Advertisement

Chesapeake Science

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 159–173 | Cite as

Fecal pellets of common invertebrates of lower York River and lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia

  • John Kraeuter
  • Dexter S. Haven
Article

Abstract

Fecal pellets voided by 70 invertebrate species are described, 66 of these for the first time. Pellet size is related to size of animals, and linear regressions are given for two species. Pellet characteristics described are cross-sectional shape, sculpture, differentiation, composition, and shape. The morphology is specific for many animals. However, certain species void feces which are 1) diffuse, 2) morphologically inconsistent, or 3) lack differentiating characteristics.

Keywords

Fecal Pellet Fecal Material Coarse Material Pellet Size Dark Chocolate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. ABBOTT, T. R. 1954. Review of the Atlantic periwinkles,Nodilittorina, Echinius, andTectarius. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 103(3328):449–464.Google Scholar
  2. ARAKAWA, K. Y. 1962. A coprological study on the molluscan feces. A preliminary note.Venus (JapaneseMalacol.) 22:151–172.Google Scholar
  3. — 1963. Studies on the molluscan feces (I).Publ. Seto Mar. Biol. Lab. 11:185–208.Google Scholar
  4. — 1965. Studies on the molluscan feces (II).Publ. Seto. Mar. Biol. Lab. 13:1–21.Google Scholar
  5. BUCHANAN, J. Y. 1890. On the occurrence of sulfur in marine muds and nodules, and its bearing on their mode of formation.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburg 18:17–39.Google Scholar
  6. EDGE, E. R. 1934. Faecal pellets of some marine invertebrates.Amer. Midl. Nat. 15:78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. HAVEN, D. S., and R. MORALES-ALAMO 1965. Apparatus for holding individual oysters under equal water flows.Limnol. Oceanogr. 10:605–606.Google Scholar
  8. — 1966. Aspects of biodeposition by oysters and other invertebrate filter feeders.Limnol. Oceanogr. 11:487–498.Google Scholar
  9. — 1967. Occurrence and transport of fecal pellets in suspension in a tidal estuary.Sed. Geol. 2:141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ITO, S., and T. IMAI. 1955. Ecology of oyster bed I. On the decline of productivity due to repeated cultures.Tokoka J. Agri. Res. 5:9–26.Google Scholar
  11. JOHANNES, R. E., and M. SATOMI. 1966. Composition and nutritive value of fecal pellets of a marine crustacean.Limnol. Oceanogr. 11:191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. KORNICKER, L. A. 1962. Evolutionary trends among mollusk fecal pellets.J. Paleontol. 36:829–832.Google Scholar
  13. — and E. G. PURDY. 1957. A Bahamian faecalpellet sediment.J. Sed. Petrol. 27:126–128.Google Scholar
  14. LUND, E. J. 1953. Self silting by the oyster and its significance for sedimentary geology.Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Univ. Texas 4:320–327.Google Scholar
  15. MANNING, R. B., and H. E. KUMPF. 1959. Preliminary investigation of the fecal pellets of certain invertebrates of South Florida area.Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribbean 9:291–309.Google Scholar
  16. MOORE, H. B. 1931a. The systematic value of a study of molluscan feces.Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 19:281–290.Google Scholar
  17. — 1931b. The specific identification of faecal pellets.J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 17:359–365.Google Scholar
  18. — 1932a. The faecal pellets of the Trochidae.J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K. 18:235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. — 1932b. The faecal pellets of theAnomura.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 52:296–308.Google Scholar
  20. — 1933a. The faecal pellets ofHippa asiatica.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 53:252–254.Google Scholar
  21. — 1933b. The faecal pellets from marine deposits.Discovery Rept. 7:17–26.Google Scholar
  22. MOORE, H. B. 1939. Faecal pellets in relation to marine deposits, p. 516–524.In Recent marine sediments. Society of Economic Paleontology and Mineralology Special Publication 4. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists.Google Scholar
  23. MOORE, H. B., and P. KRUSE. 1956. A review of present knowledge of faecal pellets.Univ. Miami Mar. Lab. ML 13860, 24 p.Google Scholar
  24. RHOADS, D. C. and D. J. STANLEY. 1965. Biogenic graded bedding.J. Sed. Petrol. 35:956–963.Google Scholar
  25. VAN STRAATTEN, L. M. J. U. 1960. Transport and composition of sediments. Symposium Ems-Estuarium (Nordsee)—Verhandel.Koninkl. Ned. Geol. Mijnbouwk. Genoot., Ged. Ser., 19:279–292.Google Scholar
  26. VERWEY, J. 1952. On the ecology of distribution of cockle and mussel in the Dutch Waddensea, their role in sedimentation and the source of their food supply.Arch. Neerland. Zool. 10:171–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Kraeuter
    • 1
  • Dexter S. Haven
    • 2
  1. 1.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceGloucester Point
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations