Skip to main content
Log in

Ruxolitinib

In the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

  • Adis Drug Profile
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ruxolitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAK) 1 and 2, which are involved in the signalling pathway of various cytokines and growth factors essential to haematopoiesis. JAK 1 and 2 are implicated in the development of myelofibrosis, as well as other haematological malignancies. Ruxolitinib is the first agent approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis.

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (COMFORT-I) in patients with myelofibrosis, significantly more ruxolitinib than placebo recipients achieved a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (primary endpoint) at 24 weeks. In a randomized, open-label, multicentre trial (COMFORT-II) in patients with myelofibrosis, significantly more ruxolitinib than best available therapy recipients achieved the same primary endpoint at 48 weeks.

Significantly more ruxolitinib than placebo recipients achieved a ≥50% reduction in Total Symptom Score at 24 weeks in COMFORT-I. Ruxolitinib generally improved health-related quality-of-life scores, while best available therapy was generally associated with worsened scores at 48 weeks in COMFORT-II. In COMFORT-I, overall survival data appeared to favour ruxolitinib over placebo; of note, most placebo recipients had crossed over to receive ruxolitinib. In COMFORT-II, a significant difference in overall survival between ruxolitinib and best available therapy was not shown; this trial was not powered to detect such a difference.

In clinical trials in patients with myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib was generally associated with an acceptable tolerability profile. In the placebo-controlled trial, the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events in ruxolitinib recipients were thrombocytopenia, anaemia and neutropenia. These haematological adverse events were mainly managed with dosage interruptions/reductions and/or transfusions, and rarely resulted in discontinuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klco JM, Vij R, Kreisel FH, et al. Molecular pathology of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 2010 Apr; 133(4): 602–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 2009 Jul 30; 114(5): 937–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia 2008 Feb; 22(2): 437–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Office of Rare Diseases Research, US National Insitutes of Health. Genetic and rare disease information center: myelofibrosis [online]. Available from URL: http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/GARD/Condition/8618/Myelofibrosis.aspx [Accessed 2012 Mar 14

  5. Orphanet. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?lng=EN&Expert=824 [Accessed 2012 Mar 14

  6. Gregory SA, Mesa RA, Hoffman R, et al. Clinical and laboratory features of myelofibrosis and limitations of current therapies. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2011 Sep; 9 (9 Suppl. 22): 1–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caramazza D, Begna KH, Gangat N, et al. Refined cytogenetic-risk categorization for overall and leukemia-free survival in primary myelofibrosis: a single center study of 433 patients. Leukemia 2011 Jan; 25(1): 82–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbui T, Barosi G, Birgegard G, et al. Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 2011 Feb 20; 29(6): 761–70

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tefferi A, Vainchenker W. Myeloproliferative neoplasms: molecular pathology, essential clinical understanding, and treatment strategies. J Clin Oncol 2011 Feb 10; 29(5): 573–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tefferi A. How I treat myelofibrosis. Blood 2011 Mar 31; 117(13): 3494–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy MM, Deshpande A, Sattler M. Targeting JAK2 in the therapy of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Expert Opin Ther Targets Mar; 16(3): 313–24

  12. Vainchenker W, Dusa A, Constantinescu SN. JAKs in pathology: role of Janus kinases in hematopoietic malignancies and immunodeficiencies. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2008 Aug; 19(4): 385–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrajoli A, Faderl S, Ravandi F, et al. The JAK-STAT pathway: a therapeutic target in hematological malignancies. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2006 Dec; 6(8): 671–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Incyte Corporation. Jakafi™ (ruxolitinib) oral tablets: US prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.incyte.com/products/uspi_jakafi.pdf [Accessed 2012 Feb 27

  15. European Medicines Agency. Jakavi (ruxolitinib): EU summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002464/WC500133223.pdf [Accessed 2012 Oct 8

  16. Quintas-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2012 Apr 15; 115(15): 3109–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Verstovsek S, Kantarjian H, Mesa RA, et al. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2010 Sep 16; 363(12): 1117–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012 Mar 1; 366(9): 799–807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012 Mar 1; 366(9): 787–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Gisslinger H, et al. Reductions in JAK2V617F allele burden with ruxolitinib treatment in COMFORT-II, a phase III study comparing the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib to best available therapy (BAT) [abstract no. 6514]. J Clin Oncol 2012 May 20; 30 (15 Suppl.)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shi JG, Chen X, McGee RF, et al. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of orally dosed INCB018424 phosphate in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2011 Dec; 51(12): 1644–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deshpande A, Reddy MM, Schade GO, et al. Kinase domain mutations confer resistance to novel inhibitors targeting JAK2V617F in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia 2012 Apr; 26(4): 708–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hornakova T, Springuel L, Devreux J, et al. Oncogenic JAK1 and JAK2-activating mutations resistant to ATP-competitive inhibitors. Haematologica 2011 Jun; 96(6): 845–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Groshong JS, Matta H, et al. Constitutive NF-kappB activation confers interleukin 6 (IL6) independence and resistance to dexamethasome and Janus kinase inhibitor INCB018424 in murine plasmacytoma cells. J Biol Chem 2011 Aug 12; 284(32): 27988–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shilling AD, Nedza FM, Emm T, et al. Metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetics of [14C]-INCB018424, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2010 Nov; 38(11): 2023–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Liu X, Peng S, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ruxolitinib in subjects with myelofibrosis [abstract no. PI-97]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012 Mar; 91 Suppl. 1s: S44

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ogama Y, Mineyame T, Yamamoto A, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib (INC424) in healthy Japanese volunteers: placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation phase 1 study [abstract no. 5162]. Blood 2011 Nov 18; 118(21)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shi J, Chen X, McGee R, et al. Effects of various degrees of renal impairment and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of INCB018424 [abstract no. PIII-53]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010 Feb; 87 Suppl. 1s: S84

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen X, Shi J, McGee R, et al. The effect of various degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of INCB018424 [abstract no. PIII-59]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010 Feb; 87 Suppl. 1: S86

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shi JG, Chen X, Emm T, et al. The effect of CYP3A4 inhibition or induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered ruxolitinib (INCB018424 phosphate) in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2012 Jun; 52(6): 809–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tefferi A, Litzow MR, Pardanani A. Long-term outcome of treatment with ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis [letter]. N Engl J Med 2011 Oct 13; 365(15): 1455–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Serious adverse events during ruxolitinib treatment discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86(12): 1188–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gisslinger H, McMullin MF, Jaekel N, et al. A phase Ib, open-label, dose-finding study of ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis (PET-MF) and baseline platelets (PLTs) 50 to <100 × 109/l [abstract no. TPS6642]. J Clin Oncol 2012 May 20; 30 (15 Suppl.)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Talpaz M, Hamburg SI, Jamieson K, et al. Preliminary safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) with platelet counts (PC) of 50–100 × 109/L [abstract no. 6630]. J Clin Oncol 2012 May 20; 30 (15 Suppl.)

    Google Scholar 

  35. le Coutre PD, Gisslinger H, Zachee P, et al. An open-label, multicentre, expanded access study assessing the safety and efficacy of oral ruxolitinib administered to patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or post-essential throbocythemia melo-fibrosis (PET-MF) [abstract no. TPS6640]. J Clin Oncol 2012 May 20; 30 (15 Suppl.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and Disclosures

The manuscript was reviewed by: G. Barosi, Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology and Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; R.A. Mesa, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA; F. Ravandi, Department of Leukemia, University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; S. Verstovsek, Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

The preparation of this review was not supported by any external funding. During the peer review process, the manufacturer of the agent under review was offered an opportunity to comment on this article. Changes resulting from comments received were made by the author on the basis of scientific and editorial merit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lily P. H. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, L.P.H., Keating, G.M. Ruxolitinib. Drugs 72, 2117–2127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11209340-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11209340-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation