Skip to main content
Log in

Oropharyngeal Pemphigus Vulgaris and Clinical Remission

A Long-Term, Longitudinal Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Oropharyngeal Pemphigus Vulgaris and Clinical Remission
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The pattern of clinical remission in pemphigus vulgaris patients still remains a controversial issue because of the limited data reported in the literature.

Objective: To evaluate the time to clinical remission in patients with exclusive oropharyngeal pemphigus vulgaris.

Methods: We conducted a long-term, longitudinal study in a university hospital. We treated 37 patients with oropharyngeal pemphigus vulgaris, who underwent a periodic follow-up for an average of 5.3 years, and evaluated their outcome in terms of clinical remission. The main outcome measure was the clinical outcome (assessed by objective measures of severity, extent of disease, intensity of therapy, and remission) before and after conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Results: Complete and long-lasting clinical remission was achieved in 35 patients (94.6%) with oropharyngeal lesions, of whom 13 (35.1%) were off therapy and 21 (56.8%) were on therapy at the last evaluation. One patient (2.7%) died following a stroke 3 years after complete remission on therapy. Partial remission was achieved in two patients (5.4%). The mean time to achieve complete clinical remission was 4.7 ± 2.57 months after commencement of therapy. In all patients the mean disease severity score decreased from 7.81 ± 1.35 at time of diagnosis to 1.0 ± 0.9 at time of clinical remission (p < 0.0001 vs baseline), while the extent of the disease decreased from 2.9 ± 1.0 to 0.27 ± 0.45 (p < 0.0019 vs baseline) and the intensity of therapy from 4.91 ± 0.64 to 0.70 ± 0.57 (p < 0.0001 vs baseline). The mean duration of complete remission was 63.53 ± 44.9 months.

Conclusions: In almost all patients with oropharyngeal pemphigus vulgaris it was possible to schedule a safe tapering of the conventional immunosuppressive therapy very shortly after the disease was controlled. Thus, we may conclude that: (i) the percentage of patients with oropharyngeal pemphigus vulgaris who achieved complete long-lasting clinical remission was very high; (ii) transient lesions that healed within a week were very frequent and had to be actively controlled; (iii) if treated early, most patients had a good clinical response and could achieve a disease- and drug-free clinical remission; (iv) early treatment may prevent extension or progression of disease; (v) there is a possible role for immunosuppressive agents; and (vi) a more favorable course of the disease, in terms of attainment and duration of clinical remission and a better prognosis, seemed to be related to a rapid response to therapy rather than to the initial severity and extent of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirakata Y, Amagai M, Hanakawa Y, et al. Lack of mucosal involvement in pemphigus foliaceus may be due to low expression of desmoglein 1. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 110: 76–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amagai M, Tsunoda K, Zillikens D, et al. The clinical phenotype of pemphigus is defined by the anti-desmoglein autoantibody profile. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40 (2 Pt 1): 167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amagai M. Pemphigus as a paradigm of autoimmunity and cell adhesion. Keio J Med 2002; 51: 133–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh SW, Sami N, Ahmed RA. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: current and emerging options. Am J Clin Dermatol 2005; 6: 327–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kavusi S, Daneshpazhooh M, Farahani F, et al. Outcome of pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008; 22: 580–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herbst A, Bystryn JC. Patterns of remission in pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 422–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scully C, Paes de Almeida O, Porter SR, et al. Pemphigus vulgaris: the manifestation and long-term management of 55 patients with oral lesions. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 84–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson JC, Lozada-Nur F, Frieden I. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a review of the literature and a report on the management of 12 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84: 349–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mignogna MD, Lo Muzio L, Mignogna RE, et al. Oral pemphigus: long term behaviour and clinical response to treatment with deflazacort in sixteen cases. J Oral Pathol Med 2000; 29: 145–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bystryn JC, Rudolph JL. Pemphigus. Lancet 2005; 366: 61–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mimouni D, Nousari CH, Cummins DL, et al. Differences and similarities among expert opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 1059–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murrell DF, Dick S, Ahmed AR, et al. Consensus statement on definitions of disease, end points, and therapeutic response for pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 1043–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. David M, Weissman-Katzenelson V, Ben-Chetrit A, et al. The usefulness of immunofluorescent tests in pemphigus vulgaris patients in clinical remission. Br J Dermatol 1989; 120: 391–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Qasmi S, Aoussar A, Senouci K, et al. Impact of oral lesions on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of pemphigus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23: 469–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chrysomallis F, Ioannides D, Teknetzis A, et al. Treatment of oral pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol 1994; 33: 803–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nair PS, Moorthy PK, Yogiragan K. A study of mortality in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005; 71: 23–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele D. Mignogna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mignogna, M.D., Fortuna, G., Leuci, S. et al. Oropharyngeal Pemphigus Vulgaris and Clinical Remission. Am J Clin Dermatol 11, 137–145 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11530050-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11530050-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation