Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacotherapy Options for Locally Advanced and Advanced Cervical Cancer

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutic modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be investigated. A recent, randomized, phase III trial has shown for the first time that combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine concurrently with radiation improves parameters of survival over cisplatin alone and establishes a new standard for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. On the other hand, advanced disease, presenting either as an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB or as persistent or recurrent to primary therapy without local curative options, remains a devastating group of diseases with no options other than palliative chemotherapy. Recent results from the GOG (Gynecologic and Oncologic Group)-204 study demonstrate that cisplatin-doublets with paclitaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine or topotecan only produce small improvements in survival, although with different toxicity patterns; hence, patient-related factors are important when choosing any one of these regimens. The role of targeted therapies both in locally advanced and advanced disease is promising, but still at an investigational stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001; 94: 153–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 535–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stheman FB, Ali S, Keys HM, et al. Radiation therapy with or without weekly cisplatin for bulky stage 1B cervical carcinoma: follow-up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 503.e1-6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gadducci A, Sartori E, Maggino T, et al. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003; 24: 513–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greer BE, Figge DC, Tamimi HK, et al. Stage IA2 squamous carcinoma of the cervix: difficult diagnosis and therapeutic dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1406–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Plante M, Renaud MC, Hoskins IA, et al. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: a valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer - a series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 98: 3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maneo A, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 438–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu H, Peng ZL, Lou JY, et al. Pregnancy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical trachelectomy in bulky stage IB1 cervical cancer: a case report. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48: 517–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robova H, Pluta M, Hrehorcak M, et al. High-dose density chemotherapy followed by simple trachelectomy: full-term pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 1367–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Plante M, Lau S, Brydon L, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy in bulky stage IB1 cervical cancer: case report. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 367–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barranger E, Cortéz A, Grahek D, et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node procedure for cervical cancer: impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11: 445–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Annual report on the results of treatment in gynaecological cancer. J Epidemiol Statist 1998; 3: 5–34

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brunschwig A, Daniel W. Evaluation of pelvic exenteration for advanced cancer of the cervix. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1956; 103: 337–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement on cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 351–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peters 3rd WA, Liu PY, Barrett R, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1606–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, et al. A randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydro-xyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stages IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1339–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and paraaortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1137–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1154–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cis-platin-based chemoradiation improves progression-free survival in advanced cervical cancer: results of a randomized Gynecologic Oncology Group study. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1144–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2001; 358: 781–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Green J, Kirwan J, Tierney J, et al. Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (3): CD002225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Symonds RP, Collingwood M, Kirwan J, et al. Concomitant hydroxyurea plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2004; 30: 405–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas G, Dembo A, Ackerman I, et al. A randomized trial of standard versus partially hyperfractionated radiation with or without concurrent 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 69: 137–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieland HS, et al. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 502–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanciano R, Calkins A, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 8289–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abu-Rustum NR, Lee S, Correa A, et al. Compliance with and acute hematologic toxic effects of chemoradiation in indigent women with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 81: 88–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Serkies K, Jassem J. Concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy in routine management of cervical cancer: a report on patient compliance and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60: 814–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cetina L, Rivera L, Hinojosa J, et al. Routine management of locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent radiation and cisplatin: five-year results. BMC Womens Health 2006; 6: 3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaake-Koning C, van den Bogaert W, Dalesio O, et al. Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 524–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mitsuhashi A, Uno T, Tanaka N, et al. Phase I study of daily cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 194–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang LX, Douple EB, O’Hara JA, et al. Production of DNA double-strand breaks by interactions between car-boplatin and radiation: a potential mechanism for radio-potentiation. Radiat Res 1995; 143: 309–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Knox RJ, Friedlos F, Lydall DA, et al. Mechanism of cytotoxicity of anticancer platinum drugs: evidence that cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (II) and cis-diammine-(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato) platinum (II) differ only in the kinetics of their interaction with DNA. Cancer Res 1986; 46: 1972–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanaka T, Yukawa K, Umesaki N. Radiation reduces carboplatin sensitivity and enhances nedaplatin sensitivity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2007; 28: 352–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lokich J, Anderson N. Carboplatin versus cisplatin in solid tumors: an analysis of the literature. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 13–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Douple EB, Richmond RC, O’Hara JA, et al. Carboplatin as a potentiator of radiation therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 1985; 12: 111–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hopkins MP, Morley GW. Prognostic factors in advanced stage squamous cell cancer of the cervix. Cancer 1993; 72: 2389–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Klahr S, Morrison A, Buerkert J. Effects of urinary tract obstruction on renal function. Contrib Nephrol 1980; 23: 34–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan SB, Wu HW, Luo JA, et al. Assessment of renal function in the early stages of nephrotoxicity induced by iodinated contrast media. Nephron 1999; 83: 122–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Micheletti E, La Face B, Bianchi E, et al. Continuous infusion of carboplatin during conventional radiotherapy treatment in advanced squamous carcinoma of the cervix uteri IIB-IIIB (UICC): a phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study. Am J Clin Oncol 1997; 20: 613–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Muderspach LI, Curtin JP, Roman LD, et al. Carboplatin as a radiation sensitizer in locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 65: 336–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dueñas-González A, Cetina L, Sánchez B, et al. A phase I study of carboplatin concurrent with radiation in FIGO stage IIIB cervix uteri carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 1361–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cetina L, Garcýa-Árias A, Uribe MJ, et al. Concurrent chemoradiation with carboplatin for elderly, diabetic and hypertensive patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008; 29: 608–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss RB, Christian MC. New cisplatin analogues in development: a review. Drugs 1993; 46: 360–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Monk BJ, Alberts DS, Burger RA, et al. In vitro phase II comparison of the cytotoxicity of a novel platinum analog, nedaplatin (254-S), with that of cisplatin and carboplatin against fresh, human cervical cancers. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71: 308–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Niibe Y, Tsunoda S, Jobo T, et al. Phase II study of radiation therapy combined with weekly nedaplatin in locally advanced uterine cervical carcinoma (LAUCC): Kitasato Gynecologic Radiation Oncology Group (KGROG 0501) - initial analysis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008; 29: 222–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yokoyama Y, Takano T, Nakahara K, et al. A phase II multicenter trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin in advanced uterine cervical carcinoma: Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study. Oncol Rep 2008; 19: 1551–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kodama J, Takemoto M, Seki N, et al. Phase I study of weekly nedaplatin and concurrent pelvic radiotherapy as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery for cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 1037–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cividalli A, Ceciarelli F, Livdi E, et al. Radiosensitization by oxaliplatin in a mouse adenocarcinoma: influence of treatment schedule. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 1092–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kjellstrom J, Kjellen E, Johnsson A. In vitro radiosensitization by oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in a human colon cancer cell line. Acta Oncol 2005; 44: 687–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Danson S, Ward TH, Butler J, et al. DT-diaphorase: a target for new anticancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rev 2004; 30: 437–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Siegel D, Gibson NW, Preusch PC, et al. Metabolism of mitomycin C by DT-diaphorase: role in mitomycin C-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity in human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 7483–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Flam M, John M, Pajak TF, et al. Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2527–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Evans LS, Kersh CR, Constable WC, et al. Concomitant 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C, and radiotherapy for advanced gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15: 901–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ludgate SM, Crandon AJ, Hudson CN, et al. Synchronous 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C and radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 15: 893–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Thomas G, Dembo A, Beale F, et al. Concurrent radiation, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil in poor prognosis carcinoma of cervix: preliminary results of a phase I-II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10: 1785–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lorvidhaya V, Chitapanarux I, Sangruchi S, et al. Concurrent mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 1226–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chirstophidis N, Vajda FJ, Lucas I, et al. Fluorouracil therapy in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a pharmacokinetic comparison of various rates and routes of administration. Clin Pharmacokinet 1978; 3: 330–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Roberts KB, Urdaneta N, Vera R, et al. Interim results of a randomized trial of mitomycin C as an adjunct to radical radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Cancer 2000; 90: 206–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Christie DR, Bull CA, Gebski V, et al. Concurrent 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and irradiation in locally advanced cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 1995; 37: 181–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rakovitch E, Fyles AW, Pintilie M, et al. Role of mitomycin C in the development of late bowel toxicity following chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 979–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wong LC, Choy DT, Ngan HY, et al. 4-Epidoxorubicin in recurrent cervical cancer. Cancer 1989; 63: 1279–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Calero F, Rodrýguez-Escudero F, Jimeno J, et al. Single agent epirubicin in squamous cell cervical cancer: a phase II trial. Acta Oncol 1991; 30: 325–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jagetia GC, Nayak V. Effect of doxorubicin on cell survival and micronuclei formation in HeLa cells exposed to different doses of gamma-radiation. Strahlenther Onkol 2000; 176: 422–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ban J, Bistrovic M, Maricic Z, et al. Combined treatment of 40-epi-doxorubicin and radiation on hamster lung cells. Tumori 1986; 72: 339–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wong LC, Ngan HY, Cheung AN, et al. Chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2055–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Garcýa-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 641–61

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chen AY, Choy H, Rothenberg ML. DNA topoisomerase I-targeting drugs as radiation sensitizers. Oncology 1999; 13: 39–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Perego P, Capranico G, Supino R, et al. Topoisomerase I gene expression and cell sensitivity to camptothecin in human cell lines of different tumor types. Anticancer Drugs 1994; 5: 645–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen BM, Chen JY, Kao M, et al. Elevated topoisomerase I activity in cervical cancer as a target for chemoradiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79: 272–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Dunton CJ, King SA, Neufeld J, et al. Phase I study of topotecan and radiation therapy in advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 85: 185–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Bell MC, Davidson SA, Mathis JM, et al. Topotecan concomitant with primary brachytherapy radiation in patients with cervical carcinoma: a phase I trial. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 128–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Gatcliffe TA, Tewari KS, Shah A, et al. A feasibility study of topotecan with standard-dose cisplatin and concurrent primary radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112: 85–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Lhomme C, Fumoleau P, Fargeot P, et al. Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3136–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Muggia FM, Blessing JA, McGehee R, et al. Cisplatin and irinotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94: 483–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Tanaka T, Yukawa K, Umesaki N. Combination effects of irradiation and irinotecan on cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro. Oncol Rep 2005; 14: 1365–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Suntornpong N, Pattaranutaporn P, Chanslip Y, et al. Concurrent radiation therapy and irinotecan in stage IIIB cervical cancer. J Med Assoc Thai 2003; 86: 430–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Edelstein MP, Wolfe 3rd LA, Duch DS. Potentiation of radiation therapy by vinorelbine (Navelbine) in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 1996; 23: 41–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Fukuoka K, Arioka H, Iwamoto Y, et al. Mechanism of the radiosensitization induced by vinorelbine in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 2001; 34: 451–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Fukuoka K, Arioka H, Iwamoto Y, et al. Mechanism of vinorelbine-induced radiosensitization of human small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2002; 49: 385–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Mundt AJ, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, et al. Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82: 333–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Rave-Frank M, Meden H, Jaschke A, et al. The effect of paclitaxel on the radiosensitivity of gynecological tumor cells. Strahlenther Onkol 1997; 173: 281–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Rodrýguez M, Sevin BU, Perras J, et al. Paclitaxel: a radiation sensitizer of human cervical cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 57: 165–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Erlich E, McCall AR, Potkul RK, et al. Paclitaxel is only a weak radiosensitizer of human cervical carcinoma cell lines. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 60: 251–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Hennequin C, Giocanti N, Favaudon V. Interaction of ionizing radiation with paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in HeLa and SQ20B cells. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 1842–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Cerrotta A, Gardan G, Cavina R, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy and weekly paclitaxel for locally advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a pilot study with intensification of dose. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002; 23: 115–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen MD, Paley PJ, Potish RA, et al. Phase I trial of taxol as a radiation sensitizer with cisplatin in advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 67: 131–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Prasad E, Viswanathan PN, Rangad VF, et al. Maximum tolerated dose and early response-results of a phase I trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin with radiation therapy in carcinoma of the cervix. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21: 488–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. DiSilvestro PA, Walker JL, Morrison A, et al., Gynecologic Oncology Group. Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: a phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103: 1038–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Pignata S, Frezza P, Tramontana S, et al. Phase I study with weekly cisplatin-paclitaxel and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 455–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Higgins R, Bussey M, Nauman W, et al. Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 205.e1-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Lee MY, Wu HG, Kim K, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy as a definitive treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104: 95–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Rao GG, Rogers P, Drake RD, et al. Phase I clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel, weekly carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy for primary cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96: 168–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, et al. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 1274–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F, Fukase Y, et al. Positive correlation between the efficacy of capecitabine and doxifluridine and the ratio of thymidine phosphorylase to dihydropyr-imidine dehydrogenase activities in tumors in human cancer xenografts. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 685–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Ueda M, Terai Y, Kumaga K, et al. Correlation between thymidine phosphorylase expression and invasion phenotype in cervical carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 2001; 91: 778–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F. X ray irradiation induces thymidine phosphorylase and enhances the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2948–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Torrecillas L, Ballesteros G, Cervantes P. Capecitabine chemoradiation for stage IIb-IIIb cervical cancer: preliminary phase I results of the Mexican Oncology Group [abstract]. Proc ECCO 2003; 12: 163

    Google Scholar 

  98. Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Mavroudis D, et al. Multi-center dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 1284–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Ngan SY, Michael M, Mackay J, et al. A phase I trial of preoperative radiotherapy and capecitabine for locally advanced, potentially resectable rectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 1019–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, et al. Oral capecitabine versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 1190–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Stokes Z, Symonds P, Habeshaw T, et al. Phase one dose finding study of capecitabine (Xeloda), radiotherapy and cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97: 790–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Domingo E, Lorvidhaya V, de Los Reyes R, et al. Capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant capecitabine for locally advanced squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: phase II results. Oncologist 2009; 14: 828–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Pauwels B, Korst AE, Lardon F, et al. Combined modality therapy of gemcitabine and radiation. Oncologist 2005; 10: 34–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Lawrence TS, Eisbruch A, Shewach DS. Gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization. Semin Oncol 1997; 24: 24–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Hernández P, Olivera P, Dueñas-González A, et al. Gemcitabine activity in cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Che-mother Pharmacol 2001; 48: 488–92

    Google Scholar 

  106. Mose S, Karapetian M, Juling-Pohlit L. The intensification of the radiotherapeutic effect on HeLa cells by gemcitabine. Strahlenther Onkol 1999; 175: 78–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Dueñas-González A, González EA, López-Graniel C, et al. A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as induction chemotherapy for untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 541–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Dueñas-González A, López-Graniel C, Gonzàlez AE, et al. Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2003; 26: 22–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. McCormack M, Thomas H. A phase Ib study of gemcitabine (GEM) and concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in carcinoma of the cervix. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 88–9

    Google Scholar 

  110. Pattaranutaporn P, Thirapakawong C, Chansilpa Y, et al. Phase II study of concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in locally advanced stage IIIB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 81: 404–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Boualga K. A phase II study of gemcitabine (G) and concomitant radiotherapy (R) in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix (LACC) [abstract]. Int J Cancer 2002; 13: 378

    Google Scholar 

  112. Cetina L, Rivera L, Candelaria M, et al. Chemoradiation with gemcitabine for cervical cancer in patients with renal failure. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 761–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Álvarez AM, Mickiewicz E, Roth B, et al. Feasibility of accelerated radiotherapy (Rt) concurrent with low dose biweekly gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2001; 20: 100a

    Google Scholar 

  114. Álvarez AM, Mickiewicz E, Rodger J, et al. Radiotherapy (RT) with low dose biweekly gemcitabine (LDBG) and cisplatin in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC): stages IIA-IVA [abstract]. Proc ASCO 2002; 21: 224a

    Google Scholar 

  115. Zarba JJ, Jaremtchuk AV, González Jazey P, et al. A phase I-II study of weekly cisplatin and gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1285–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Candelaria M, Chanona-Vilchis J, Cetina L, et al. Prognostic significance of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006; 3: 3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Dueñas-González A, Cetina-Pérez L, López-Graniel C, et al. Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: a randomized phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 817–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Umanzor J, Aguiluz M, Pineda C, et al. Concurrent cis-platin/gemcitabine chemotherapy along with radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100: 70–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Dueñas-González A, Zarba JJ, Alcedo JC, et al. A phase III study comparing concurrent gemcitabine (Gem) plus cisplatin (Cis) and radiation followed by adjuvant Gem plus Cis versus concurrent Cis and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix [abstract no. CRA5507]. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (18S Suppl.)

  120. Swisher EM, Swensen RE, Greer B, et al. Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with pelvic radiation in the primary therapy of cervical cancer: a phase I trial of the Puget Sound Oncology Consortium. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101: 429–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Rose PG, Degeest K, McMeekin S, et al. A phase I study of gemcitabine followed by cisplatin concurrent with whole pelvic radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 274–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5802–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Radiotherapy with single-agent cisplatin or combination chemotherapy in defined poor-prognostic cervical cancer [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00842660]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00842660 [Accessed 2010 Jan 27]

  124. Institut Curie. Radiation therapy and cisplatin with or without cetuximab in treating patients with stage IB, stage II, or stage IIIB cervical cancer [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00957411]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00957411 [Accessed 2010 Jan 27]

  125. Hoffmann W, Blase MA, Santo-Hoeltje L, et al. Radiation sensitivity of human squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro is modulated by all-trans and 13-cis-retinoic acid in combination with interferon-alpha. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 45: 991–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Moore DM, Kalvakolanu DV, Lippman SM, et al. Retinoic acid and interferon in human cancer: mechanistic and clinical studies. Semin Hematol 1994; 31: 31–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Lippman SM, Kavanagh JJ, Paredes-Espinoza M, et al. 13-Cis-retinoic acid plus interferon alpha-2a: highly active systemic therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 241–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Weiss GR, Liu PY, Alberts DS, et al. 13-Cis-retinoic acid or all-trans-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha in recurrent cervical cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71: 386–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Hallum 3rd AV, Alberts DS, Lippman SM, et al. Phase II study of 13-cis-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha 2a in heavily pretreated squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 56: 382–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Park TK, Lee JP, Kim SN, et al. Interferon-alpha 2a, 13-cis-retinoic acid and radiotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a pilot study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1998; 19: 35–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Yazigi R, Aliste G, Torres R, et al. Phase III randomized pilot study comparing interferon alpha-2b in combination with radiation therapy versus radiation therapy alone in patients with stage III-B carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13: 164–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 567–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Nogueira-Rodrigues A, do Carmo CC, Viegas C, et al. Phase I trial of erlotinib combined with cisplatin and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 6324–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2470–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Eddy GL. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery in cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1996; 21: 93–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Zanetta G, Lissoni A, Pellegrino A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel for locally advanced squamous-cell cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9: 977–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Dueñas-González A, López-Graniel C, González-Enciso A, et al. A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1278–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Kumagai S, et al. Combination therapy with irinotecan and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 95–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Pignata S, Silvestro G, Ferrari E, et al. Phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 756–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, et al. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4137–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Fossati R, Buda A, Rulli E, et al. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma (LASCCC). Comparison of paclitaxel, cisplatin (TP), versus paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin (TIP): the SNAP-02 Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (16S Pt I): 5026

    Google Scholar 

  142. Dueñas-González A, López-Graniel C, González-Enciso A, et al. Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1212–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Dueñas-González A, López-Graniel CM, Mota A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2908–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Bonomi P, Blessing JA, Stehman FB, et al. Randomized trial of three cisplatin dose schedules in squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 1079–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Thigpen JT, Blessing JA, DiSaia PJ, et al. A randomized comparison of rapid versus prolonged (24 hr) infusion of cisplatin in therapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 32: 198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Omura GA, Blessing JA, Vaccarello L, et al. A randomized trial of cisplatin versus cisplatin plus mitolactol versus cisplatin plus ifosfamide in advanced squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 165–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Bloss JD, Blessing JA, Behrens BC, et al. Randomized trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without bleomycin in squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 1832–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Rose PG, Blessing JA, Gershenson DM, et al. Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2676–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Fiorica J, Holloway R, Ndubisi B, et al. Phase II trial of topotecan and cisplatin in persistent or recurrent squamous and nonsquamous carcinomas of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 85: 89–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Morris M, Blessing JA, Monk BJ, et al. Phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 3340–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Brewer CA, Blessing JA, Nagourney RA, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine in previously treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100: 385–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 3113–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Long HJ, Bundy BN, Grendys EC, et al. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4626–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4649–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Mountzios G, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1362–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Sit AS, Kelley JL, Gallion HH, et al. Paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent or persistent cancer of the cervix. Cancer Invest 2004; 22: 368–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Tinker AV, Bhagat K, Swenerton KD, Hoskins PJ. Carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma: the British Columbia Cancer Agency experience. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 98: 54–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Papaxoinis G, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 777–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Gynecologic Oncology Group. Paclitaxel and cisplatin or topotecan with or without bevacizumab in treating patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00803062]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00803062 [Accessed 2010 Jan 27]

  161. Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Trial of TP versus TC regimens for stage IVb, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer (JCOG0505, CC-TPTC-P3) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00295789]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00295789 [Accessed 2010 Jan 27]

  162. Moore KN, Herzog TJ, Lewin S, et al. A comparison of cisplatin/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105: 299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Kersemaekers AMF, Fleuren GJ, Kenter GG, et al. Oncogene alterations in carcinomas of the uterine cervix: overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 577–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. Goncalves A, Fabbro M, Lhommé C, et al. A phase II trial to evaluate gefitinib as second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurring locoregionally advanced or metastatic cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108: 42–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. Schilder RJ, Sill MW, Lee YC, et al. A phase II trial of erlotinib in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 929–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Taja-Chayeb L, Chávez-Blanco A, Martínez-Tlahuel J, et al. Expression of platelet derived growth factor family members and the potential role of imatinib mesylate for cervical cancer. Cancer Cell Int 2006; 6: 22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Candelaria M, Árias-Bonfil D, Chávez-Blanco A, et al. Lack in efficacy for imatinib mesylate as second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer expressing PDGFR-alpha. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 1632–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Cheng WF, Chen CA, Lee CN, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 761–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Monk BJ, Sill MW, Burger RA, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1069–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Kurtz E, Hardy-Bessard AC, Deslandres M, et al. Cetuximab, topotecan and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: a phase IIGINECO trial. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 16–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding have been used in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso Duenãs-González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duenãs-González, A., Cetina, L., Coronel, J. et al. Pharmacotherapy Options for Locally Advanced and Advanced Cervical Cancer. Drugs 70, 403–432 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11534370-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11534370-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation