Skip to main content
Log in

Health State Values during the First Year of Drug Treatment in Early-Stage Parkinson’s Disease

A Prospective, Population-Based, Cohort Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly that may lead to both motor and non-motor symptoms with consequent severe impairment of quality of life. PD also represents a substantial economic burden on society because of the patient’s decreased ability to work, increased need for care and need for costly treatment. Evaluation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) is an important tool in cost-effectiveness analyses. To date, however, few data have become available about the utility gains or losses associated with the disease and its management.

Objectives: To evaluate the changes in health state values in patients with newly diagnosed PD during their first year of drug treatment, and to calculate the gain in QALYs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for this patient group.

Methods: In this prospective, population-based, cohort study, 199 patients with incident PD and 172 controls were followed over 1 year. Clinical data, drug use and utility scores obtained from the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) health state questionnaire were documented.

Results: Patients with PD had lower SF-6D utility scores than controls at baseline. Patients started on antiparkinsonian drugs had an improvement in mean utility scores of 0.039 from 0.667 to 0.706 (p<0.05). The ICER was h45 259 (2007 values) per QALY, of which two-thirds consisted of the costs of drugs and one-third represented the costs of clinical consultations.

Conclusion: Drug treatment in patients with early-stage PD increases health state values, but the ICER is high. Further investigations will be necessary to capture the full consequences of treatment of PD and to evaluate the efficacy of disease management in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986 Mar; 5(1): 1–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tandberg E, Larsen JP, Nessler EG, et al. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease in the county of Rogaland, Norway. Mov Disord 1995 Sep; 10(5): 541–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn NP. Cross sectional prevalence survey of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in London. BMJ 2000 Jul 1; 321(7252): 21–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alves G, Wentzel-Larsen T, Aarsland D, et al. Progression of motor impairment and disability in Parkinson disease: a population-based study. Neurology 2005 Nov 8; 65(9): 1436–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aarsland D, Karlsen K. Neuropsychiatric aspects of Parkinson’s disease. Curr Psychiatry Rep 1999 Oct; 1(1): 61–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagell P, Nordling S, Reimer J, et al. Resource use and costs in a Swedish cohort of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002 Nov; 17(6): 1213–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vossius C, Nilsen OB, Larsen JP. Parkinson’s disease and nursing home placement: the economic impact of the need for care. Eur J Neurol 2009 Feb; 16(2): 194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967 May; 17(5): 427–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fahn SER. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne D, et al., editors. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Florham Park (NJ): Macmillan Healthcare Information, 1987: 153–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dowding CH, Shenton CL, Salek SS. A review of the health-related quality of life and economic impact of Parkinson’s disease. Drugs Aging 2006; 23(9): 693–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alves G, Muller B, Herlofson K, et al. Incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Norway: the Norwegian ParkWest study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009 Aug; 80(8): 851–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwab RS, England Jr AC, editors. Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s disease. Edinburgh: Livingstone, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002 Mar; 21(2): 271–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, et al. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov; 51(11): 1115–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parkin SG, Gregory RP, Scott R, et al. Unilateral and bilateral pallidotomy for idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a case series of 115 patients. Mov Disord 2002 Jul; 17(4): 682–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noyes K, Dick AW, Holloway RG. Pramipexole and levodopa in early Parkinson’s disease: dynamic changes in cost effectiveness. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23(12): 1257–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siderowf A, Ravina B, Glick HA. Preference-based quality-of-life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2002 Jul 9; 59(1): 103–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, et al. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004 Sep; 13(9): 873–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vossius C, Gjerstad M, Baas H, et al. Drug costs for patients with Parkinson’s disease in two different European countries. Acta Neurol Scand 2006 Apr; 113(4): 228–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. LePen C, Wait S, Moutard-Martin F, et al. Cost of illness and disease severity in a cohort of French patients with Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacoeconomics 1999 Jul; 16(1): 59–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez-Martin P, Arroyo S, Rojo-Abuin JM, et al. Burden, perceived health status, and mood among caregivers of Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord 2008 Sep 15; 23(12): 1673–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The clinical data applied in this study were collected by the Norwegian ParkWest Study Group. We thank John Brazier at Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, UK, for his kind advice in generating the utility scores and in executing the study. We thank the Lars Kristian Sundseths Legat for its financial support. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinna Vossius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vossius, C., Nilsen, O.B. & Larsen, J.P. Health State Values during the First Year of Drug Treatment in Early-Stage Parkinson’s Disease. Drugs Aging 26, 973–980 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/11318750-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11318750-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation