Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Game, Set and Match? Substantive Issues and Future Directions in Performance Analysis

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the main substantive issues surrounding performance analysis and considers future directions in this recently formed sub-discipline of sport science. It is argued that it is insufficient to bring together sport biomechanics and notational analysis on the basis that they share a number of commonalities, such as they both aim to enhance performance, they both make extensive use of information and communications technology, and both are concerned with producing valid and reliable data. Rather, it is suggested that the common factor linking sport biomechanics and notational analysis is that they can both be used to measure and describe the same phenomenon (i.e. emergent pattern formation) at different scales of analysis (e.g. intra-limb, inter-limb and torso, and inter-personal). Key concepts from dynamical system theory, such as self-organization and constraints, can then be used to explain stability, variability and transitions among coordinative states. By adopting a constraints-based approach, performance analysis could be effectively opened up to sport scientists from other sub-disciplines of sport science, such as sport physiology and psychology, rather than solely being the preserve of sport biomechanists and notational analysts. To conclude, consideration is given to how a more unified approach, based on the tenets of dynamical systems theory, could impact on the future of performance analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes M, Bartlett R. What is performance analysis? In: Hughes M, Franks IM, editors. The essentials of performance analysis: an introduction. London: Routledge, 2008: 8–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett R. Performance analysis: can bringing together biomechanics and notational analysis benefit coaches? Int J Perform Anal Sport 2001; 1: 122–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett R. Performance analysis: is it the bringing together of biomechanics and notational analysis or an illusion? In: Blackwell JR, editor. Proceedings of oral sessions: XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2001 Jun 20-26; San Francisco (CA). San Francisco (CA): University of San Francisco, 2001: 328–31

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glazier PS, Davids K, Bartlett RM. Dynamical systems theory: a relevant framework for performance-orientedsports biomechanics research. Sportscience 7 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sportsci.org/jour/03/psg.htm [Accessed 2009 Sep 1]

  5. Glazier PS, Wheat JS, Pease DL, et al. The interface of biomechanics and motor control: dynamic systems theoryand the functional role ofmovement variability. In: Davids K, Bennett SJ, Newell KM, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2006: 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gréhaigne J-F, Bouthier D, David B. Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 137–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McGarry T, Anderson DI, Wallace SA, et al. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 771–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes MD. Performance analysis — a 2004 perspective. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2004; 4: 103–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes MD, Bartlett RM. Performance analysis. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 735–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes MD, Bartlett RM. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 739–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coyle EF. Physiological determinants of endurance exercise performance. J Sci Med Sport 1999; 2: 181–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bassett DR, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 70–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Landers DM, Arent SM. Arousal-performance relationships. In: Williams JM, editor. Applied sport psychology:personal growth to peak performance. 4th ed. MountainView (CA): Mayfield, 2001: 206–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arent SM, Landers DM. Arousal, anxiety, and performance: a re-examination of the inverted-U hypothesis. ResQ Exerc Sport 2003; 74: 436–44

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lees A. Technique analysis in sports: a critical review. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 813–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morriss C, Bartlett R. Biomechanical factors critical for the performance in the men’s javelin throw. Sports Med 1996; 21: 438–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hay JG, Reid JG. Anatomy, mechanics, and human motion. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986: 341–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 2000; 135: 382–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGarry T. Applied and theoretical perspectives of performance analysis in sport: scientific issues and challenges. IntJ Perform Anal Sport 2009; 9: 128–40

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davids K, Lees A, Burwitz L. Understanding and measuring coordination and control in kicking skills in soccer implications for talent identification and skill acquisition. J Sports Sci 2000; 18: 703–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Newell KM. On task and theory specificity. J Mot Behav 1989; 21: 92–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Newell KM, Morrison S. Frames of reference and normal movement. Behav Brain Sci 1996; 19: 83–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Newell KM. Change in movement and skill: learning, retention, and transfer. In: Latash ML, Turvey MT, editors. Dexterity and its development. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum, 1996: 393–429

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winter DA. Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects. Hum Mov Sci 1984; 3: 51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sparrow WA. Measuring changes in coordination and control. In: Summers JJ, editor. Approaches to the study of motor control and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992: 147–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Hatze H. The extended transentropy function as a useful quantifier of human motion variability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 751–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sidaway B, Heise G, Schoenfelder-Zohdi B. Quantifying the variability of angle-angle plots. J Hum Mov Stud 1995; 29: 181–97

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mullineaux DR, Bartlett RM, Bennett SJ. Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 739–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wheat JS, Glazier PS. Measuring coordination and variability in coordination. In: Davids K, Bennett SJ, Newell KM, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2006: 167–81

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baumann W. Biomechanics of sports — current problems. In: Bergmann G, Kolbel R, Rohlmann A, editors. Biomechanics: basic and applied research. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987: 51–8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Norman RW. A barrier to understanding human motion mechanisms: a commentary. In: Skinner JS, Corbin CB, Landers DM, et al., editors. Future directions in exercise and sport science research. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1989: 151–61

