Advertisement

Chesapeake Science

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 73–93 | Cite as

The striped bass fishery in the Atlantic states

  • Ted S. Y. Koo
Article

Abstract

Commerical landings of striped bass on the Atlantic coast of America were reviewed briefly for the period prior to 1930 and analyzed in some detail from 1930 to 1966. From the lowest level of barely over 1 million pounds in 1934, annual landings for the entire coast have increased ninefold at the present level.

Catch statistics and fluctuations in landings were analyzed according to regions and states. Chesapeake region, comprising Maryland and Virginia, landed two-thirds of the total catch. The fluctuations in Chesapeake landings were paralleled by Middle Atlantic and New England regions, but with a two-year lag. This was attributed to the fact that the main source of striped bass to all three regions was from the same Chesapeake stock. North Carolina, which is the sole contributor to South Atlantic region in striped landings, had its own distinctive fluctuation pattern.

Fishing gears used in catching striped bass vary from state to state. Handlines are the only gear that land striped bass for commercial market in Massachuestts. Floating traps land the major portion in Rhode Island. Haul seines are the mainstay in New York, as are otter trawls in New Jersey and fixed gillnets in Delaware. Fixed gillnets are also the most important gear in Maryland and North Carolina, although drift gillnets, pound nets, and haul seines contribute significantly to the fishery. In Virginia, pound nets, haul seines, and fixed gillnets each land about 30% of the total poundage.

Seasonal landing patterns differ from state to state. In Massachusetts, the striped bass fishery is primarily a summer fishery; in New York, a fall fishery; in New Jersey, a winter fishery. In Maryland and Virginia, the peak of landings occurs in March and April, just prior to the striped bass spawning season. In North Carolina, good landings are made from November to April.

It has not been possible to calculate catch-per-unit-effort due to lack of necessary data, but the catch-per-unit-gear was calculated and analyzed for a representative state in each region. In all cases, fluctuations in landings were much more closely related to catch-per-unit-gear than to amount of gear.

The cyclic nature of high and low years in Maryland landings was recognized. Dominant year classes seemed to occur at six-year intervals, and possible causes were discussed.

Keywords

Atlantic Coast Striped Bass Fishing Gear Commercial Landing Atlantic State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. BIGELOW, HENRY B., and W. W. WELSH. 1925. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine.Bull. U. S. Bur. Fish., 40: 567 p.Google Scholar
  2. CHADWICK, HAROLD K. 1969. An evaluation of striped bass angling regulations based on an equilibrium yield model.Calif. Fish. and Game, 55(1): 12–19.Google Scholar
  3. CLARK, JOHN. 1968. Seasonal movements of striped bass contingents of long Island Sound and the New York bight.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 97(4): 320–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DEUEL, DAVID G., and JOHN R. CLARK. 1968. The 1965 Salt-Water Angling Survey.Bur. of Sport Fish. and Wildlife Resource Publ. 67: 51 p.Google Scholar
  5. HOLLIS, E. H. 1952. Variations in the feeding habits of the striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum), in Chesapeake Bay.Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 14(1): 111–131.Google Scholar
  6. MANSUETI, ROMEO J. 1961. Effects of civilization on striped bass and other estuarine biota in Chesapeake Bay and tributaries.Proc. Gulf and Carib. Fish. Inst. 14th Annual Ses: 110–136.Google Scholar
  7. MERRIMAN, DANIEL. 1941. Studies on the striped bass (Roccus saxatitis) of the Atlantic Coast.U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Fish. Bull. 35: 77 p.Google Scholar
  8. NICHOLS, P. R., and R. V. Miller. 1967. Seasonal movement of striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum), tagged and released in the Potomac River, Maryland, 1959–61.Chesapeake Sci. 8(2): 102–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. PEARSON, JOHN C. 1938. The life history of the striped bass, or rockfish,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum).U. S. Bur. of Fish. Bull. No. 28. 49: 825–851.Google Scholar
  10. RANEY, E. C. 1952. The life history of the striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum).Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 14(1): 5–97.Google Scholar
  11. RICKER, W. E. 1940. Relation of “catch per unit effort” to abundance and rate of exploitation.J Fish. Res. Bd. Canada. 5: 43–70.Google Scholar
  12. — 1954. Stock and recruitmentIbid.. 11(5): 559–623.Google Scholar
  13. SCHAEFER, RICHARD H. 1968. Size, age, composition, and migration of striped bass from the surf waters of Long Island.N. Y. Fish and Game Jour. 15(11): 1–51.Google Scholar
  14. TILLER, R. E. 1950. A five-year study of the striped bass fishery of Maryland, based on analyses of the scales.Chesapeake Biol. Lab. Publ. 85: 30 p.Google Scholar
  15. VLADYKOV, V. D., and D. H. WALLACE. 1952. Studies of striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum), with special reference to the Chesapeake Bay region during 1936–1938.Bull. Bingham Oceanog. Coll. 14(1): 132–177.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted S. Y. Koo
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural Resources Institute Chesapeake Biological LaboratoryUniversity of MarylandSolomons

Personalised recommendations