Skip to main content

The Authors’ Response

Part II

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Bishop D, Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A. Repeated-sprint ability: part II. Recommendations for training. Sports Med 2011; 41: 741–56

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buchheit M. Repeated-sprint performance in team sport players:associations with measures of aerobic fitness, metabolic control and locomotor function. Int J Sports Med. In press

  3. 3.

    Tuimil J, Boullosa D, Fernández-del-Olmo M, et al. Effect of equated continuous and interval running programs on endurance performance and jump capacity. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2205–11

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Repeated-sprint ability: part I. Factors contributing to fatigue. Sports Med 2011; 41: 673–94

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McGawley K, Bishop D. Reliability of a 5 -6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 98: 383–93

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bishop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, D., Girard, O. The Authors’ Response. Sports Med 42, 172–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11598300-000000000-00000

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aerobic Fitness
  • Interval Training
  • Sprint Performance
  • Repeated Sprint
  • Sprint Training