Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Experience with Pheochromocytoma in a Single Centre Over 16 Years

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma are rare tumours of neuroectodermal origin. Pheochromocytoma occurs in 0.1–2% of people with hypertension, while the incidence rises to 4–5% in patients with incidental adrenal mass.

Aim: To analyse the presentation, diagnosis and localization, pathology, molecular genetic aspects, surgical management and long-term outcome of a large series of patients with pheochromocytoma referred to a single centre.

Methods: From 1992 to 2008, we observed 91 patients with pheochromocytoma, 70 (77%) with the sporadic form and 21 (23%) with the hereditary form. In the group with the hereditary form, the mean age at diagnosis was significantly lower than the mean age of the group with the sporadic form (38 vs 48 years; p < 0.001).

Results: Eighty (88%) patients with pheochromocytoma were symptomatic and the classical triad of palpitations, headache and diaphoresis was present in 30% of patients. In 12% of patients, the pheochromocytoma was discovered during radiological images (adrenal incidentaloma). The unilateral adrenal localization was observed in 78% of patients, bilateral in 15% and extra-adrenal in 7% of patients. All pheochromocytoma patients underwent surgical procedure and the laparotomic approach was used in 49 (53%) patients, while the laparoscopic approach was performed in 42 (47%) patients. Pheochromocytoma was benign in 86 patients (93%) [mean size was 4.3 cm] and the malignant form was found in five patients (7%) [mean size was 10 cm].

Conclusions: These data from a large cohort of patients are consistent with those reported in the literature and show that pheochromocytoma is an in important challenge for clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bausch B, Boedeker CC, Berlis A, et al. Genetic and clinical investigation of pheochromocytoma: a 22-year experience, from Freiburg, Germany to international effort. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006 Aug; 1073: 122–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, et al. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Feb; 85(2): 637–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, et al. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet 2005 Aug 20-26; 366(9486): 665–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reisch N, Peczkowska M, Januszewicz A, et al. Pheochromocytoma: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. J Hypertens 2006 Dec; 24(12): 2331–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manger WM. An overview of pheochromocytoma: history, current concepts, vagaries, and diagnostic challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006 Aug; 1073: 1–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenhofer G, Bornstein SR, Brouwers FM, et al. Malignant pheochromocytoma: current status and initiatives for future progress. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004 Sep; 11(3): 423–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neumann HP, Berger DP, Sigmund G, et al. Pheochromocytomas, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, and von Hippel-Lindau disease. N Engl J Med 1993 Nov 18; 329(21): 1531–8. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1994 Dec 1; 331 (22): 1535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al., European-American Paraganglioma Study Group. Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA 2004 Aug 25; 292(8): 943–51. Erratum in: JAMA 2004 Oct 13; 292 (14): 1686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Institute of Health. Neurofibromatosis: conference statement. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch Neurol 1988; 45: 575–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, et al. The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA 1997 Jul 2; 278(1): 51–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bausch B, Borozdin W, Mautner VF, et al., European-American Phaeochromocytoma Registry Study Group. Germline NF1 mutational spectra and loss-of-heterozygosity analyses in patients with pheochromocytoma and neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 Jul; 92(7): 2784–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension; European Society of Cardiology. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [published erratum appears in J Hypertens 2007 Aug; 25 (8): 1749]. J Hypertens 2007 Jun; 25(6): 1105–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lloyd RV, Tischer AS, Kimura N, et al. Adrenal tumors: introduction. In: DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, et al., editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004: 136–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al., Freiburg-Warsaw-Columbus Pheochromocytoma Study Group. germline mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 2002 May 9; 346(19): 1459–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bravo EL, Tagle R. Pheochromocytoma: state-of-the-art and future prospects. Endocr Rev 2003 Aug; 24(4): 539–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dluhy RG. Pheochromocytoma: death of an axiom. N Engl JMed 2002 May 9; 346(19): 1486–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maher ER, Eng C. The pressure rises: update on the genetics of phaeochromocytoma. Hum Mol Genet 2002 Oct 1; 11(20): 2347–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo H, Roman S. Pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma. Curr Opin Oncol 2005 Jan; 17(1): 13–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toledo SP, dos Santos MA, Toledo Rde A, et al. Impact of RET proto-oncogene analysis on the clinical management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006 Feb; 61(1): 59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gimm O, Koch CA, Januszewicz A, et al. The genetic basis of pheochromocytoma. Front Horm Res 2004; 31: 45–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peczkowska M, Januszewicz A. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Fam Cancer 2005; 4(1): 25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Modigliani E, Vasen HM, Raue K, et al. Pheochromocytoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: European study. The Euromen Study Group. J Intern Med 1995 Oct; 238(4): 363–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Teh BT. Multiple endocrine neoplasia. J Intern Med 2003 Jun; 253(6): 588–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eng C, Crossey PA, Mulligan LM, et al. Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene and the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumour suppressor gene in sporadic and syndromic phaeochromocytomas. J Med Genet 1995 Dec; 32(12): 934–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R, et al. Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Q J Med 1990 Nov; 77(283): 1151–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedrich CA. Genotype-phenotype correlation in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2001 Apr; 10(7): 763–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Opocher G, Conton P, Schiavi F, et al. Pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and neurofibromatosis type 1. Fam Cancer 2005; 4(1): 13–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cawthon RM, Weiss R, Xu GF, et al. A major segment of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene: cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and point mutations. Cell 1990 Jul 13; 62(1): 193–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Basu TN, Gutmann DH, Fletcher JA, et al. Aberrant regulation of ras proteins in malignant tumour cells from type 1 neurofibromatosis patients. Nature 1992 Apr 23; 356(6371): 713–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Walther MM, Herring J, Enquist E, et al. von Recklinghausen’s disease and pheochromocytomas. J Urol 1999 Nov; 162(5): 1582–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cotesta D, Erlic Z, Petramala L, et al. Coincidence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Endocrinologist 2008; 6: 277–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eng C, Kiuru M, Fernandez MJ, et al. A role for mitochondrial enzymes in inherited neoplasia and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 2003 Mar; 3(3): 193–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Favier J, Rustin P, et al. Functional consequences of a SDHB gene mutation in an apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 Oct; 87(10): 4771–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet 2001 Jul; 69(1): 49–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Amar L, Bertherat J, Baudin E, et al. Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma or functional paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol 2005 Dec 1; 23(34): 8812–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, et al. PGL.NET network. The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009 Aug; 94(8): 2817–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Whiting MJ, Doogue MP. Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines. Clin Biochem Rev 2009 Feb; 30(1): 3–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Procopiou M, Finney H, Akker SA, et al. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for plasma-free metanephrines in the diagnosis of catecholamine-secreting tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 2009 Jul; 161(1): 131–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al. Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. International Symposium on Pheochromocytoma; 2005 Oct. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2007 Feb; 3(2): 92–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacques AE, Sahdev A, Sandrasagara M, et al. Adrenal phaeochromocytoma: correlation of MRI appearances with histology and function. Eur Radiol 2008 Dec; 18(12): 2885–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eisenhofer G. Pheochromocytoma: recent advances and speed bumps in the road to further progress. J Hypertens 2006 Dec; 24(12): 2341–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Babamoto KS, Hirokawa WT. Doxazosin: a new alpha 1-adrenergic antagonist. Clin Pharm 1992 May; 11(5): 415–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kinney MA, Narr BJ, Warner MA. Perioperative management of pheochromocytoma. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002 Jun; 16(3): 359–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Prys-Roberts C, Farndon JR. Efficacy and safety of doxazosin for perioperative management of patients with pheochromocytoma. World J Surg 2002 Aug; 26(8): 1037–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Janetschek G, Finkenstedt G, Gasser R, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytoma: adrenalectomy, partial resection, excision of paragangliomas. J Urol 1998 Aug; 160(2): 330–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Möbius E, Nies C, Rothmund M. Surgical treatment of pheochromocytomas: laparoscopic or conventional? Surg Endosc 1999 Jan; 13(1): 35–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Joris JL, Chiche JD, Canivet JL, et al. Hemodynamic changes induced by laparoscopy and their endocrine correlates: effects of clonidine. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 Nov; 32(5): 1389–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is not under active consideration for publication, has not been accepted for publication, nor has it been published, in full or in part. We confirm that the study has been approved by the ethics committee of our institution (Department of Clinical Sciences “Sapienza” University, Rome, Italy).

The authors have no conflicts of interest and each of them have read and approved the article. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Letizia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cotesta, D., Petramala, L., Serra, V. et al. Clinical Experience with Pheochromocytoma in a Single Centre Over 16 Years. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 16, 183–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/11530430-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11530430-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation