Advertisement

Clinical Drug Investigation

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 155–167 | Cite as

Pharmacokinetics of Venlafaxine Extended Release 75 mg and Desvenlafaxine 50 mg in Healthy CYP2D6 Extensive and Poor Metabolizers

A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period, Parallel-Group, Crossover Study
  • Alice I. NicholsEmail author
  • Kristen Focht
  • Qin Jiang
  • Sheldon H. Preskorn
  • Cecelia P. Kane
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Genetically driven variations in the level of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 metabolic activity have been shown to significantly affect the pharmacokinetic behaviour of medications that are substrates of this enzyme.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer (EM) and poor metabolizer (PM) phenotypes on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of venlafaxine extended release (ER) and desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate).

Methods

This study used a randomized, open-label, two-period, parallel-group, crossover design. The enrolled healthy subjects participated in the study for approximately 8 weeks, which included ≤6 weeks of screening procedures and two separate 1-week partial inpatient confinement periods (separated by a 4-day washout period), during which venlafaxine ER or desvenlafaxine was administered and blood samples were collected. Subjects were admitted to partial inpatient confinement in a laboratory setting for the two separate study periods where each study drug was individually administered. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected during the 120 hours following administration of each study drug. Plasma concentrations of the study drugs were measured by a third-party analyst using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Healthy subjects were recruited through newspaper advertisements and genotyped to determine their CYP2D6 metabolic phenotype (i.e. EM or PM) using internally developed and commercially available assays. Subjects were reimbursed for their participation in this study. Single, sequentially administered oral doses of the dual-acting, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibiting antidepressants venlafaxine ER (75 mg) and desvenlafaxine (50 mg) were administered. The main outcome measures were differences in the geometric means for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) between EMs and PMs. Comparisons were made using a 2-tailed Wilcoxon exact test.

Results

No carryover effect was observed between treatment sequence groups. There was no statistically significant difference in either Cmax or AUC of O-desmethylvenlafaxine between PMs (n = 7) and EMs (n=7) following administration of desvenlafaxine 50 mg. However, when subjects received venlafaxine ER 75 mg, the AUC and Cmax of O-desmethylvenlafaxine (the primary active metabolite) were 445% and 434% higher, respectively, in EMs compared with PMs (p ≤ 0.001), and the AUC and Cmax of venlafaxine were 445% and 180% higher, respectively, in PMs compared with EMs (p<0.01). In addition, the ratios of O-desmethylvenlafaxine: venlafaxine AUC and Cmax for subjects receiving venlafaxine ER 75 mg were higher for EMs (6.2 and 3.3) than PMs (0.21 and 0.22; p ≤ 0.001 for both comparisons).

Conclusion

In contrast to venlafaxine ER 75 mg, the pharmacokinetics of desvenlafaxine 50 mg is not significantly impacted by CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms. PMs receiving venlafaxine ER 75 mg had significantly lower O-desmethylvenlafaxine and higher venlafaxine plasma concentrations.

Keywords

Venlafaxine Poor Metabolizer Extensive Metabolizer Nadolol Vasovagal Syncope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr Nichols is a full-time employee of Pfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth Research. Dr Nichols has received stock options from Pfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth Research, as part of a long-term incentive plan. Dr Kane is a former Pfizer employee. Dr Kane has received stock options from Pfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth Research, as part of a long-term incentive plan. Ms Focht and Ms Jiang are full-time employees of Pfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth Research. Dr Preskorn has received grants/research support from AstraZeneca, Biovail, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cyberonics, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eli Lilly, EnVivo, GlaxoSmithKline, Link Medicine, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sonexa Therapeutics, Targacept, Trimel Biopharma, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and Wyeth. He has been a consultant or served on advisory boards for Allergan, Auspex, Covidien, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Evotec, Lundbeck/Takeda, Psylin and Wyeth. Dr Preskorn has served on a speakers’ bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb. He has no equity holding valued at over $US10 000. The authors would like to thank Michael Burczynski, PhD, formerly of Wyeth Research, for his substantial contributions to the development of this manuscript.

This study was sponsored by Wyeth Research, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc, in October 2009. Medical writing support for this manuscript was provided by Dennis Stancavish, MA, and Lorraine Sweeney, BA, Embryon, LLC, a division of Advanced Health Media, LLC (formerly Medesta Publications Group, a business of Advogent), and Steven Cally, PhD, formerly of Advogent. This assistance was funded by Wyeth, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc, in October 2009.

All authors agree that this manuscript represents an accurate representation of the study results. Pfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth Research, had a role in the study design and the decision to submit the paper for publication.

References

  1. 1.
    Zanger UM, Raimundo S, Eichelbaum M. Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2004 Jan; 369(1): 23–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preskorn SH. Reproducibility of the in vivo effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on the in vivo function of cytochrome P450 2D6: an update (part I). J Psychiatr Pract 2003 Mar; 9(2): 150–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    deLeon J, Armstrong SC, Cozza KL. Clinical guidelines for psychiatrists for the use of pharmacogenetic testing for CYP450 2D6 and CYP450 2C19. Psychosomatics 2006 Jan; 47(1): 75–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mulder H, Herder A, Wilmink FW, et al. The impact of cytochrome P450-2D6 genotype on the use and interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring in long-stay patients treated with antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs in daily psychiatric practice. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006 Feb; 15(2): 107–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deecher DC, Beyer CE, Johnston G, et al. Desvenlafaxine succinate: a new serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006 Aug; 318(2): 657–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howell SR, Husbands GE, Scatina JA, et al. Metabolic disposition of 14C-venlafaxine in mouse, rat, dog, rhesus monkey and man. Xenobiotica 1993 Apr; 23(4): 349–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preskorn S, Patroneva A, Silman H, et al. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine extended release and desvenlafaxine in extensive and poor cytochrome P450 2D6 metabolizers. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2009 Feb; 29(1): 39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lessard E, Yessine MA, Hamelin BA, et al. Influence of CYP2D6 activity on the disposition and cardiovascular toxicity of the antidepressant agent venlafaxine in humans. Pharmacogenetics 1999 Aug; 9(4): 435–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lobello KW, Preskorn SH, Guico-Pabia CJ, et al. CYP2D6 phenotype predicts antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine. J Clin Psychiatry doi:10.4088/JCP.08m04773blu. EpubGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shams ME, Arneth B, Hiemke C, et al. CYP2D6 polymorphism and clinical effect of the antidepressant venlafaxine. J Clin Pharm Ther 2006 Oct; 31(5): 493–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wijnen PA, Limantoro I, Drent M, et al. Depressive effect of an antidepressant: therapeutic failure of venlafaxine in a case lacking CYP2D6 activity. Ann Clin Biochem 2009 Nov; 46 (Pt 6): 527–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pristiq [package insert]. Philadelphia (PA): Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2008Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nichols AI, Lobello K, Guico-Pabia CJ, et al. Venlafaxine metabolism as a marker of cytochrome P450 enzyme 2D6 metabolizer status. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2009 Aug; 29(4): 383–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daly AK. Pharmacogenetics of the cytochromes P450. Curr Top Med Chem 2004; 4(16): 1733–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sachse C, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences. Am J Hum Genet 1997 Feb; 60(2): 284–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clayton AH, Kornstein SG, Rosas G, et al. An integrated analysis of the safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine compared with placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder. CNS Spectr 2009; 14(4): 183–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirchheiner J, Nickchen K, Bauer M, et al. Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response. Mol Psychiatry 2004; 9(5): 442–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelly CM, Juurlink DN, Gomes T, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and breast cancer mortality in women receiving tamoxifen: a population based cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340: c693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goetz MP, Rae JM, Suman VJ, et al. Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes. J Clin Oncol 2005 Dec; 23(36): 9312–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiyotani K, Mushiroda T, Imamura CK, et al. Significant effect of polymorphisms in CYP2D6 and ABCC2 on clinical outcomes of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2010 Mar; 28(8): 1287–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schroth W, Goetz MP, Hamann U, et al. Association between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. JAMA 2009 Oct; 302(13): 1429–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuderer NM, Peppercorn J. CYP2D6 testing in breast cancer: ready for prime time? Oncology (Williston Park) 2009 Dec; 23(14): 1223–32Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rau T, Wohlleben G, Wuttke H, et al. CYP2D6 genotype: impact on adverse effects and nonresponse during treatment with antidepressants: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004 May; 75(5): 386–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bijl MJ, Visser LE, Hofman A, et al. Influence of the CYP2D6*4 polymorphism on dose, switching and discontinuation of antidepressants. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008 Apr; 65(4): 558–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mulder H, Wilmink FW, Beumer TL, et al. The association between cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype and prescription patterns of antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs in hospitalized psychiatric patients: a retrospective follow-up study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005 Apr; 25(2): 188–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zourkova A, Ceskova E, Hadasova E, et al. Links among paroxetine-induced sexual dysfunctions, gender, and CYP2D6 activity. J Sex Marital Ther 2007 Jul; 33(4): 343–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice I. Nichols
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kristen Focht
    • 1
  • Qin Jiang
    • 1
  • Sheldon H. Preskorn
    • 2
  • Cecelia P. Kane
    • 3
  1. 1.Senior Director, Clinical Pharmacology, Primary CarePfizer Inc, formerly Wyeth ResearchCollegevilleUSA
  2. 2.Clinical Research Institute and University of Kansas School of MedicineWichitaUSA
  3. 3.Formerly of Pfizer IncCollegevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations