Skip to main content

Efficacy of Methylphenidate for Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

A Meta-Regression Analysis

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of methylphenidate for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) shows wide between-study variability, which yields heterogeneous results in meta-analysis. The reasons for this variability have not been comprehensively investigated.

Objectives: To determine the influence of treatment-related covariates of methylphenidate for adults with ADHD by means of meta-analysis. Clinical and methodological moderators and clinical trial reporting quality were also collected to control for their potential confounding effect.

Methods: We searched for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of methylphenidate for adults with ADHD. The study outcome was the efficacy of methylphenidate for reducing ADHD symptom severity. Treatment-related covariates included dose, type of drug-release formulation (formulations with a continuous drug release vs those with a non-continuous drug release), dose regimen (fixed vs flexible) and treatment length. Clinical (presence of co-morbid substance use disorders [SUD]) and methodological (design and rater) covariates were also collected, in addition to clinical trial reporting quality. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each study. The analysis of the influence of methylphenidate effect modifiers was performed by means of random-effects meta-regression.

Results: Eighteen studies were included. Dose, type of formulation and SUD appeared to modify the efficacy of methylphenidate in the bivariate analysis. These variables were included in a multivariate meta-regression, which showed that methylphenidate, at an average dose of 57.4 mg/day, delivered by means of non-continuous-release formulations, had a moderate effect on ADHD symptoms compared with placebo (SMD 0.57–0.58). A dose-response relationship was found, indicating that efficacy could be increased by SMD 0.11–0.12 for every 10 mg increment of methylphenidate. Continuous-release formulations and co-morbid SUD appeared to reduce the efficacy of methylphenidate. Nevertheless, the effect of treatment formulation may have been confounded by co-morbid SUD, since all studies using this continuous-release formulation were conducted in dual ADHD-SUD patients. No residual heterogeneity was found.

Conclusions: This study shows that methylphenidate improves ADHD symptoms in adults in a dose-dependent fashion. The efficacy of methylphenidate appears to be reduced in patients with co-morbid SUD. It is unclear whether methylphenidate efficacy is influenced by the type of formulation, because the effect of this covariate is confounded by that of co-morbid SUD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2
Table II
Fig. 3
Table III

References

  1. Wilens TE, Faraone SV, Biederman J. Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in adults. JAMA 2004; 292: 619–23

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, et al. The prevalence and effects of adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder on work performance in a nationally representative sample of workers. J Occup Environ Med 2005; 47: 565–72

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biederman J, Faraone SV, Spencer T, et al. Patterns of psychiatric comorbidity, cognition, and psychosocial functioning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 1792–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Biederman J, Monuteaux MC, Mick E, et al. Young adult outcome of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled 10-year follow-up study. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 167–79

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Young S, Toone B, Tyson C. Comorbidity and psychosocial profile in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Pers Individ Diff 2003; 35: 743–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barkley RA, Gordon M. Research on comorbidity, adaptive functioning, and cognitive impairments in adults with ADHD: implication for a clinical practice. In: Goldstein S, Ellison AT, editors. Clinician’s guide to adult ADHD: assessment and intervention. San Diego (CA): Academic Press, 2002: 43–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilens TE. Drug therapy for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Drugs 2003; 63: 2395–411

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pliszka S, AACAP Work Group on Quality Issues. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46: 894–921

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maidment ID. Efficacy of stimulants in adult ADHD. Ann Pharmacother 2003; 37: 1884–90

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson K, McDonagh MS, Fu R. Comparative benefits and harms of competing medications for adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and indirect comparison meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008; 197: 1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koesters M, Becker T, Kilian R, et al. Limits of meta-analysis: methylphenidate in the treatment of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Psychopharmacol 2008; 23: 733–44

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mészáros A, Czobor P, Bálint S, et al. Pharmacotherapy of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2009; 12: 1137–47

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Solanto MV. Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 1998; 94: 127–52

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Faraone SV, Spencer T, Aleardi M, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of methylphenidate for treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004; 24: 24–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Swanson J, Gupta S, Guinta D, et al. Acute tolerance to methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 295–305

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Swanson J. Compliance with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: issues and approaches for improvement. CNS Drugs 2003; 17: 117–31

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramos-Quiroga JA, Bosch R, Castells X, et al. Effect of switching drug formulations from immediate-release to extended-release OROS methylphenidate: a chart review of Spanish adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs 2008; 22: 603–11

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson J, Volkow N. Pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-dynamic properties of methylphenidate in humans. In: Solanto MV, Arnsten AFT, Castellanos FX, editors. Stimulant drugs and ADHD: basic and clinical neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2001: 259–82

    Google Scholar 

  19. Modi NB, Lindemulder B, Gupta SK. Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day osmotic controlled-release OROS (methylphenidate HCl) formulation. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 379–88

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyseng-Williamson KA, Keating GM. Extended-release methylphenidate (Ritalin LA). Drugs 2002; 62: 2251–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Biederman J, Spencer T, Wilens T. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 77–97

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Döpfner M, Gerber WD, Banaschewski T, et al. Comparative efficacy of once-a-day extended-release methylphenidate, two-times-daily immediate-release methylphenidate, and placebo in a laboratory school setting. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 13 Suppl. 1:I93–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen PS, Arnold LE, Swanson JM, et al. 3-Year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46: 989–1002

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kooij JJ, Burger H, Boonstra AM, et al. Efficacy and safety of methylphenidate in 45 adults with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over trial. Psychol Med 2004; 34: 973–82

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994; 309: 1351–5

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davey Smith G, Egger M, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: beyond the grand mean? BMJ 1997; 315: 1610–4

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Spencer TJ, et al. Comparing the efficacy of medications for ADHD using meta-analysis. Med Gen Med 2006; 8: 4

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of clinical trials. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta analysis in context. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001: 87–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wender PH. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ding YS, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, et al. Chiral drugs: comparison of the pharmacokinetics of [11C]d-threo and L-threo-methylphenidate in the human and baboon brain. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997; 131: 71–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ding YS, Gatley SJ, Thanos PK, et al. Brain kinetics of methylphenidate (Ritalin) enantiomers after oral administration. Synapse 2004; 53: 168–75

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Markowitz JS, Patrick KS. Differential pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methylphenidate enantiomers: does chirality matter? J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 28(3 Suppl. 2): S54–61

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.0 (updated February 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ [Accessed 2010 Jun 7]

  35. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3127–31

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, et al. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 140–9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Adler LA, Zimmerman B, Starr HL, et al. Efficacy and safety of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group, dose-escalation study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2009; 29: 239–47

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Biederman J, Mick E, Surman C, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59: 829–35

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bouffard R, Hechtman L, Minde K, et al. The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Can J Psychiatry 2003; 48: 546–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Carpentier PJ, de Jong CA, Dijkstra BA, et al. A controlled trial of methylphenidate in adults with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorders. Addiction 2005; 100: 1868–74

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gualtieri CT, Ondrusek MG, Finley C. Attention deficit disorders in adults. Clin Neuropharmacol 1985; 8: 343–56

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jain U, Hechtman L, Weiss M, et al. Efficacy of a novel biphasic controlled-release methylphenidate formula in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68: 268–77

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuperman S, Perry PJ, Gaffney GR, et al. Bupropion SR vs methylphenidate vs placebo for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2001; 13: 129–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Levin FR, Evans SM, Brooks DJ, et al. Treatment of methadone-maintained patients with adult ADHD: double-blind comparison of methylphenidate, bupropion and placebo. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 81: 137–48

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Levin FR, Evans SM, Brooks DJ, et al. Treatment of cocaine dependent treatment seekers with adult ADHD: double-blind comparison of methylphenidate and placebo. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 87: 20–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mattes JA, Boswell L, Oliver H. Methylphenidate effects on symptoms of attention deficit disorder in adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41: 1059–63

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Medori R, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Casas M, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of three fixed dosages of prolonged-release OROS methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63: 981–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reimherr FW, Williams ED, Strong RE, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of osmotic release oral system methylphenidate in adults with ADHD with assessment of oppositional and emotional dimensions of the disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68: 93–101

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rösler M, Fischer R, Ammer R, et al. A randomised, placebo-controlled, 24-week, study of low-dose extended-release methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009; 259: 120–9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schubiner H, Saules KK, Arfken CL, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of methylphenidate in the treatment of adult ADHD patients with comorbid cocaine dependence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2002; 10: 286–94

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Spencer T, Wilens T, Biederman J, et al. A double-blind, crossover comparison of methylphenidate and placebo in adults with childhood-onset attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52: 434–43

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, et al. A large, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of methylphenidate in the treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57: 456–63

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Spencer TJ, Adler LA, McGough JJ, et al., Adult ADHD Research Group. Efficacy and safety of dexmethylphenidate extended-release capsules in adults with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61: 1380–7

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tenenbaum S, Paull JC, Sparrow EP, et al. An experimental comparison of Pycnogenol and methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). J Atten Disord 2002; 6: 49–60

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wender PH, Reimherr FW, Wood D, et al. A controlled study of methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, residual type, in adults. Am J Psychiatry 1985; 142: 547–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Weiss MD, Gadow K, Wasdell MB. Effectiveness outcomes in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67 Suppl. 8: 38–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mariani JJ, Levin FR. Treatment strategies for co-occurring ADHD and substance use disorders. Am J Addict 2007; 16 Suppl. 1: 45–54

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. González MA, Pentikis HS, Anderl N, et al. Methylphenidate bioavailability from two extended-release formulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002 Apr; 40(4): 175–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Markowitz JS, Straughn AB, Patrick KS, et al. Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42(4): 393–401

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Reiz JL, Donnelly GA, Michalko K. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose methylphenidate from a multilayer-release bead formulation and an osmotic system: a two-way crossover study in healthy young adults. Clin Ther 2008; 30: 59–69

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by grants from the Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya, the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya for Research groups of the Generalitat de Catalunya 2009–2013 SGR 1554 and by la Obra Social “la Caixa” and the Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya Programa “PAI-TLP-La Caixa 2009” and “PAI-TLP-La Caixa 2010”.

Dr Xavier Castells, Dr Rosa Bosch and Dr Mariana Nogueira have received lecture fees for participating in conferences organized by Janssen-Cilag. Dr Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga and Dr Miguel Casas have received lecture fees for participating in conferences organized by Janssen-Cilag, Laboratios Rubió and Lilly, and consulting fees from Janssen-Cilag. Dr David Rigau and Dr Xavier Vidal report no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Castells.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castells, X., Ramos-Quiroga, J.A., Rigau, D. et al. Efficacy of Methylphenidate for Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. CNS Drugs 25, 157–169 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11539440-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11539440-000000000-00000

Keywords

  • Methylphenidate
  • ADHD Symptom
  • Standardize Mean Difference
  • Treatment Length
  • Adult ADHD