    Google Scholar 

  33. Winter DA. Future directions in biomechanics research of human movement. In: Skinner JS, Corbin CB, Landers DM,et al., editors. Future directions in exercise and sport science research. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1989: 201–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hatze H. Biomechanics of sports: selected examples of successful applications and future perspectives. In: Riehle HJ, Vieten MM, editors. Proceedings of the XVIth International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1998 Jul 21-25. Konstanz: University of Konstanz, 1998: 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hay JG, Vaughan CL, Woodworth GG. Technique and performance: identifying the limiting factors. In: Morecki A, Fidelus K, Wit A, editors. Biomechanics VII-B. Baltimore (MD): University Park Press, 1981: 511–20

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zatsiorsky VM. Kinetics of human motion. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Ingen Schenau GJ. From rotation to translation: constraints on multi-joint movements and the unique action of bi-articular muscles. Hum Mov Sci 1989; 8: 301–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sparrow WA, Sherman C. Visual expertise in the perception of action. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2001; 29: 124–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Haken H, Wunderlin A. Synergetics and its paradigm of self organization in biological systems. In: Whiting HTA, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PCW, editors. The natural physical approach to movement control. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1990: 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  40. McGarry T, Franks IM. System approach to games and competitive playing: reply to Lebed (2006). Eur J Sport Sci 2007; 7: 47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weinburg RS. Anxiety and motor performance: where to from here? Anxiety Res 1990; 2: 227–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodacki ALF, Fowler NE, Bennett SJ. Multi-segment coordination: fatigue effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1157–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kugler PN, Turvey MT. Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thelen E, Smith LB. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wallace SA. Dynamic pattern perspective of rhythmic movement: an introduction. In: Zelaznik HN, editor. Advancesin motor learning and control. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996: 155–94

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kugler PN. A morphological perspective on the origin and evolution of movement patterns. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986: 459–525

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Kaufmann SA. The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  48. Clark JE. On becoming skillful: patterns and constraints. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995; 66: 173–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kelso JAS, Schöner G. Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Hum Mov Sci 1988; 7: 27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beek PJ, Peper CE, Stegeman DF. Dynamical models of movement coordination. Hum Mov Sci 1995; 14: 573–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kelso JAS. Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kay B. The dimensionality of movement trajectories and the degrees of freedom problem: a tutorial. Hum Mov Sci 1988; 7: 343–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; 30: 26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kelso JAS, Schöner G, Scholz JP, et al. Nonequilibrium phase transitions in coordinated movements involving many degrees of freedom. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1987; 504: 293–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schöner G, Kelso JAS. A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination: I. Relative phase dynamics. Biol Cyber 1988; 58: 71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Haken H. Synergetics: an introduction. Non-equilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry and biology. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  57. Michaels C, Beek P. The state of ecological psychology. Ecol Psych 1995; 7: 259–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Summers JJ. Has ecological psychology delivered what it promised? In: Summers JJ, editor. Motor behavior and human skill: a multidisciplinary approach. Champaign(IL): Human Kinetics, 1998: 385–402

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kelso JAS. Phase transitions and critical behaviour in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1984; 246: R1000–4

    Google Scholar 

  60. Haken H, Kelso JAS, Bunz H. A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cyber 1985; 51: 347–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kelso JAS, Buchanan JJ, Wallace SA. Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns. Exp Brain Res 1991; 85: 432–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kelso JAS, Jeka JJ. Symmetry breaking dynamics of human multilimb coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Perc Perform 1992; 18: 645–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Schmidt RC, Carello C, Turvey MT. Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J Exp Psychol Hum Perc Perform 1990; 16: 227–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Schmidt RC, O’Brien B, Sysko R. Self-organization of between-persons cooperative tasks and possible applications to sport. Int J Sport Psychol 1999; 30: 558–79

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hopkins W. Sport performance at the Oslo Conference of the European College of Sport Science. Sportscience 2009; 13: 28–32 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sportsci.org/2009/wghECSS.htm [Accessed 2009 Sep 1]

    Google Scholar 

  66. Araújo D, Davids K, Bennett SJ, et al. Emergence of sport skills under constraints. In: Williams AM, Hodges NJ, editors. Skill acquisition in sport research, theory andpractice. London: Routledge, 2004: 409–33

    Google Scholar 

  67. Davids K, Button C, Bennett S. Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach. Champaign (IL): HumanKinetics, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  68. Davids K, Araújo D, Shuttleworth R, et al. Acquiring skill in sport: a constraints-led perspective. Int J Comp Sci Sport 2003; 2: 31–9

    Google Scholar 

  69. Handford C, Davids K, Bennett S, et al. Skill acquisition in sport: some applications of an evolving practice ecology. J Sport Sci 1997; 15: 621–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Interpersonal dynamics in sport: the role of artificial neural networks and 3-Danalysis. Behav Res Meth 2006; 38: 683–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Barris S, Button C. A review of vision-based motion analysis in sport. Sports Med 2008; 38: 1025–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Seifert L, Chollet D, Rouard A. Swimming constraints and arm coordination. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26: 68–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Davids K, Bennett S, Handford C, et al. Acquiring coordination in self-paced extrinsic timing tasks: a constraints led perspective. Int J Sport Psychol 1999; 30: 437–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. The author has no conflict of interest that is directly relevant to the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Campus, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK

    Paul S. Glazier

Authors
  1. Paul S. Glazier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul S. Glazier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazier, P.S. Game, Set and Match? Substantive Issues and Future Directions in Performance Analysis. Sports Med 40, 625–634 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11534970-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11534970-000000000-00000

Keywords

Search

Navigation