Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)

Educating the Prescriber

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstrac

The US FDA Amendments Act of 2007 was signed into law on 27 September 2007. A provision of this law granted the FDA new powers to enhance drug safety by requiring the pharmaceutical industry to develop Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). REMS are deemed necessary when a question exists as to whether the benefits of a drug outweigh its risks. REMS constitute a safety plan with several potential components, including a medication guide, a communication plan, elements to ensure safe use and an implementation system to help guide the prescribers, pharmacists and patients. This applies to existing drugs on the market, new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated NDAs (generics) and biologics licence applications. REMS represent an ‘upgrade’ from previously required risk minimization action plans, based on the strengthening of FDA powers of authority and enforceability to incur monetary penalties against individuals representing the pharmaceutical industry who fail to comply.

For illustrative purposes, we chose the drug romiplostim (Nplate®) to present an REMS, as all components were utilized to help assuage risks associated with the drug. Romiplostim is an FDA-approved drug used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura that has a significant adverse safety profile based on the risk of changes in bone marrow reticulin formation and bone marrow fibroses, and other associated risks.

This review of current REMS policy is intended to provide the prescriber with a better understanding of current modalities in FDA-mandated drug safety programmes, which will impact day-to-day healthcare provider practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for industry: format and content of proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS assessments, and proposed REMS modifications: draft guidance. September 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM184128.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration. Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS). Last updated Aug 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/default.htm [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  3. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration. Potential signals of serious risks/new safety information identified from the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS). Last updated April 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/UCM082196 [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  4. Olsen AK, Whalen MD. Public perceptions of the pharmaceutical industry and drug safety: implications for the pharmacovigilance professional and the culture of safety. Drug Saf 2009; 32: 805–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leiderman DB. Risk management of drug products and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration: evolution and context. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 105: S9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anticipating REMS. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008; 7: 963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on risk management systems for medicinal products for human use. November 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.pharmacoepi.org/riskmgmt/emea100505.pdf [Accessed 2011 Nov 15]

  8. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). Last updated May 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm111350.htm [Accessed 2011 Nov 15]

  9. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for industry: medication guides —distribution requirements and inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS): draft guidance. February 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM244570.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  10. Levaquin (levofloxacin) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). Raritan (NJ): Ortho McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/UCM150613.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  11. Khaliq Y, Zhanel GG. Fluoroquinolone-associated tendinopathy: a critical review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1404–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Information for healthcare professionals: fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drugs [ciprofloxacin (marketed as Cipro and generic ciprofloxacin), ciprofloxacin extended-release (marketed as Cipro XR and Proquin XR), gemifloxacin (marketed as Factive), levofloxacin (marketed as Levaquin), moxifloxacin (marketed as Avelox), norfloxacin (marketed as Noroxin), and ofloxacin (marketed as Floxin)]. Last updated 2010 Mar 29 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm126085.htm [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  13. Cipro (ciprofloxacin) [medication guide]. Kenilworth (NJ): Schering-Plough, 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/019537s69,19847s43,19857s50,20780s27CiproMedG.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  14. Avelox (moxifloxacin hydrochloride) [medication guide]. Kenilworth (NJ): Schering-Plough, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.avelox.com/html/pdf/avelox_medguide.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  15. Factive (gemifloxacin) [medication guide]. Cary (NC): Cornerstone Therapeutics Inc., 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM152723.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  16. Noroxin (norfloxacin) [medication guide]. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck & Co., Inc., 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/n/noroxin/noroxin_ppi.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  17. US Food and Drug Administration. Questions and answers on guidance for industry: medication guides. Distribution requirements and inclusion in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm248459.htm [Accessed 2011 Aug 30]

  18. Jamali F, Lemery S, Ayalew K, et al. Romiplostim for the treatment of chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura. Oncology (Williston Park) 2009; 23: 704–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nplate Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy. Thousand Oaks (CA): Amgen Inc., 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm129516.pdf [Accessed 2011 May 10]

  20. Sloan PA. Opioid risk management: understanding FDA mandated risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS). J Opioid Manag 2009; 5: 131–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Henningfield JE, Schuster CR. Risk management and postmarketing surveillance of CNS drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 105 Suppl. 1: S56–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormick CG, Henningfield JE, Haddox JD, et al. Case histories in pharmaceutical risk management. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 105 Suppl 1: S42–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. US Food and Drug Administration. Opioid drugs and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/InformationbyDrugClass/ucm163647.htm [Accessed 2011 Aug 30]

  24. Andrews EB, Kaye JA, Van BC. The REMS publication paradox. Oncology 2009; 23: 715–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Susan C. Nicholson, MD, is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA; Janet Peterson, PhD, and Behin Yektashenas, PharmD, are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.

The authors would like to acknowledge medical writing support for the preparation of this article provided by Ira Mills, PhD, and Craig Ornstein, PhD, both of Embryon, Somerville, NJ, USA. This assistance was funded by Janssen Pharmaceuticals Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA, and Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan C. Nicholson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicholson, S.C., Peterson, J. & Yektashenas, B. Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). Drug Saf 35, 91–104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11597840-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11597840-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation