Fauci AS. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008.
Google Scholar
King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(9): 1414–31.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 2010; 20; 303(3): 235–41.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1995; 44(8): 968–83.
Kahn R, Robertson RM, Smith R, et al. The impact of prevention on reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2008; 118(5): 576–85.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Fox CS, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Temporal trends in coronary heart disease mortality and sudden cardiac death from 1950 to 1999: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2004; 110(5): 522–7.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, et al. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 115(12): 1544–50.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(14): 977–86.
Article
Google Scholar
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 837–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(24): 2545–59.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(17): 1563–74.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive bloodpressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(17): 1575–85.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(24): 2560–72.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(2): 129–39.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(15): 1577–89.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kaul S, Bolger AF, Herrington D, et al. Thiazolidinedione drugs and cardiovascular risks: a science advisory from the American Heart Association and American College Of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(17): 1885–94.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Turner RC, Millns H, Neil HA, et al. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23). BMJ 1998; 316(7134): 823–8.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Mazzone T, Chait A, Plutzky J. Cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from mechanistic studies. Lancet 2008; 371(9626): 1800–9.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Costa J, Borges M, David C, et al. Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2006; 332(7550): 1115–24.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321(7258): 412–9.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ho JS, Cannaday JJ, Barlow CE, et al. Relation of the number of metabolic syndrome risk factors with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102(6): 689–92.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Gaede P, Vedel P, Parving HH, et al. Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study. Lancet 1999; 353(9153): 617–22.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nathan DM. Clinical practice. Initial management of glycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(17): 1342–9.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Vamecq J, Latruffe N. Medical significance of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptors. Lancet 1999; 354(9173): 141–8.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Chang F, Jaber LA, Berlie HD, et al. Evolution of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor agonists. Ann Pharmacother 2007; 41(6): 973–83.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
US FDA. Center for drug evaluation and research application number: 021071. 1999 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov [Accessed 2010 Jul 1].
Chappuis B, Braun M, Stettler C, et al. Differential effect of pioglitazone (PGZ) and rosiglitazone (RGZ) on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized crossover study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2007; 23(5): 392–9.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(24): 2457–71.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lincoff AM, Wolski K, Nicholls SJ, et al. Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2007; 298(10): 1180–8.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Juurlink DN, Gomes T, Lipscombe LL, et al. Adverse cardiovascular events during treatment with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone: population based cohort study. BMJ 2009; 339: b2942.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, et al. Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet 2009; 373(9681): 2125–35.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macrovascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366(9493): 1279–89.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Krey G, Braissant O, L’Horset F, et al. Fatty acids, eicosanoids, and hypolipidemic agents identified as ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11(6): 779–91.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Steiner G. Fibrates and coronary risk reduction. Atherosclerosis 2005; 182(2): 199–207.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987; 317(20): 1237–45.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341(6): 410–8.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, et al. Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366(9500): 1849–61.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Henry RR, Lincoff AM, Mudaliar S, et al. Effect of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha/gamma agonist aleglitazar on risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (SYNCHRONY): a phase II, randomised, dose-ranging study. Lancet 2009; 374(9684): 126–35.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bays H, McElhattan J, Bryzinski BS. A double-blind, randomised trial of tesaglitazar versus pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2007; 4(3): 181–93.
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Saad MF, Greco S, Osei K, et al. Ragaglitazar improves glycemic control and lipid profile in type 2 diabetic subjects: a 12-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled dose-ranging study with an open pioglitazone arm. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(6): 1324–9.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Long GG, Reynolds VL, Lopez-Martinez A, et al. Urothelial carcinogenesis in the urinary bladder of rats treated with naveglitazar, a γ-dominant PPAR α/γ agonist: lack of evidence for urolithiasis as an inciting event. Toxicol Pathol 2008; 36: 218–31.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buse JB, Rubin CJ, Frederich R, et al. Muraglitazar, a dual (alpha/gamma) PPAR activator: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week monotherapy trial in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther 2005; 27(8): 1181–95.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Nissen SE, Wolski K, Topol EJ. Effect of muraglitazar on death and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2005; 294(20): 2581–6.
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sanwald-Ducray P, Liogier D’ardhuy X, Jamois C, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. Epub 2010.