Advertisement

Chesapeake Science

, Volume 1, Issue 3–4, pp 168–177 | Cite as

Zoeal stages of the stone crab,Menippe mercenaria Say

  • Hugh J. Porter
Article

Abstract

Larvae of the stone crab,Menippe mercenaria Say, were reared from egg to a true crab stage in 27 days on a diet ofArtemia nauplii. They were successfully cultured in swarms and placed in small compartments where their individual development was studied. Six zoeal stages were found and described, although only five are believed to occur normally in nature. One molt per zoeal stage was noted, and from 3 to 6 days were spent in each stage. Pre-zoeae were observed but these did not molt into a first stage. Such diagnostic characters as size and shape of antennae, and segment and seta numbers of endopodites, maxillules, maxillae and second maxillipeds, were constant in all zoeal stages. Telson appearance and chromatophore occurrence may also be helpful in identification. Comparisons were also made between known xanthid zoeae andMenippe zoeae. Experiments on salinity and temperature tolerance of the zoeae indicate that in a temperature range of 23 to 25°C, zoeae may not be able to survive in salinities of 27‰ or lower.

Keywords

Posterior Margin Blue Crab Abdominal Segment Plumose Seta Zoeal Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aikawa, H.. 1929. On larval forms of some Brachyura.Rec. Oceanogr. Wks. Japan 2:17–55.Google Scholar
  2. — 1937. Further notes on brachyuran larvae.Rec. Oceanogr. Wks. Japan 9(1):87–162.Google Scholar
  3. Binford, R. 1912. The germ cells and the process of fertilization in the crab,Menippe mercenaria. Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins Univ. 51 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Broad, A. C.. 1957. The relationship between diet and larval development ofPalaemonetes.Biol. Bull. 112:162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannon, H. G. 1937. A new biological stain for general purposes.Nature. 139–549.Google Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, N. A. 1957. Larval development of the mud crab,Neopanope texana sayi (Smith).Biol. Bull. 113:338.Google Scholar
  7. Connolly C. J.. 1925. The larval stages and megalops ofRhithropanopeus harrisi, (Gould).Contr. Canad. Biol. N. S. 2(15):327–34.Google Scholar
  8. Costlow, J. D., Jr. andC. G. Bookhout. 1959. The larval development ofCallinectes sapidus Rathbun reared in the laboratory.Biol. Bull. 116:373–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, J.. 1935. The larval development of British Columbia Brachyura. I: Xanthidae, Pinnotheridae (in part) and Grapsidae.Canad. Jour. Res. 12:411–32.Google Scholar
  10. Hay, W. P. andC. A. Shore. 1918. The decapod crustaceans of Beaufort, N. C.,U. S. Bur. Fish. Bull. 35:371–475.Google Scholar
  11. Hyman, O. W.. 1925. Studies on the larvae of crabs of the family Xanthidae.Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 67(Art. 3):1–22.Google Scholar
  12. Lebour, M. V. 1922. The larval stages of the Plymouth Brachyura.Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 473–560.Google Scholar
  13. Rathbun, Mary J. 1930. The Cancroid crabs of America of the families Euryalidae, Portunidae, Atelecyclidae, Cancridae and Xanthidae.U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. (152):1–699.Google Scholar
  14. Rees, G. H. 1959. Larval development of the sand crab,Emerita talpoida (Say), in the laboratory.Biol. Bull. 117:356–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thompson, T. E. 1958. Observations on the radula ofAdalaria proxima.Proc. Malacological Soc. London, 33(2):49–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh J. Porter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Fisheries ResearchUniversity of North CarolinaMorehead City

Personalised recommendations