Chesapeake Science

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 289–292 | Cite as

The distribution ofJuncus roemerianus in the salt marshes of North America

  • Lionel N. Eleuterius
Short Papers and Notes


Although scattered individuals ofJuncus roemerianus Scheele may be found northward in New Jersey, Long Island, New York, Connecticut and southward along the Laguna Madre in Texas, Mexico and on the Caribbean islands, the species is most prevalent along the south Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the eastern United States. Here there are approximately 3,174,333 hectares of salt marsh of which 72.9% occur on the Gulf coast and 27.1% on the Atlantic coast.Juncus roemerianus dominates 20.7% of the marsh in the south Atlantic states and 7.3% of the Gulf coast marshes, but covers more marsh area on the Gulf coast (170,067 hectares) than on the Atlantic coast (149,316 hectares). Thus, there are approximately 320,000 hectares of salt marsh dominated byJ. roemerianus in North America.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Carter, J. F. [1969]. Wetlands Report, New Hampshire Water Resour. Bd. Society for Protection of New Hampshire Forests. 7 p.Google Scholar
  2. Chabreck, R. H. 1970. Marsh zones and vegetative types in the Louisiana coastal marshes. Ph.D. Diss., La. St. Univ., Baton Rouge. 114 p.Google Scholar
  3. Chesmore, A. P., and Allen Peterson, Jr. 1970. Massachusetts estuarine research and protection programs.Trans. 35th North Amer. Wildlife and Natural Res. p. 247–258.Google Scholar
  4. Connecticut Legislative Council. 1969. Supplementary report on preservation of wetlands to the 1969 General Assembly Special Committee to Study Water Resources Problems. 14 p.Google Scholar
  5. Crance, J. H. 1971. Description of Alabama estuarine areas—cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory. Ala. Mar. Res. Bull 6. Ala. Mar. Res. Lab., Dauphin Island. 85 p.Google Scholar
  6. Critcher, T. S. 1967. The wildlife values of North Carolina’s estuarine lands and waters. N. C. Wildlife Res. Comm. 4p.Google Scholar
  7. Division of Fish and Game, Rhode Island Dept. of Agriculture and Conservation. 1965. Rhode Island salt water marsh inventory. 13 p.Google Scholar
  8. Eleuterius, L. N. 1971. Recent changes in the Louisiana marsh near Vermilion Bay.Gulf Research Reports 5(2):259–263.Google Scholar
  9. — 1972. The marshes of Mississippi.Castanea 37: 153–168.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1974. The autecology ofJuncus roemerianus. Ph.D. Diss, Miss. St. Univ., Mississippi State, 221 p.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrigno, F. 1970. Marsh destruction. Ecology of salt marsh and coastal impoundments. State of New Jersey, Project no. W-34-R-15. 17 p.Google Scholar
  12. Hammond, R. A. 1969. Proposed marsh bank program for coastal Georgia. Coastal Area Planning and Devel. Comm. 16 p. and App. B.Google Scholar
  13. Harney, J. E. 1961. Wetlands preservation on Long Island.The New York State Conservationist, p. 1–3.Google Scholar
  14. Maryland State Planning Department. 1970. Draft Report, Wetlands in Maryland. Dept. of Game and Inland Fish and the Wetlands Technical Advisory Committee. Vol. II.Google Scholar
  15. McNulty, J. K., W. N. Lindall and J. E. Sykes. 1972. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory and study Florida: Phase I, Area description. NOAA Technical Report NMFS CIRC-368. U. S. Dept. of Commerce, 127 p.Google Scholar
  16. O’Neil, T. 1949. The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes. La. Dept. of Wild Life and Fisheries. New Orleans. 152 p.Google Scholar
  17. Perret, W. S., B. B. Barrett, W. R. Latapie, J. F. Pollard, W. R. Mock, G. B. Adkins, W. J. Gaidry andC. J. White. 1971. Cooperative Gulf of Mexico estuarine inventory and study, Louisiana. Phase I, Area description. Louisiana Wild Life and Fisheries Commission. New Orleans. 175 p.Google Scholar
  18. South Carolina Water Resources Commission. 1970. South Carolina Tidelands Report. 178 p.Google Scholar
  19. Spinner, G. P. 1969. The wildlife wetlands and shellfish areas of the Atlantic coastal zone.American Geographical Society. 2 p. and 12 plate map folio.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, R. E., andJ. G. Gosselink. 1975. A note on the standing crops ofSpartina alterniflora in Texas and Florida.Contrib. Mar. Sci. 19:111–118.Google Scholar
  21. Wass, M. L., and T. D. Wright. 1969. Coastal wetlands of Virginia. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No. 10. 154 p.Google Scholar
  22. Williams, R. B., andM. B. Murdoch. 1972. Compartmental analysis of the production ofJuncus roemerianus in North Carolina salt marsh.Chesapeake Sci. 13(2):69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilson, K. A. 1968. Fur production on southeastern coastal marshes. Proc. Marsh and Estuary Manag. Symp., La. St. Univ., Baton Rouge. p. 149–171.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson, K. A. 1972. North Carolina wetlands: their distribution and management. North Carolina Wildlife Res. Comm. 169 p.Google Scholar
  25. Wallace, D. B., and R. B. Parks. [1967]. Maine legislature enacts a coastal wetlands law. [mimeograph] Maine Dept. of Sea and Shore Fisheries. 6 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lionel N. Eleuterius
    • 1
  1. 1.Gulf Coast Research LaboratoryOcean Springs

Personalised recommendations