Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Low-Dose Ritonavir on Danoprevir Pharmacokinetics

Results of Computer-Based Simulations and a Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Danoprevir, a potent, selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) Clinical studies in HCV patients have shown a potential need for a high danoprevir daily dose and/or dosing frequency. Ritonavir, an HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI) and potent CYP3 A inhibitor, is used as a pharmacokinetic enhancer at subtherapeutic doses in combination with other HIV PIs. Coadministering danoprevir with ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer could allow reduced danoprevir doses and/or dosing frequency. Here we evaluate the impact of ritonavir on danoprevir pharmacokinetics.

Methods

The effects of low-dose ritonavir on danoprevir pharmacokinetics were simulated using Simcyp, a population-based simulator. Following results from this drug-drug interaction (DDI) model, a crossover study was performed in healthy volunteers to investigate the effects of acute and repeat dosing of low-dose ritonavir on danoprevir single-dose pharmacokinetics. Volunteers received a single oral dose of danoprevir 100 mg in a fixed sequence as follows: alone, and on the first day and the last day of 10-day dosing with ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours.

Results

The initial DDI model predicted that following multiple dosing of ritonavir 100 mg every 12 hours for 10 days, the danoprevir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 24 hours and maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) would increase by about 3.9- and 3.2-fold, respectively. The clinical results at day 10 of ritonavir dosing showed that the plasma drug concentration at 12 hours postdose, AUC from time zero to infinity and Cmax of danoprevir increased by approximately 42-fold, 5.5-fold and 3.2-fold, respectively, compared with danoprevir alone. The DDI model was refined with the clinical data and sensitivity analyses were performed to better understand factors impacting the ritonavir-danoprevir interaction.

Conclusion

DDI model simulations predicted that danoprevir exposures could be successfully enhanced with ritonavir coadministration, and that a clinical study confirming this result was warranted. The clinical results demonstrate that low-dose ritonavir enhances the pharmacokinetic profile of low-dose danoprevir such that overall danoprevir exposures can be reduced while sustaining danoprevir trough concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seiwert SD, Andrews SW, Jiang Y, et al. Preclinical characteristics of the hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease inhibitor ITMN-191 (R7227). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008 Dec; 52(12): 4432–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradford WZ, Rubino C, Porter S, et al. A phase 1 study of the safety, toler-ability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending oral doses of the NS3/4A protease inhibitor ITMN-191 in healthy subjects [abstract]. Hepatology 2008 Oct; 48 Suppl. 1: 1146A

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rubino C, Bradford WZ, Forrest A, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships for ITMN-191 in a phase 1 multiple ascending dose trial in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection [abstract]. Hepatology 2008 Oct; 48 Suppl. 2: 1140A–1A

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forestier N, Larrey DG, Guyader D, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) leads to robust reductions in viral RNA: a phase 1b multiple ascending dose study. J Hepatol 2011 Jun; 54: 1130–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Forestier N, Larrey D, Marcellin P, et al. Antiviral activity and safety of ITMN-191 in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic C virus (HCV) [abstract]. J Hepatol 2009; 50 Suppl. 1: S35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Terrault N, Cooper C, Balart LA, et al. Phase II randomised, partially-blind, parallel-group study of oral danoprevir (RG7227) with PegIFN α-2a (PEGASYS®) plus ribavirin in treatment-naive genotype 1 patients with CHC: results of planned week 12 interim analysis of the ATLAS study [abstract]. Hepatology 2010 Oct; 52 Suppl. 4: 335A

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levi M, Frey N, Hsu JC, et al. High exposure to danoprevir (RG7227) increases the probability of ALT elevations in patients treated with danoprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS®) plus ribavirin [abstract]. Hepatology 2010 Oct; 52 Suppl. 4: 1216A

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zeldin RK, Petruschke RA. Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004 Jan; 53(1): 4–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moyle GJ, Back D. Principles and practice of HIV-protease inhibitor pharmacoenhancement. HIV Med 2001 Apr; 2(2): 105–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Foisy MM, Yakiwchuk EM, Hughes CA. Induction effects of ritonavir: implications for drug interactions. Ann Pharmacother 2008 Jul; 42(7): 1048–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Data on file, Roche, 2009

  12. Grime KH, Bird J, Ferguson D, et al. Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes: an evaluation of early decision making in vitro approaches and drug-drug interaction prediction methods. Eur J Pharm Sci 2009 Feb 15; 36(2–3): 175–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simcyp. A guide for IVIVE and PBPK modelling using the Simcyp population-based ADME simulator. Sheffield: Simcyp Limited, 2010: 394

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang JS, Jamei M, Yeo KR, et al. Prediction of intestinal first-pass drug metabolism. Curr Drug Metab 2007 Oct; 8: 676–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gao H, Steyn SJ, Chang G, et al. Assessment of in silico models for fraction of unbound drug in human liver microsomes. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2010 May; 6(5): 533–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner DB, Yeo KR, Tucker GT, et al. Prediction of non-specific hepatic microsomal binding from readily available physicochemical properties [abstract no. A231]. Drug Metab Rev 2006; 38(1): 162

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cozza KL, Armstrong SC, Oesterheld JR. Concise guide to drug interaction principles for medical practice: cytochrome P450s, UGTs, P-glycoproteins. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003 Jan

    Google Scholar 

  18. Almond L, Yeo KR, Howgate E, et al. Mechanistic prediction of HIV drug-drug interactions in virtual populations from in vitro enzyme kinetic data: ritonavir and saquinavir. International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy, Budapest, Hungary, 16th–18th April 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.simcyp.com/UploadedFiles/154/Lisa_Almond_2007_Budapest_SQVr_finalised.pdf [Accessed 2011 Nov 10]

  19. Hyland R, Dickins M, Collins C, et al. Maraviroc: in vitro assessment of drug-drug interaction potential. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008 Oct; 66: 498–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Annaert P, Ye ZW, Stieger B, et al. Interaction of HIV protease inhibitors with OATP1B1, 1B3, and 2B1. Xenobiotica 2010; 40: 163–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson A, Watson V, Back D, et al. Plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir once daily and raltegravir once and twice daily in HIV-infected individuals. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011 Dec 15; 58(5): 450–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang YH. Confidence assessment of the Simcyp time-based approach and a static mathematical model in predicting clinical drug-drug interactions for me-chanism-based CYP3A inhibitors. Drug Metab Dispos 2010 Apr; 38: 1094–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gane EJ, Rouzier R, Stedman C, et al. Antiviral activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of danoprevir/ritonavir plus PEG-IFN α-2a/RBV in hepatitis C patients. J Hepatol 2011 Nov; 55(5): 972–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gabrielsson J, Weiner D. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis: concepts and applications. 4th ed. Stockholm: Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, 2007 Jul

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mathias AA, German P, Murray BP, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GS-9350: a novel pharmacokinetic enhancer without anti-HIV activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010 Mar; 87(3): 322–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hill A, van der Lugt J, Sawyer W, et al. How much ritonavir is needed to boost protease inhibitors? Systematic review of 17 dose-ranging pharmacokinetic trials. AIDS 2009 Nov 13; 23(17): 2237–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu A, Granneman GR, Bertz RJ. Ritonavir: clinical pharmacokinetics and interactions with other anti-HIV agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998 Oct; 35: 275–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenny JR, McGinnity DF, Grime K, et al. Utilization of in vitro cytochrome P450 inhibition data for projecting clinical drug-drug interactions. In: Gad SC, editor. Preclinical development handbook: ADME and biopharmaceutical properties. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley, 2008 Aug: 775–828

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Poirier A, Cascais AC, Funk C, et al. Prediction of pharmacokinetic profile of valsartan in human based on in vitro uptake transport data. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2009; 36: 585–611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Watanabe T, Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y. Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and clearance concept to drugs showing trans-porter-mediated distribution and clearance in humans. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2010 Dec; 37(6): 575–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reesink HW, Zeuzem S, Weegink CJ, et al. Rapid decline of viral RNA in hepatitis C patients treated with VX-950: a phase Ib, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Gastroenterology 2006 Oct; 131: 997–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Forestier N, Larrey D, Marcellin P, et al. Antiviral activity of danoprevir (ITMN-191/RG7227) in combination with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin in patients with hepatitis J Infect Dis 2011 Aug; 204: 601–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors were employees at Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. at the time this work was completed. Micaela Reddy, Jennifer Fretland and Patrick Smith are current employees at Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. Yuan Chen, Joshua Haznedar and Steven Blotner are current employees at Roche/Genentech. Joshua Haznedar owns stock in Roche. All authors have contributed to the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. This study was supported by Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by Hoffmann-La Roche. The authors thank Drs Karin Jorga, Thierry Lave and Li Yu for providing valuable insight during the preparation of this manuscript. Additionally, we thank Dr Petra Goelzer for sharing her knowledge of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micaela B. Reddy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, M.B., Chen, Y., Haznedar, J.Ö. et al. Impact of Low-Dose Ritonavir on Danoprevir Pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 51, 457–465 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11599700-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11599700-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation