Estuaries

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 469–478

Spatio-temporal fluctuations in the distribution and abundance of demersal fish and epibenthic crustaceans in Yaquina Bay, Oregon

  • Waldemar A. De Ben
  • William D. Clothier
  • George R. Ditsworth
  • Donald J. Baumgartner
Article

Abstract

A total of over 32,000 demersal fish and epibenthic crustaceans belonging to 62 species were caught in 42 biweekly trawls from 10 stations in Yaquina Bay, Oregon, during 1967 and 1968. English sole,Parophrys vetulus, was the most abundant species. Seventeen species (13 fishes and 4 crustaceans) constituted 95% of the catch. Total numerical abundances of both individuals (mainly juvenile fishes) and species were greatest in the lower 12 km of the estuary during summer and early fall, a period of water mass stability and increased water temperature and salinity. This section of the estuary is used by many immature fishes and crustaceans as a “nursery area”. These fishes generally emigrate from the estuary as subadults in the fall around the onset of the rainy season. The fewest species were taken in January 1968 from the central, upper-estuarine, and riverine areas of the bay, this being a time when high rainfall and river discharge result in low salinity and temperature. Crustaceans (shrimp and subadult crabs) were generally most abundant in late winter and early spring throughout the estuary. Changes in diversity indices reflected variations in community structure, the influence of migratory species and juvenile fishes, and seasonal changes in dominance. Year-to-year fluctuations in abundance may be due, in part, to local hydrographic and meteorological conditions along the central Oregon coast.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, L. G.. 1982. Seasonal abundance, composition, and productivity of the littoral fish assemblage in upper Newport Bay, California.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 80:769–790.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, L. G., andM. H. Horn. 1975. Abundance, diversity and seasonality of fishes in Colorado Lagoon, Alamitos Bay, California.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 3:371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. D., andK. K. Chew. 1972. Preliminary study on the transient species of fish in Big Beef Harbor.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101:726–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D. A., B. G. Stevens, and J. C. Hoeman. 1981. Distribution and abundance of Dungeness Crab and Crangon Shrimp, and dredging-related mortality of invertebrates and fish in Grays Harbor, Washington. Technical Report, Washington Department of Fisheries, United States Corps of Engineers. (Contract No. DACW67-80-C-0086). 349 p.Google Scholar
  5. Bane, G., andM. Robinson. 1970. Studies on the shiner perch,Cymatogaster aggregata Gibbons, in upper Newport Bay, California.Wasmann Journal of Biology 28:259–268.Google Scholar
  6. Bayer, R. D.. 1981. Shallow-water intertidal ichthyofauna of the Yaquina Estuary, Oregon.Northwest Science 55:182–193.Google Scholar
  7. Bechtel, T. J., andB. J. Copeland. 1970. Fish species diversity indices as indicators of pollution in Galveston Bay, Texas.Contributions in Marine Science 15:103–131.Google Scholar
  8. Boehlert, G. W., andB. C. Mundy. 1987. Recruitment dynamics of metamorphosing English sole,Parophrys vetulus, to Yaquina Bay, Oregon.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 25: 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, T. H.. 1980. Shrimps of the Pacific Coast of Canada. Bulletin 202, Department of Fisheries and Oceanography, Ottawa. 280 p.Google Scholar
  10. Cain, R. L., andJ. M. Dean. 1976. Annual occurrences, abundance, and diversity of fish in a South Carolina intertidal creek.Marine Biology 36:369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claridge, P. N., I. C. Potter, andM. W. Hardisty. 1986. Seasonal changes in movements, abundance, size composition and diversity of the fish fauna of the Severn Estuary.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 66: 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahlberg, M. D., andE. P. Odum. 1970. Annual cycles of species occurrence, abundance, and diversity in Georgia estuarine fish populations.American Midlands Naturalist 83:382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frolander, H. F., 1964. Biological and chemical features of tidal estuaries.Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 36:1037–1048.Google Scholar
  14. Gnose, C. E.. 1967. Ecology of the striped seaperch,Embiotoca lateralis, in Yaquina Bay, Oregon, M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 53 p.Google Scholar
  15. Greenberg, A. E., R. R. Trussell, andL. S. Clesceri (eds.). 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 16th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1,268 p.Google Scholar
  16. Haertel, L., andC. Osterberg. 1967. Ecology of zooplankton, benthos and fishes in the Columbia River Estuary.Ecology 48:459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hillman, R. E., N. W. Davis, andJ. Wennemer. 1977. Abundance, diversity, and stability in shore-zone fish communities in an area of Long Island Sound affected by the thermal discharge of a nuclear power station.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5:355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoff, J. G., andR. M. Ibara. 1977. Factors affecting the seasonal abundance, composition and diversity of fishes in a southeastern New England estuary.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5:665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horn, M. H.. 1980. Diel and seasonal variation in abundance and diversity of shallow-water fish populations in Morro Bay, California.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 78:759–770.Google Scholar
  20. Krygier, E. E. andH. F. Horton. 1975. Distribution, reproduction, and growth ofCrangon nigricauda andCrangon franciscorum in Yaquina Bay, Oregon.Northwest Science 49:216–240.Google Scholar
  21. Krygier, E. E. andW. G. Pearcy. 1986. The role of estuarine and offshore nursery areas for young English sole,Parophrys vetulus Girard, of Oregon.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 84:119–132.Google Scholar
  22. LaRoche, J. L. andS. L. Richardson. 1979. Winter-spring abundance of larval English sole,Parophrys vetulus, between the Columbia River and Cape Blanco, Oregon during 1972–1975 with notes on occurrences of three other Pleuronectids.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 8:455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loneragan, N. R., I. C. Potter, R. C. J. Lenanton, andN. Caputi. 1986. Spatial and seasonal differences in the fish fauna in the shallows of a large Australian estuary.Marine Biology 92:575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McErlean, A. J., S. G. O’Connor, J. A. Mihursky andC. I. Gibson. 1973. Abundance, diversity and seasonal patterns of estuarine fish populations.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 1:19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McHugh, J. L. 1966. Management of estuarine fisheries.American Fisheries Society Special Publication 3:133–154.Google Scholar
  26. McHugh, J. L. 1967. Estuarine nekton, p. 581–620.In G. H. Lauff (ed.), Estuaries. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Publication 83, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  27. Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 111 p.Google Scholar
  28. Marriner, J. V., W. H. Kriete, andG. C. Grant. 1976. Seasonality, abundance, and diversity of fishes in the Piankatank River, Virginia (1970–1971).Chesapeake Science 17:238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nash, R. D. M. andR. N. Gibson. 1982. Seasonal fluctuations and compositions of two populations of small demersal fishes on the west coast of Scotland.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 15:485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson, R. E. andI. Pratt. 1973. Parasites as indicators of English sole (Parophrys vetulus) nursery groundsTransactions of the American Fisheries Society 102:405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orcutt, H. G. 1950. The life history of the Starry flounder,Platichthys stellatus (Pallas). California Department of Fish and Game Fishery Bulletin No. 78. 64 p.Google Scholar
  32. Oviatt, C. A. andS. W. Nixon. 1973. The demersal fish of Narragansett Bay: An analysis of community structure, distribution and abundance.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 1:361–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pearcy, W. G. andS. S. Myers. 1974. Larval fishes of Yaquina Bay, Oregon: A nursery ground for marine fishes?.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 72:201–213.Google Scholar
  34. Potter, I. C., P. N. Claridge, andR. M. Warwick. 1986. Consistency of seasonal changes in an estuarine fish assemblage.Marine Ecology Progress Series 32:217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quinn, N. J. 1980. Analysis of temporal changes in fish assemblages in Serpentine Creek, Queensland.Environmental Biology of Fishes 5:117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson, S. L. 1977. Larval fishes in waters off Yaquina Bay, Oregon: Abundance, distribution and seasonality January 1971 to August 1972. Oregon State University Sea Grant College Program Publication ORESU-T-77-003. 73 p.Google Scholar
  37. Richardson, S. L. andW. G. Pearcy. 1977. Coastal and oceanic fish larvae in an area of upwelling off Yaquina Bay, Oregon.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 75:125–145.Google Scholar
  38. Richardson, S. L., J. L. LaRoche, andM. D. Richardson. 1980. Larval fish assemblages and associations in the Northeast Pacific Ocean along the Oregon coast, winter-spring 1972–1975.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 11:671–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robins, C. R., R. M. Bailey, C. E. Bond, J. R. Brooker, E. A. Lachner, R. N. Lea, and W. B. Scott. 1980. List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 12. Bethesda, Maryland. 174 p.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg, A. A. 1982. Growth of juvenile English sole,Parophrys vetulus, in estuarine and open coastal nursery grounds.United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 80:245–252.Google Scholar
  41. Sanders, H. L.. 1960. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. III. The structure of the soft-bottom community.Limnology and Oceanography 5: 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shannon, C. E. andW. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois. 117 p.Google Scholar
  43. Swartz, R. C., D. W. Schults, G. R. Ditsworth, W. A. de Ben, andF. A. Cole. 1985. Sediment toxicity, contamination, and macrobenthic communities near a large sewage outfall, p. 152–175.In T. P. Boyle (ed.), Validation and Predictability of Laboratory Methods for Assessing the Fate and Effects of Contaminants in Aquatic Ecosystems. ASTM STP 865. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  44. Swedberg, C. E. 1966. Age-fecundity relationships in the striped seaperch (Embiotoca lateralis) in Yaquina Bay, Oregon. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 53 p.Google Scholar
  45. United States Department of Commerce. 1970. Environmental Science Services Administration. Climatological Sumary. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Wares, P. G. 1971 Biology of the pile perch,Rhacochilus vacca, in Yaquina Bay, Oregon. United States Bureau of Sports Fisheries and Wildlife Technical Paper 57, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 21 p.Google Scholar
  47. Weinstein, M. P., S. L. Weiss, andM. F. Walters. 1980. Multiple determinants of community structure in shallow marsh habitats, Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina, USA.Marine Biology 58:227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westrheim, S. J. 1955. Size composition, growth and seasonal abundance of juvenile English sole (Parophrys vetulus) in Yaquina Bay.Oregon Fish Commission Research Briefs 6:4–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Waldemar A. De Ben
    • 1
  • William D. Clothier
    • 1
  • George R. Ditsworth
    • 1
  • Donald J. Baumgartner
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Research Laboratory Hatfield Marine Science Center Pacific Ecosystems BranchUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyNewport

Personalised recommendations