vertical distribution through the mixed layer of sediment. Uncertainties in vertical distribution are compounded by frequently patchy horizontal distribution. Under-sampling on small (<1 m) scales can lead to errors in the estimate that are comparable to the ranges of seasonal and geographic variation. These uncertainties are compounded by biases in the techniques used to estimate production by the microphytobenthos. In most environments studied, biomass (as chlorophyll a) and light availability appear to be the principal determinants of benthic primary production. The effect of variable light intensities on integral production can be described by a functional response curve. When normalized to the chlorophyll content of the surficial sediment, the residual variation in the data described by the functional response curve is due to changes in the chlorophyll-specific response to irradiance. Production by the benthos is often a significant fraction of production in the water column and microphytobenthos may contribute directly to water column production when they are resuspended. Thus on both the basis of biomass and biogeochemical reactivity, benthic microalgae play significant roles in system productivity and trophic dynamics, as well as such habitat characteristics as sediment stability. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A01BY074 00003

Keywords

Chlorophyll Phytoplankton Salt Marsh Marine Biology Marine Ecology Progress Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Admiraal, W. and H. Peletier. 1980. Influence of seasonal variations of temperature and light on the growth rate of cultures and natural populations of intertidal diatoms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2:35–43.Google Scholar
  2. Admiraal, W., H. Peletier, and T. Brouwer. 1984. The seasonal succession patterns of diatom species on an intertidal mudflat: An experimental analysis. Oikos 42:30–40.Google Scholar
  3. Admiraal, W., H. Peletier, and H. Zomer. 1982. Observations and experiments on the population dynamics of epipelic diatoms of an estuarine mudflat. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 14:471–487.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, F. E. 1976. Rapid settling rates observed in sediments resuspended by boat waves over a tidal flat. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 10:44–58.Google Scholar
  5. Antoine, S. E. and K. Benson-Evans. 1985. The epipelic algal flora of the River Wye system, Wales, U.K. I. Productivity and total biomass dynamics. Internationale Ruvue der gesamten Hydrobiologie 70:575–589.Google Scholar
  6. Arfi, R., D. Guiral, and M. Bouvy. 1993. Wind induced resuspension in a shallow tropical lagoon. Estuarine Coastal and shelf Science 36:587–604.Google Scholar
  7. Baillie, P. W. 1986. Oxygenation of intertidal estuarine sediments by benthic microalgal photosynthesis. Estuarine coastal and Shelf Science 22:143–159.Google Scholar
  8. Baillie, P. W. 1987. Diatom size distributions and community stratification in estuarine intertidal sediments. Estuarine Coastal and shelf Science 25:193–209.Google Scholar
  9. Baillie, P. W. and B. L. Welsh. 1980. The effect of tidal resuspension on the distribution of intertidal epipelic algae in an estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 10:165–180.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, L. M., B. T. Hargrave, and M. D. MacKinnon. 1981. Analysis of chlorophyll a in sediments by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 38:205–214.Google Scholar
  11. Burnett, F. H. 1962. The Secret Garden. Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  12. Cadée, G. C. and J. Hegeman. 1974. Primary production of the benthic microglora living on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 8:260–291.Google Scholar
  13. Cadée, G. C. and J. Hegeman. 1977. Distribution of primary production of the benthic microflora and accumulation of organic matter on a tidal flat area, Balgzand, Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 11:24–41.Google Scholar
  14. Cahoon, L. B., G. B. Beretich, C. J. Thomas, and A. M. McDonald. 1993. Benthic microalgal production at Stellwagen Bank, Massachusetts Bay, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 102:179–185.Google Scholar
  15. Cahoon, L. B. and J. E. Cooke. 1992. Benthic microalgal production in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 84:185–196.Google Scholar
  16. Cahoon, L. H. and R. A. Laws. 1993. Benthic diatoms from the North Carolina continental shelf: Inner and mid shelf. Journal of Phycology 29:257–263.Google Scholar
  17. Cahoon, L. B., R. S. Redman, and C. R. Tronzo. 1990. Benthic microalgal biomass in sediments of Onslow Bay, North Carolina. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 31:805–816.Google Scholar
  18. Cheng, I.-J., J. S. Levinton, M. McCartney, D. Martinez, and M. J. Weissburg. 1993. A bioassay approach to seasonal variation in the nutritional value of sediment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 94:275–285.Google Scholar
  19. Cloern, J. E., T. M. Powell, and L. M. Huzzey. 1989. Spatial and temporal variability in south San Francisco Bay (USA). II. Temporal changes in salinity, suspended sediments, and phytoplankton biomass and productivity over tidal time scales. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 28:599–613.Google Scholar
  20. Colijn, F. 1982. Light absorption in the waters of the Ems-Dollard estuary and its consequences for the growth of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 15:196–216.Google Scholar
  21. Colijn, F. and V. N. de Jonge. 1984. Primary production of microphytobenthos in the Ems-Dollard estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 14:185–196.Google Scholar
  22. Colijn, F. and K. S. Dijkema. 1981. Species composition of benthic diatoms and distribution of chlorophyll a on an intertidal flat in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 4:9–21.Google Scholar
  23. Colijn, F. and G. van Buurt. 1975. Influence of light and temperature on the photosynthetic rate of marine benthic diatoms. Marine Biology 31:209–214.Google Scholar
  24. Connor, M. S. and R. K. Edgar. 1982. Selective grazing by the mud snail Ilyanassa obsoleta. Oecologia 53:271–275.Google Scholar
  25. Côte, B. and T. Platt. 1983. Day-to-day variations in the spring-summer photosynthetic parameters of coastal marine phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 28:320–344.Google Scholar
  26. Daemen, E. A. M. J. 1986. Comparison of methods for the determination of chlorophyll in estuarine sediments. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 20:21–28.Google Scholar
  27. Darley, M. W., C. L. Montague, F. G. Plumley, W. W. Sage, and A. T. Psalidas. 1981. Factors limiting edaphic algal biomass and productivity in a Georgia salt marsh. Journal of Phycology 17:122–128.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, M. W. and C. D. McIntire. 1983. Effects of physical gradients on the production dynamics of sediment-associated algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 13:103–114.Google Scholar
  29. de Jonge, V. N. 1985. The occurrence of ‘episamic’ diatom populations: A result of interaction between physical sorting of sediment and certain properties of diatom species. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 21:607–622.Google Scholar
  30. de Jonge, V. N. and F. Colijn. 1994. Dynamics of microphytobenthos biomass in the Ems estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 104:185–196.Google Scholar
  31. de Jonge, V. N. and J. E. E. van Beusekom. 1992. Contribution of resuspended microphytobenthos to total phytoplankton in the Ems Estuary and its possible role for grazers. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 30:91–105.Google Scholar
  32. Delgado, M. 1989. Abundance and distribution of microphytobenthos in the bays of Ebro Delta (Spain). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 29:183–194.Google Scholar
  33. Delgado, M., V. de Jonge, and H. Peletier. 1991. Experiments on the resuspension of natural microphytobenthos populations. Marine Biology 108:321–328.Google Scholar
  34. Demers, S., J.-C. Therriault, E. Bourget, and A. Bah. 1987. Resuspension in the shallow sublittoral zone of a macrotidal estuarine environment: Wind influence. Limnology and Oceanography 32:327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Estrada, M., I. Valiela, and J. M. Teal. 1974. Concentration and distribution of chlorophyll on fertilized plots in a Massachusetts salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 14:47–56.Google Scholar
  36. Fenchel, T. and B. J. Straarup. 1971. Vertical distribution of photosynthetic pigments and the penetration of light in marine sediments. Oikos 22:172–182.Google Scholar
  37. Fielding, P. J., K. St. J. Damstra, and G. M. Branch. 1988. Benthic diatom biomass, production and sediment chlorophyll in Langebaan Lagoon, South Africa. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 27:413–426.Google Scholar
  38. Garbielson, J. O. and R. J. Lukatelich. 1985. Wind-related resuspension of sediments in the Peel-Harvey estuarine system. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 20:135–145.Google Scholar
  39. Gallagher, J. J. 1975. The significance of the surface film in salt marsh plankton metabolism. Limnology and Oceanography 20:120–123.Google Scholar
  40. Garcia-Soto, C., I. de Madariaga, F. Villate, and E. Orive. 1990. Day-to-day variability in the plankton community of a coastal shallow embayment in response to changes in river runoff and water turbulence. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 31:217–229.Google Scholar
  41. Gargas, E. 1970. Measurements of primary production, dark fixation and vertical distribution of the microbenthic algae in the Øresund. Ophelia 8:231–253.Google Scholar
  42. Gargas, E. 1971. Sun-shade adaptation in microbenthic algae from the Øresund. Ophelia 9:107–112.Google Scholar
  43. Gargas, E. 1972. Measurement of microalgal primary production (phytoplankton and microbenthos) in the Smålandshavet (Denmark). Ophelia 10:75–89.Google Scholar
  44. Garrad, P. N. and R. D. Hey. 1987. Boat traffic, sediment suspension and turbidity in a broadland river. Journal of Hydrobiology 95:289–297.Google Scholar
  45. Gomoiu, M.-T. 1967. Some quantitative data on light penetration in sediments. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 15:120–127.Google Scholar
  46. Gould, D. M. and E. D. Gallagher. 1990. Field measurements of specific growth rate, biomass, and primary production of benthic diatoms of Savin Hill Cove, Boston. Limnology and Oceanography 35:1757–1770.Google Scholar
  47. Granéli, E. and K. Sundbäck. 1985. The response of planktonic and microbenthic algal assemblages to nutrient enrichment in shallow coastal waters, southwestern Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 85:253–268.Google Scholar
  48. Grant, J. 1986. Sensitivity of benthic community respiration and primary production to changes in temperature and light. Marine Biology 90:299–306.Google Scholar
  49. Grøntved, J. 1960. On the productivity of microbenthos and phytoplankton in some Danish fjords. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fisheri- og Havundersøgelser 3:55–92.Google Scholar
  50. Haardt, H. and G. Æ. Nielsen. 1980. Attenuation measurements of monochromatic light in marine sediments. Oceanologica Acta 3:333–338.Google Scholar
  51. Hartwig, E. O. 1978. Factors affecting respiration and photosynthesis by the benthic community of a subtidal siliceous sediment. Marine Biology 46:283–293.Google Scholar
  52. Heckman, C. W. 1985. The development of vertical migration patterns in the sediments of estuaries as a strategy for algae to resist drift with tidal currents. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 70:151–164.Google Scholar
  53. Herndl, G. J., P. Peduzzi, and N. Fanuko. 1989. Benthic community metabolism and microbial dynamics in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea). Marine Ecology Progress Series 53:169–178.Google Scholar
  54. Hickman, M. and F. E. Round. 1970. Primary production and standing crops of epipelic and epipsammic algae. British Phycology Journal 5:247–255.Google Scholar
  55. Holland, A., R. Zingmark, and J. Dean. 1974. Quantitative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms. Marine Biology 27:191–196.Google Scholar
  56. Holm-Hansen, O. 1978. Chlorophyll a determination: Improvements in methodology. Oikos 30:438–447.Google Scholar
  57. Hopkins, J. T. 1963. A study of the diatoms of the Ouse estuary, Sussex. I. The movement of the mud-flat diatoms in response to some chemical and physical changes. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 43:653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Howarth, R. W. 1984. The ecological significance of sulfur in the energy dynamics of salt marsh and coastal marine sediments. Biogeochemistry 1:5–27.Google Scholar
  59. Hunding, C. 1971. Production of benthic microalgae in the littoral zone of a eutrophic lake. Oikos 22:389–397.Google Scholar
  60. Jassby, A. D., J. E. Cloern, and T. M. Powell. 1993. Organic carbon sources and sinks in San Francisco Bay: Variability induced by river flow. Marine Ecology Progress Series 95:39–54.Google Scholar
  61. Jassby, A. D. and T. Platt. 1976. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 21:540–547.Google Scholar
  62. Jeffrey, S. W. and G. F. Humphrey. 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae, and natural phytoplankton. Biochemie and Physiologie der Pflantzen 167:191–194.Google Scholar
  63. Jenness, M. I. and G. C. A. Duineveld. 1985. Effects of tidal currents on chlorophyll a content of sandy sediments in the southern North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21:283–287.Google Scholar
  64. Joint, I. R. 1978. Microbial production of an estuarine mudflat. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7:185–195.Google Scholar
  65. Joint, I. R., J. M. Gee, and R. M. Warwick. 1982. Determination of fine-scale vertical distribution of microbes and meiofauna in an intertidal sediment. Marine Biology 72:157–164.Google Scholar
  66. Jönsson, B. 1991. A 14C-incubation technique for measuring microphytobenthic primary production in intact sediment cores. Limnology and Oceanography 36:1485–1492.Google Scholar
  67. Jørgensen, B. B. and D. J. Des Marais. 1986. A simple fiberoptic microprobe for high resolution light measurements: Application in marine sediment. Limnology and Oceanography 31:1376–1383.Google Scholar
  68. Jørgensen, B. B. and D. J. Des Marais. 1988. Optical properties of benthic photosynthetic communities: Fiber-optic studies of cyanobacterial mats. Limnology and Oceanography 33:99–113.Google Scholar
  69. Jørgensen, B. B. and N. P. Revsbech. 1983. Photosynthesis and structure of benthic microbial mats: Microelectrode and SEM studies of four cyanobacterial communities. Limnology and Oceanography 28:1075–1093.Google Scholar
  70. Jørgensen, B. B., N. P. Revsbech, T. H. Blackburn, and Y. Cohen. 1979. Diurnal cycle of oxygen and sulfide microgradients and microbial photosynthesis in a cyanobacterial mat sediment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37:46–58.Google Scholar
  71. Jumars, P. A. and A. R. M. Nowell. 1984. Fluid and sediment dynamic effects on marine benthic community structure. American Zoology 24:45–55.Google Scholar
  72. Kromm, M. 1991. Importance of benthic productivity in controlling the flux of dissolved inorganic nitrogen through the sediment-water interface in a hypertrophic marine ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 78:163–172.Google Scholar
  73. Kühl, M. and B. B. Jørgensen. 1994. The light field of microbenthic communities: Radiance distribution and microscale optics of sandy coastal sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 39:1368–1398.Google Scholar
  74. Kühl, M., C. Lassen, and B. B. Jørgensen. 1994. Light penetration and light intensity in sandy marine sediments measured with irradiance and scalar irradiance fiber-optic microprobes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 105:139–148.Google Scholar
  75. Leach, J. H. 1970. Epibenthic algal production in an intertidal mudflat. Limnology Oceanography 15:514–521.Google Scholar
  76. Litaker, W., C. S. Duke, B. E. Kenney, and J. Ramus. 1987. Short-term environmental variability and phytoplankton abundance in a shallow tidal estuary. I. Winter and summer. Marine Biology 96:115–121.Google Scholar
  77. Litaker, W., C. S. Duke, B. E. Kenney, and J. Ramus. 1993. Short-term environmental variability and phytoplankton abundance in a shallow tidal estuary. II. Spring and fall. Marine Ecology Progress Series 94:141–154.Google Scholar
  78. Lorenzen, C. J. and S. W. Jeffrey. 1980. Determination of chlorophyll in sea water. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 35:1–20.Google Scholar
  79. Lukatelich, R. J. and A. J. McComb. 1986. Distribution and abundance of benthic microalgae in a shallow southwestern Australian estuarine system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 27:287–297.Google Scholar
  80. MacIntyre, H. L. and J. J. Cullen. 1995. Fine-scale vertical resolution of chlorophyll and photosynthetic parameters in shallow-water benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 122:227–237.Google Scholar
  81. MacIntyre, H. L. and J. J. Cullen. 1996. Primary production by suspended and benthic microalgae in a turbid estuary: Time-scales of variability in San Antonio Bay, Texas. Marine Ecology Progress Series In Press.Google Scholar
  82. Marshall, N., C. A. Oviatt, and D. M. Skauen. 1971. Productivity of the benthic microflora of shoal estuarine environments in southern New England. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie 56:947–956.Google Scholar
  83. Marshall, N., D. M. Skauen, H. C. Lampe, and C. A. Oviatt. 1972. A guide to the measurement of marine production under some special conditions, p. 37–44. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 3, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  84. Matheke, G. E. M. and R. Horner. 1974. Primary productivity of the benthic microalgae in the Chukchi Sea near Barow, Alaska. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 31:1779–1786.Google Scholar
  85. McClatchie, S., S. K. Juniper, and G. A. Knox. 1982. Structure of a mudflat diatom community in the Avon-Heathcote Estuary, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Fresh-water Research 16:299–309.Google Scholar
  86. Meadows, P. S. and J. G. Anderson. 1968. Micro-organisms attached to marine sand grains. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 48:161–175.Google Scholar
  87. Miller, D. C., R. J. Geider, H. L. MacIntyre. 1996. Microphytobenthos: The ecological role of the “Secret Garden” of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. II. Role in sediment stability and shallow-water food webs. Estuaries 19:202–212.Google Scholar
  88. Nienhuis, P. H. and B. H. H. de Bree. 1984. Carbon fixation and chlorophyll in bottom sediments of brackish Lake Grevelingen, the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 18:337–359.Google Scholar
  89. Nowicki, B. L. and S. W. Nixon. 1985. Benthic community metabolism in a coastal lagoon ecosystem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 22:21–30.Google Scholar
  90. Palmer, J. D. and F. E. Round. 1965. Persistent, vertical-migration rhythms in benthic microflora. I. The effect of light and temperature on the rhythmic behaviour of Euglena obtusa. Journal of the Marine Biology Association of the United Kingdom 45:567–582.Google Scholar
  91. Pamatmat, M. M. 1968. Ecology and metabolism of a benthic community on an intertidal sand flat. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 53:211–298.Google Scholar
  92. Paterson, D., R. Crawford, and C. Little. 1990. Subaerial exposure and changes in sediment stability of intertidal estuarine sediments. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 30:541–556.Google Scholar
  93. Pejrup, M. 1986. Parameters affecting fine-grained suspended sediment concentrations in a shallow micro-tidal estuary, Ho Bugt, Denmark. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 22:241–254.Google Scholar
  94. Pinckney, J. and R. G. Zingmark. 1993a. Biomass and production of benthic microalgal communities in estuarine habitats. Estuaries 16:887–897.Google Scholar
  95. Pinckney, J. and R. G. Zingmark. 1993b. Modelling intertidal benthic microalgal production in estuaries. Journal of Phycology 29:396–407.Google Scholar
  96. Pinckney, J. and R. G. Zingmark. 1993c. Photophysiological responses of intertidal benthic microalgal communities to in situ light environments: Methodological considerations. Limnology and Oceanography 38:1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Plante-Cuny, M. R., C. Barranguet, D. Bonn, and C. Grenz. 1993. Does chlorophyllide a reduce reliability of chlorophyll a measurements in marine coastal sediments? Aquatic Science 55:19–30.Google Scholar
  98. Plante-Cuny, M. R. and A. Bodoy. 1987. Biomasse et production primaire du phytoplancton et du microphytobenthos de deux biotopes sableux (Golfe de Fos, France). Oceanology Acta 10:223–237.Google Scholar
  99. Pomeroy, L. R. 1959. Algal productivity in salt marshes of Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 4:386–397.Google Scholar
  100. Propp, M. V., V. G. Tarasoff, I. I. Cherbadgi, and N. V. Lootzik. 1980. Benthic-pelagic oxygen and nutrient exchange in a coastal region of the Sea of Japan, p. 265–284. In K. R. Tenore and B. C. Coull (eds.), Marine Benthic Dynamics. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  101. Rasmussen, M. B., K. Henricksen, and A. Jensen. 1983. Possible causes of temporal fluctuations in primary production of the microphytobenthos in the Danish Wadden Sea. Marine Biology 73:109–114.Google Scholar
  102. Revsbech, N. P., B. B. Jørgensen, T. H. Blackburn, and Y. Cohen. 1983. Microelectrode studies of the photosynthesis and O2, H2S, and pH profiles of a microbial mat. Limnology and Oceanography 28:1062–1074.Google Scholar
  103. Revsbech, N. P., B. B. Jørgensen, and B. B. Brix. 1981. Primary production of microalgae in sediments measured by oxygen microprofile, H14CO3 fixation, and oxygen exchange methods. Limnology and Oceanography 26:717–730.Google Scholar
  104. Riaux, C. 1983. Structure d'un peuplement estuarien de diatomées épipéliques du Nord-Finistére. Oceanologica Acta 6: 173–183.Google Scholar
  105. Riaux-Gobin, C., C. A. Llewellyn, and B. Klein. 1987. Microphytobenthos from two subtidal sediments from North Brittany. II. Variations of pigment compositions and concentrations determined by HPLC and conventional techniques. Marine Ecology Progress Series 40:275–283.Google Scholar
  106. Riaux-Gobin, C., M. V. M. Wafar, and B. Klein. 1993. Production primaire potentielle microphytobenthique d'une slikke de nord Bretagne: Stratifaction verticale. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 169:215–231.Google Scholar
  107. Riznyk, R. Z., J. I. Edens, and R. C. Libby. 1978. Production of epibenthic diatoms in a southern California impounded estuary. Journal of Phycology 14:273–279.Google Scholar
  108. Riznyk, R. Z. and H. K. Phinney. 1972. The distribution of intertidal phytopsammon in an Oregon estuary. Marine Biology 13:318–324.Google Scholar
  109. Rizzo, W. M., G. L. Lackey, and R. R. Christian. 1992. Significance of euphotic, subtidal sediments to oxygen and nutrient cycling in a temperate estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 86: 51–61.Google Scholar
  110. Rizzo, W. M. and R. L. Wetzel. 1985. Intertidal and shoal benthic community metabolism in a temperate estuary: Studies of spatial and temporal scales of variability. Estuaries 8:342–351.Google Scholar
  111. Rodhe, W. 1966. Standard correlations between pelagic photosynthesis and light, p. 365–381. In C. R. Goldman (ed.), Primary Productivity in Aquatic Environments. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  112. Roman, M. R. and K. R. Tenore. 1978. Tidal resuspension in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. I. Seasonal changes in the resuspension of organic carbon and chlorophyll a. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 6:37–46.Google Scholar
  113. Round, F. E. 1979a. A diatom assemblage living below the surface of intertidal sand flats. Marine Biology 54:219–223.Google Scholar
  114. Round, F. E. 1979b. Occurrence and rhythmic behaviour of Tropidoneis lepidoptera in the epipelon of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts, USA. Marine Biology 54:215–217.Google Scholar
  115. Sanford, L. P., W. Panageotou, and J. P. Halka. 1991. Tidal resuspension of sediments in northern Chesapeake Bay. Marine Geology 97:87–103.Google Scholar
  116. Shaffer, G. P. 1984. The effect of sedimentation on the primary production of benthic microflora. Estuaries 7:497–500.Google Scholar
  117. Shaffer, G. P. 1988a. A comparison of benthic microfloral production on the West and Gulf coasts of the United States: An introduction to the dynamic K-systems model. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43:55–62.Google Scholar
  118. Shaffer, G. P. 1988b. K-systems analysis for determining the factors influencing benthic microalgal productivity in a Louisiana estuary, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43:43–54.Google Scholar
  119. Shaffer, G. P. and C. P. Onuf. 1983. An analysis of factors influencing the primary production of the benthic microflora in a southern California lagoon. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 17:126–144.Google Scholar
  120. Shaffer, G. P. and C. P. Onuf. 1985. Reducing the error in estimating annual production of benthic microflora: Hourly to monthly rates, patchiness in space and time. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 26:221–231.Google Scholar
  121. Shaffer, G. P. and M. J. Sullivan. 1988. Water column productivity attributable to displaced benthic diatoms in well-mixed shallow estuaries. Journal of Phycology 24:132–140.Google Scholar
  122. Steele, J. H. and I. E. Baird. 1968. Production ecology of a sandy beach. Limnology and Oceanography 13:14–25.Google Scholar
  123. Sullivan, M. J. 1975. Diatom communities from a Delaware salt marsh. Journal of Phycology 11:384–390.Google Scholar
  124. Sullivan, M. J. and F. C. Daiber. 1975. Light, nitrogen, and phosphorus limitation of edaphic algae in a Delaware salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 18:79–88.Google Scholar
  125. Sullivan, M. and C. Moncreiff 1988. Primary production of edaphic algal communities in a Mississippi salt marsh. Journal of Phycology 24:49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sun, M. Y., R. C. Aller, and C. Lee. 1994. Spatial and temporal distributions of sedimentary chloropigments as indicators of benthic processes in Long Island Sound. Journal of Marine Research 52:149–176.Google Scholar
  127. Sundbäck, K., V. Enoksson, W. Granéli, and K. Pettersson. 1991. Influence of sublittoral microphytobenthos on the oxygen and nutrient flux between sediment and water: A laboratory continuous-flow study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 74: 263–279.Google Scholar
  128. Sundbäck, K. and W. Granéli.. 1988. Influence of microphytobenthos on the nutrient flux between sediment and water: A laboratory study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43:63–69.Google Scholar
  129. Sundbäck, K. and B. Jönsson. 1988. Microphytobenthic productivity and biomass in sublittoral sediments of a stratified bay, southeastern Kattegat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 122:63–81.Google Scholar
  130. Sweerts, J. P., J. W. M. Rudd, and C. A. Kelly. 1986. Metabolic activities in flocculent surface sediments and underlying sandy littoral sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 31:330–338.Google Scholar
  131. Taasen, J. P. and T. Høisæter. 1981. The shallow-water soft-bottom benthos in Lindåspollene, western Norway. 4. Benthic marine diatoms, seasonal density fluctuations. Sarsia 66:293–316.Google Scholar
  132. Taylor, W. R. 1964. Light and photosynthesis in intertidal benthic diatoms. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 10:24–37.Google Scholar
  133. Taylor, W. R. and C. D. Gebelein. 1966. Plant pigments and light penetration in intertidal sediments. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen. 13:229–237.Google Scholar
  134. Tett, P. 1982. The Loch Eil project: Planktonic pigmets in sediments from Loch Eil and the Firth of Lorne. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 56:101–114.Google Scholar
  135. van Es, F. B. 1982. Community metabolism of intertidal flats in the Ems-Dollard estuary. Marine Biology 66:95–108.Google Scholar
  136. van Raalte, C. D., I. Valiela, and J. M. Teal. 1976. Production of benthic salt marsh algae: Light and nutrient limitation. Limnology and Oceanography 21:862–872.Google Scholar
  137. Varela, M. and E. Penas. 1985. Primary production of benthic microalgae in an intertidal sand flat of the Ria de Arosa, NW Spain. Marine Ecology Progress Series 25:111–119.Google Scholar
  138. Von Heukelem, L., A. J. Lewittus, T. M. Kana, and N. E. Craft. 1992. High performance liquid chromatography of phytoplankton pigments using a polymeric reversed phase C18 column. Journal of Phycology 28:867–872.Google Scholar
  139. Walker, T. A. 1981. Dependence of phytoplankton chlorophyll on bottom resuspension in Cleveland Bay, Northern Queensland. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 32: 981–986.Google Scholar
  140. Ward, L. G. 1985. The influence of wind waves and tidal currents on sediment resuspension in middle Chesapeake Bay (and sediment stability relationships to benthos and anoxia). Geo-Marine Letters 5:71–75.Google Scholar
  141. Whitney, D. E. and W. M. Darley. 1979. A method for the determination of chlorophyll a in samples containing degradation products. Limnology and Oceanography 2:183–186.Google Scholar
  142. Whitney, D. E. and W. M. Darley. 1983. Effect of light intensity upon salt marsh benthic microalgal photosynthesis. Marine Biology (Berlin) 75:249–251.Google Scholar
  143. Yager, P. L., A. R. M. Nowell, and P. A. Jumars. 1993. Enhanced deposition to pits: A local food source for benthos. Journal of Marine Research 51:209–236.Google Scholar
  144. Yallop, M. L., B. De Winder, D. M. Paterson, and L. J. Stal. 1994. Comparative structure, primary production, and biogenic stabilization of cohesive and non-cohesive marine sediments inhabited by microphytobenthos. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 39:565–582.Google Scholar
  145. Zedler, J. B. 1980. Algal mat productivity: Comparisons in a salt marsh. Estuaries 3:122–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh L. MacIntyre
    • 1
  • Richard J. Geider
    • 1
  • Douglas C. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate College of Marine StudiesUniversity of DelawareLewes

Personalised recommendations