Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics of Vandetanib in Subjects with Renal or Hepatic Impairment

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Vandetanib, an oncology drug being evaluated in phase III clinical trials, undergoes significant renal and hepatic excretion. The objective of these two studies was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment in comparison with healthy subjects.

Subjects and Methods

Two open-label, parallel-group studies were conducted at a single centre in Germany. Subjects aged 18-75 years with a body mass index of 18–32 kg/m2 were eligible. The renal impairment study recruited subjects with normal renal function and mild, moderate and severe renal impairment according to creatinine clearance calculated from a 24-hour urine collection pre-dose. The hepatic impairment study recruited subjects with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment according to the Child-Pugh classification. All subjects received a single 800mg oral vandetanib dose. Blood samples for measurement of vandetanib, N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide were collected before and at various timepoints after vandetanib administration for up to 63 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods.

Results

Thirty-two subjects were recruited for the renal impairment study (ten with normal renal function and six, ten and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). Thirty subjects were recruited for the hepatic impairment study (eight with normal hepatic function and eight, eight and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) values of free vandetanib increased by approximately 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. These increases were statistically significant, with the increase in the severe renal impairment group having the possibility of being double the value observed in subjects with normal renal function (geometric least squares [GLS] mean ratio [renal impairment: normal renal function] of 1.79; 90% CI 1.39, 2.31). Peak plasma concentrations of free vandetanib increased slightly by approximately 7%, 9% and 11% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Total plasma clearance of free vandetanib decreased with all degrees of renal dysfunction. Hepatic impairment did not have a statistically significant effect on the AUC of total vandetanib. Peak plasma concentrations of total vandetanib were reduced in subjects with all classifications of hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function, with a statistically significant effect in the severe hepatic impairment group (GLS mean ratio 0.71; 90% CI 0.53, 0.96). Increased exposure to both metabolites was seen in subjects with renal impairment. Exposure to N-desmethylvandetanib was reduced in subjects with hepatic impairment, while exposure to vandetanib N-oxide was increased in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. Vandetanib was well tolerated and had a similar tolerability profile in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects.

Conclusion

Exposure to vandetanib was increased by about 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. A doubling in exposure could be ruled out in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment but not for those with severe renal impairment. The possibility of dose reductions in patients with severe renal impairment will need to be assessed when the safety and tolerability profile is fully defined. Exposure to vandetanib was not altered in subjects with hepatic impairment, and no dose adjustment would be expected in patients with hepatic impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Table III
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Table IV.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000; 100: 57–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hennequin LF, Stokes ES, Thomas AP, et al. Novel 4-anilinoquinazolines with C-7 basic side chains: design and structure activity relationship of a series of potent, orally active, VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 2002; 45: 1300–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wedge SR, Ogilvie DJ, Dukes M, et al. ZD6474 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, angiogenesis, and tumor growth following oral administration. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 4645–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciardiello F, Caputo R, Damiano V, et al. Antitumor effects of ZD6474, a small molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with additional activity against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 1546–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlomagno F, Vitagliano D, Guida T, et al. ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of KDR tyrosine kinase activity, efficiently blocks oncogenic RET kinases. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 7284–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vitagliano D, Carlomagno F, Motti ML, et al. Regulation of p27Kip1 protein levels contributes to mitogenic effects of the RET/PTC kinase in thyroid carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 3823–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morabito A, Piccirillo MC, Falasconi F, et al. Vandetanib (ZD6474), a dual inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinases: current status and future directions. Oncologist 2009; 14: 378–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heymach JV, Johnson BE, Prager D, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study of vandetanib plus docetaxel in previously treated non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4270–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heymach JV, Paz-Ares L, De Braud F, et al. Randomized phase II study of vandetanib alone or with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5407–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Natale RB, Bodkin D, Govindan R, et al. ZD6474 versus gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC: final results from a two-part, double-blind, randomized phase II trial [abstract no. 7000]. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (18S) [online]. Available from URL: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/18_suppl/7000 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  11. Natale RB, Bodkin D, Govindan R, et al. Vandetanib versus gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a two-part, double-blind, randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2523–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wells Jr SA, Gosnell JE, Gagel RF, et al. Vandetanib in metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer: follow-up results of an open-label phase II trial [abstract no. 6018]. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (18S) [online]. Available from URL: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/18_suppl/6018 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  13. Haddad RI, Krebs AD, Vasselli J, et al. A phase II open-label study of vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer [abstract no. 6024]. J Clin Oncol 2009; 26 (15S) [online]. Available from URL: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/15_suppl/6024 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  14. Donelli MG, Zucchetti M, Munzone E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents in patients with impaired liver function. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 33–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman A, White RM. Cytotoxic anticancer agents and renal impairment study: the challenge remains. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 533–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dreisbach AW, Lertora JJ. The effect of chronic renal failure on drug metabolism and transport. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 4: 1065–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabardi S, Abramson S. Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease. Med Clin North Am 2005; 89: 649–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Delco F, Tchambaz L, Schlienger R, et al. Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease. Drug Saf 2005; 28: 529–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Verbeeck RK. Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 64: 1147–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2005

  21. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA. Draft guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling [revision 1]. Rockville (MD): FDA, 2010 Mar [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM204959.pdf [Accessed 2010 Jun 22]

  22. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency. Note for guidance on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with impaired renal function [reference no. CHMP/EWP/225/02]. London: European Medicines Agency, 2004 Jun 23 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/022502en.pdf [Accessed 2010 Jun 22]

  23. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US FDA. Guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired hepatic function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling [online]. Rockville (MD): FDA, 2003 May [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidance ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm072123.pdf [Accessed 2010 Jun 22]

  24. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of medicinal products in patients with impaired hepatic function [reference no. CPMP/EWP/2339/02]. London: European Medicines Agency, 2004 Jun 23 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/022502en.pdf [Accessed 2010 Jun 22]

  25. de Boer R, Arrieta O, Gottfried M, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed versus pemetrexed as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZEAL) [abstract no. A8010]. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (15S) [online]. Available from URL: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/15S/8010 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  26. Herbst RS, Sun Y, Korfee S, et al. Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZODIAC) [abstract no. CRA8003]. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (18S) [online]. Available from URL: http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/18S/CRA8003 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  27. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2007

  28. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16: 31–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siegel-Lakhai WS, Crul M, De Porre P, et al. Clinical and pharmacologic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in cancer patients with normal or mildly or moderately impaired hepatic function. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4558–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibbons J, Egorin MJ, Ramanathan RK, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal dysfunction: a study by the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 570–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2000

  33. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2004

  34. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2006

  35. Data on file, AstraZeneca, 2008

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported financially by AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca was responsible for the design and conduct of the study, overall management, data collection and analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors listed were involved in critical review and revision of the manuscript, and all provided final approval of the content.

The authors thank Jennifer Stewart, MSc, of InforMed (Macclesfield, UK) for her assistance in the manuscript preSimpleParation, which was funded by AstraZeneca.

Paul Martin, Robert Smith, Stuart Oliver, Peter Langmuir and Jessica Read are employees of AstraZeneca. Angelika Weil and Karl-Heinz Molz have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weil, A., Martin, P., Smith, R. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Vandetanib in Subjects with Renal or Hepatic Impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet 49, 607–618 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11534330-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11534330-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation