Resistance training (RT) is now an integral component of a well rounded exercise programme. For a correct training prescription, it is of the utmost importance to understand the interaction among training variables, such as the load, volume, rest interval between sets and exercises, frequency of sessions, exercise modality, repetition velocity and, finally, exercise order. Sports medicine research has indicated that exercise order is an important variable that affects both acute responses and chronic adaptations to RT programmes. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to analyse and discuss exercise order with relevance to acute responses (e.g. repetition performance) and also the expression of chronic adaptable characteristics (e.g. maximal strength and hypertrophy). To accomplish this purpose, the Scielo, Science Citation Index, National Library of Medicine, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus™ and CINAHL® databases were accessed to locate previously conducted original scientific investigations. The studies reviewed examined both acute responses and chronic adaptations with exercise order as the experimental variable. Generally, with relevance to acute responses, a key finding was that exercise order affects repetition performance over multiple sets, indicating that the total repetitions, and thus the volume, is greater when an exercise is placed at the beginning of an RT session, regardless of the relative amount of muscle mass involved. The pre-exhaustion method might not be an effective technique to increase the extent of neuromuscular recruitment for larger muscle groups (e.g. pectoralis major for the bench press) when preceded by a single-joint movement (e.g. pec-deck fly). With relevance to localized muscular endurance performance, oxygen consumption and ratings of perceived exertion, the limited amount of research conducted thus far indicates that exercise order does not appear to impact the acute expression of these variables. In terms of chronic adaptations, greater strength increases were evident by untrained subjects for the first exercise of a given sequence, while strength increases were inhibited for the last exercise of a given sequence. Additionally, based on strength and hypertrophy (i.e. muscle thickness and volume) effect-size data, the research suggests that exercises be ordered based on priority of importance as dictated by the training goal of a programme, irrespective of whether the exercise involves a relatively large or small muscle group. In summary, exercise order is an important variable that should receive greater attention in RT prescription. When prescribed appropriately with other key prescriptive variables (i.e. load, volume, rest interval between sets and exercises), the exercise order can influence the efficiency, safety and ultimate effectiveness of an RT programme.
Resistance Training Bench Press Triceps Brachii Large Muscle Group Total Repetition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review. No funding was used to assist in the preparation of this review.
American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 364–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand on progression models in resistance training for healthyadults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Salles BF, Simão R, Miranda F, et al. Rest interval between sets in strength training. Sport Med 2009; 39:765–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellezza PA, Hall EE, Miller PC, et al. The influence of exercise order on blood lactate, perceptual, and affective responses.J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 203–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennecke A, Guimarã es TM, Leone R, et al. Exercise performed with and without the pre-exhaustion method.J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1933–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farinatti PTV, Simão R, Monteiro WD, et al. Influence of exercise order on oxygen uptake during strength training inyoung women. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1037–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentil P, Oliveira E, Rocha Júnior VA, et al. Effects of exercise order on upper-body muscle activation and exerciseperformance. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 1082–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
Miranda H, Simão R, Vigário PS, et al. Exercise order interacts with rest interval during upper body resistance exercise.J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 1573–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro W, Simão R, Farinatti PTV. Manipulation of exercise order and its influence on the number of repetitionsand effort subjective perception in trained women. Braz JSports Med 2005; 11: 146–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sforzo GA, Touey PR. Manipulating exercise order affects muscular performance during a resistance exercise trainingsession. J Strength Cond Res 1996; 10: 20–4Google Scholar
Silva NSL, Monteiro WD, Farinatti PTV. Influence of exercise order on the number of repetitions and perceivedexertion in young and older women. Braz J Sports Med 2009; 15: 219–23Google Scholar
Simão R, Farinatti PTV, Polito MD, et al. Influence of exercise order on the number of repetitions performed andperceived exertion during resistance exercises. J StrengthCond Res 2005; 19: 152–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
Simão R, Farinatti PTV, Polito MD, et al. Influence of exercise order on the number of repetitions performed andperceived exertion during resistance exercise in women.J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 23–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreuwenberg LPB, Kraemer WJ, Spiering BA, et al. Influence of exercise order in a resistance-training exercise session.J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 141–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dias I, De Salles BF, Novaes J, et al. Influence of exercise order on maximum strength in untrained young men. J SciMed Sport 2010; 13: 65–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simão R, Spineti J, De Salles BF, et al. Influence of exercise order on maximum strength and muscle thickness in untrainedman. J Sport Sci Med 2010; 9: 1–7Google Scholar
Spineti J, De Salles BF, Rhea MR, et al. Influence of exercise order on maximum strength and muscle volume in nonlinearperiodized resistance training. J Strength Con Res 2010; 11: 2962–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone MH, Wilson D. Resistive training and selected effects. Med Clin N Am 1985; 69: 109–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ploutz-Snyder LL, Giamis EL. Orientation and familiarization to 1RM strength testing in old and young women.J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 519–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
Augustsson J, Thommé R, Hornstedt P, et al. Effect of preexhaustion exercise on lower-extremity muscle activationduring a leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17:411–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
da Silva RL, Brentano MA, Kruel LFM. Effects of different strength training methods on postexercise energetic expenditure.J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2255–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagally KM, Robertson RJ. Construct validity of the OMNI Resistance Exercise Scale. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 252–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lagally KM, Robertson KI, Gallagher R, et al. Ratings of perceived exertion during low and high-intensity resistanceexercise by young adults. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 94:723–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pierce K, Rozenek R, Stone MH. Effects of high volume weight training on lactate, heart hate and perceived exertion.J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7: 211–5Google Scholar
Lagally KM, Robertson KI, Gallagher FL, et al. Perceived exertion, electromyography, and blood lactate duringacute bouts of resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 552–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagally KM, McCaw ST, Young GT, et al. Ratings of perceived exertion and muscle activity during the bench pressexercise in recreational and novice lifters. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 359–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effectsize. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 918–20PubMedGoogle Scholar