Sports Medicine

, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp 765–777 | Cite as

Rest Interval between Sets in Strength Training

  • Belmiro Freitas de Salles
  • Roberto Simão
  • Fabrício Miranda
  • Jefferson da Silva Novaes
  • Adriana Lemos
  • Jeffrey M. Willardson
Review Article

Abstract

Strength training has become one of the most popular physical activities for increasing characteristics such as absolute muscular strength, endurance, hypertrophy and muscular power. For efficient, safe and effective training, it is of utmost importance to understand the interaction among training variables, which might include the intensity, number of sets, rest interval between sets, exercise modality and velocity of muscle action. Research has indicated that the rest interval between sets is an important variable that affects both acute responses and chronic adaptations to resistance exercise programmes. The purpose of this review is to analyse and discuss the rest interval between sets for targeting specific training outcomes (e.g. absolute muscular strength, endurance, hypertrophy and muscular power). The Scielo, Science Citation Index, National Library of Medicine, MEDLINE, Scopus, Sport Discus and CINAHL databases were used to locate previous original scientific investigations. The 35 studies reviewed examined both acute responses and chronic adaptations, with rest interval length as the experimental variable. In terms of acute responses, a key finding was that when training with loads between 50% and 90% of one repetition maximum, 3–5 minutes’ rest between sets allowed for greater repetitions over multiple sets. Furthermore, in terms of chronic adaptations, resting 3–5 minutes between sets produced greater increases in absolute strength, due to higher intensities and volumes of training. Similarly, higher levels of muscular power were demonstrated over multiple sets with 3 or 5 minutes versus 1 minute of rest between sets. Conversely, some experiments have demonstrated that when testing maximal strength, 1-minute rest intervals might be sufficient between repeated attempts; however, from a psychological and physiological standpoint, the inclusion of 3- to 5-minute rest intervals might be safer and more reliable. When the training goal is muscular hypertrophy, the combination of moderate-intensity sets with short rest intervals of 30–60 seconds might be most effective due to greater acute levels of growth hormone during such workouts. Finally, the research on rest interval length in relation to chronic muscular endurance adaptations is less clear. Training with short rest intervals (e.g. 20 seconds to 1 minute) resulted in higher repetition velocities during repeated submaximal muscle actions and also greater total torque during a high-intensity cycle test. Both of these findings indirectly demonstrated the benefits of utilizing short rest intervals for gains in muscular endurance. In summary, the rest interval between sets is an important variable that should receive more attention in resistance exercise prescription. When prescribed appropriately with other important prescriptive variables (i.e. volume and intensity), the amount of rest between sets can influence the efficiency, safety and ultimate effectiveness of a strength training programme.

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Sports Medicin. Position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 364–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 459–71Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraemer WJ, Noble BJ, Clark MJ, et al. Physiologic responses to heavy-resistance exercise with very short restperiods. Int J Sports Med 1987; 8: 247–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kraemer WJ, Marchitelli L, Gordon SE, et al. Hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise protocols. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69: 1442–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraemer WJ, Fleck SJ, Dziados JE, et al. Changes in hormonal concentrations after different heavy resistance exerciseprotocols in women. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 594–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robinson JM, Stone MH, Johnson RL, et al. Effects of different weight training exercise/rest intervals on strength,power, and high intensity exercise endurance. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9: 216–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larson GD, Potteiger JA. A comparison of three different rest intervals between multiple squat bouts. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11: 115–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Karunakara RG. Effects of rest interval on isokinetic strength and functional performanceafter short-term high intensity training. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 229–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pincivero DM, Campy RM. The effects of rest interval length and training on quadriceps femoris muscle, part I:knee extensor torque and muscle fatigue. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004; 44: 111–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goto K, Nagasawa M, Yanagisawa O, et al. Muscular adaptations to combinations of high and low intensityresistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 730–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Short vs long rest period between the sets in hypertrophic resistance training:influence on muscle strength, size, and hormonal adaptationsin trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 572–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bottaro M, Martins B, Gentil P, et al. Effects of rest duration between sets of resistance training on acute hormonalresponses in trained women. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12: 73–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ratamess NA, Falvo MJ, Mangine GT, et al. The effect rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 100: 1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill-Haas S, Bishop D, Dawson B, et al. Effects of rest interval during high-repetition resistance training onstrength, aerobic fitness, and repeated-sprint ability. J Sports Sci 2007; 25: 619–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willardson JM, Burkett LN. The effect of different rest intervals between sets on volume components and strength gains. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 146–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Willardson JM. A brief review: factors affecting the length of the rest interval between resistance exercise sets. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 978–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hopkins WG. Olympian impact factors: top journals in exercise and sports science and medicine for 2008. Eur Sport sci 2008; 12: 22–4Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Burkett LN. Single versus multiple sets for strength: a meta-analysis to address the controversy. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002; 73: 485–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development:a review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designingtraining prescription. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 950–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kraemer WJ. A series of studies: the physiological basis for strength training in American football: fact over philosophy. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11: 131–42Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richmond SR, Godard MP. The effects of varied rest periods between sets of failure using bench press in recreationallytrained men. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 846–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Willardson JM, Burkett LN. A comparison of 3 different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during a workout. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 23–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Willardson JM, Burkett LN. The effect of rest interval length on bench press performance with heavy vs light load. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 396–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Willardson JM, Burkett LN. The effect of rest interval length on the sustainability of squat and bench press repetitions. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 400–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miranda H, Fleck SJ, Simaã R, et al. Effect of two different rest period lengths on the number of repetitions performed during resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 1032–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Theou O, Gareth JR, Brown LE. Effect of rest interval on strength recovery in young and old women. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1876–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Faigenbaum AD, Ratamess NA, McFarland J, et al. Effect of rest interval length on bench press performance in boys,teens, and men. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2008; 20: 457–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weir JP, Wagner LL, Housh TJ. The effect of rest interval length on repeated maximal bench presses. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8: 58–60Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matuszak ME, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Effect of rest interval length on repeated 1 repetition maximum back squats. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 634–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris RC, Edwards RH, Hultman E, et al. The time course of phosphorylcreatine resynthesis during recovery of thequadriceps muscle in man. Pflugers Arch 1976; 28: 137–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abdessemed D, Duche P, Hautier C, et al. Effect of recovery duration on muscular power and blood lactate during thebench press exercise. Int J Sports Med 1999; 20: 368–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mccall GE, Byrnes WC, Fleck SJ, et al. Acute and chronic hormonal responses to resistance training designed topromote muscle hypertrophy. Can J Appl Physiol 1999; 24: 96–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buresh R, Berg K, French J. The effect of resistive exercise rest interval on hormonal response, strength, and hypertrophywith training. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 62–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson T, Kearney JT. Effects of three resistance training programs on muscular strength and absolute and relative endurance. Res Q Exerc Sport 1982; 53: 1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Campos GER, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistancetrainingregimens: specificity of repetition maximumtraining zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stone WJ, Coulter SP. Strength/endurance effects from three resistance training protocols with women. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8: 231–4Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stull GA, Clarke DH. Patterns of recovery following isometric and isotonic strength decrement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1971; 3: 135–9Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yates JW, Kearney JT, Noland MP, et al. Recovery of dynamic muscular endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 662–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sahlin K, Ren JM. Relationship of contraction capacity to metabolic changes during recovery from a fatiguing contraction. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 648–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bilcheck HM, Kraemer WJ, Maresh CM, et al. The effects of isokinetic fatigue on recovery of maximal isokineticconcentric and eccentric strength in women. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7: 43–50Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    García-López D, De Paz JA, Moneo E, et al. Effects of short vs long rest period between sets on elbow-flexor muscularendurance during resistance training to failure. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 1320–4PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Belmiro Freitas de Salles
    • 1
    • 2
  • Roberto Simão
    • 2
  • Fabrício Miranda
    • 2
  • Jefferson da Silva Novaes
    • 2
  • Adriana Lemos
    • 2
  • Jeffrey M. Willardson
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Research in Vascular Biology (BioVasc), Biomedical Center, State University of Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.School of Physical Education and SportsUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.Kinesiology and Sports Studies DepartmentEastern Illinois UniversityCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations