Chesapeake Science

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 90–100 | Cite as

Nesting ecology and reproductive rate of the red-winged blackbird in tidal marshes of the upper Chesapeake Bay region

  • Brooke Meanley
  • John S. Webb


The nesting ecology and reproductive rate of the polygynous red-winged blackbird,Agelaius phoeniceus, were studied in the tidal marshes of Maryland during the period of 1958 through 1961. Sixteen nesting colonies were located in six major marsh communities of the Eastern Shore and were visited approximately twice a week from late April to mid-August.

The average clutch size for 537 clutches was 3.3, eggs, with a range of 2 to 5 eggs. The ratio of terriotiral males to nesting females was 1:1.9. There was direct evidence of double broods by four females. The average number of young produced was 4.2 per breeding female or 8.1 per breeding male.

Nesting success for the total of 675 active nests was 57%, with a range from 38% to 69% in the colonies. Robust plants that held constant form throughout the nesting season supported 95% of the nests, and the success of these nests was 58%; in contrast, non-robust plants supported only 5% of the nests, and success of this group of nests was only 26%. Nesting success varied with height from ground: 45% for nests less than 2 feet from the ground, 55% for those 2 to 4 feet, and 62% for those more than 4 feet. Histories of 749 nests were summarized by stages: 749 newly built, 675 with eggs, 424 with nestlings, and 388 with fledging young.


Clutch Size Tidal Marsh Nest Success Nest Season Marsh Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, A. A. 1914. The red-winged blackbird: A study in the ecology of a cat-tail marsh.Proc. Linn. Soc. N.Y. 24–25:43–128.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, J. R., andD. Tibbitts. 1950. Nesting behavior of the redwing blackbird.Flicker 22:61–77.Google Scholar
  3. Farner, D. S. 1945. Age groups and longevity in the American robin.Wilson Bull. 57:56–74.Google Scholar
  4. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany, eighth edition.Am. Book Co N. Y. 1632 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Hotchkiss, N. 1950. Check-list of marsh and aquatic plants of the United States.U. S. Dept. Int. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Leaf (210):1–34.Google Scholar
  6. Nero, R. W. 1956. A behavior study of the redwinged blackbird. I. Mating and nesting activities.Wilson Bull. 68:5–37.Google Scholar
  7. — 1956. A behavior study of the redwinged blackbird. II. Territoriality.Wilson Bull. 68:129–50.Google Scholar
  8. Neff, J. A. andB. Meanley. 1957. Blackbirds and the Arkansas rice crop.Ark. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. (584):1–89.Google Scholar
  9. Orians, Gordon H. 1961. The ecology of blackbird (Agelaius) social systems.Ecol. Monogr. 31(3):285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, H. M. 1943. Size of breeding populations in relation to egg-laying and reproductive success in the eastern red-wing (Agelaius p. phoeniceus).Ecology 24:183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Williams, J. F. 1940. The sex ratio in nestling eastern red-wings.Wilson Bull. 52:267–77.Google Scholar
  12. Young, H. 1955. Breeding behavior and nesting of the eastern robin.Am. Midl. Nat. 53:329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brooke Meanley
    • 1
  • John S. Webb
    • 1
  1. 1.Patuxent Wildlife Research CenterU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceLaurel

Personalised recommendations