Abstract
This article reviews the pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability profile of the 7-day lower-dose (5, 10 and 20 μg/h) buprenorphine transdermal patch (BuTrans®, Norspan®) in the management of chronic non-malignant pain, with a focus on European labelling for the drug. Buprenorphine is a semi-synthetic opioid analgesic that acts primarily as a partial agonist at the mu opioid receptor. The transdermal formulation provides continuous delivery of buprenorphine, resulting in relatively consistent plasma drug concentrations throughout the 7-day dosing interval.
The analgesic efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee has been demonstrated in several randomized controlled trials, which have shown the formulation to be equivalent to sublingual buprenorphine, noninferior to prolonged-release tramadol tablets, noninferior to codeine plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) combination tablets (when transdermal buprenorphine was used together with regularly scheduled oral paracetamol) and generally superior to a matching transdermal placebo patch. Transdermal buprenorphine was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing chronic low back pain of at least moderate severity in two randomized, double-blind, crossover trials. Other clinical trials, including a randomized, double-blind, maintenance-of-analgesia study, have also demonstrated the analgesic efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with chronic non-malignant pain of various causes.
In general, serious adverse events with transdermal buprenorphine are similar to those for other opioid analgesics. Transdermal buprenorphine has a ceiling effect for respiratory depression, and the main risk is when it is combined with other CNS depressants. The most frequently reported adverse events with transdermal buprenorphine are headache, dizziness, somnolence, constipation, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, erythema, application site pruritus and application site reactions. Transdermal buprenorphine was better tolerated than sublingual buprenorphine in a 7-week, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with osteoarthritis pain. Nevertheless, as with other opioids, persistence with transdermal buprenorphine therapy is difficult for many patients because of adverse events or other reasons.
Thus, transdermal buprenorphine has generally demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials in chronic non-malignant pain, providing effective background analgesia as part of pain management strategies for patients with osteoarthritis, low back pain and other persistent pain syndromes of at least moderate severity. It also has favourable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, which have beneficial clinical implications, most notably the convenience of once-weekly administration and no need for dosage adjustments in the elderly or those with compromised renal function, making it an opioid of choice in these patients, and a useful therapeutic option overall in the management of chronic non-malignant pain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006 May; 10(4): 287–333
World Health Organization. WHO normative guidelines on pain management [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/medicines/area/quality_safety/delphi_study_pain_guidelines.pdf [Accessed 2011 Aug 2]
Barber JB, Gibson SJ. Treatment of chronic non-malignant pain in the elderly: safety considerations. Drug Saf 2009; 32(6): 457–74
Morlion B. Pharmacotherapy of low back pain: targeting nociceptive and neuropathic pain components. Curr Med Res Opin 2011 Jan; 27(1): 11–33
World Health Organization. Scoping document for WHO treatment guidelines on chronic non-malignant pain in adults [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/Scoping_WHOGuide_non-malignant_pain_adults.pdf [Accessed 2011 Aug 2]
Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain 2009 Feb; 10(2): 113–30
Gourlay DL, Heit HA, Almahrezi A. Universal precautions in pain medicine: a rational approach to the treatment of chronic pain. Pain Med 2005; 6(2): 107–12
Pergolizzi J, Boger RH, Budd K, et al. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone). Pain Pract 2008; 8(4): 287–313
Nikolaus T, Zeyfang A. Pharmacological treatments for persistent non-malignant pain in older persons. Drugs Aging 2004; 21(1): 19–41
BuTrans 5, 10 and 20 ug/h transdermal patch: EU summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/16787 [Accessed 2011 Aug 2]
Butrans (buprenorphine) Transdermal System for transdermal administration: US prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.purduepharma.com/pi/prescription/butranspi.pdf [Accessed 2011 Aug 2]
Transtec 35, 52.5 and 70 micrograms transdermal patch: EU summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicines.org.uk/EMC/medicine/8864/SPC/Transtec+35%2c+52.5+and+70+micrograms++transdermal+patch/ [Accessed 2011 Aug 16]
Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, et al. Buprenorphine: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1979 Feb; 17(2): 81–110
Evans HC, Easthope SE. Transdermal buprenorphine. Drugs 2003; 63(19): 1999–2010; discussion 2011-2
Kress HG. Clinical update on the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine. Eur J Pain 2009 Mar; 13(3): 219–30
Johnson RE, Fudala PJ, Payne R. Buprenorphine: considerations for pain management. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005 Mar; 29(3): 297–326
Cowan A, Lewis JW, Macfarlane IR. Agonist and antagonist properties of buprenorphine, a new antinociceptive agent. Br J Pharmacol 1977 Aug; 60(4): 537–45
Walsh SL, Preston KL, Stitzer ML, et al. Clinical pharmacology of buprenorphine: ceiling effects at high doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994 May; 55(5): 569–80
Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, Griffith JD. Human pharmacology and abuse potential of the analgesic buprenorphine: a potential agent for treating narcotic addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978 Apr; 35(4): 501–16
Huang P, Kehner GB, Cowan A, et al. Comparison of pharmacological activities of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine: norbuprenorphine is a potent opioid agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001 May; 297(2): 688–95
Negus SS, Bidlack JM, Mello NK, et al. Delta opioid antagonist effects of buprenorphine in rhesus monkeys. Behav Pharmacol 2002 Nov; 13(7): 557–70
Andresen T, Staahl C, Oksche A, et al. Effect of transdermal opioids in experimentally induced superficial, deep and hyperalgesic pain. Br J Pharmacol 2011 Oct; 164(3): 934–45
Dahan A, Yassen A, Romberg R, et al. Buprenorphine induces ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2006 May; 96(5): 627–32
Dahan A. Opioid-induced respiratory effects: new data on buprenorphine. Palliat Med 2006; 20 Suppl. 1: S3–8
Zaki PA, Keith DE, Brine GA, et al. Ligand-induced changes in surface mu-opioid receptor number: relationship to G protein activation? J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000 Mar; 292(3): 1127–34
Mundin GE, Smith KJ, Bailey P. Pharmacokinetics of transdermal buprenorphine compared with sublingual buprenorphine in healthy volunteers [poster]. Royal College of General Practitioners Annual Primary Care Conference; 2011 Oct 20–22; Liverpool
Kitzmiller J, Groen D, Singh A, et al. Multiple-application pharmacokinetics and adhesion analyses of a buprenorphine transdermal system [abstract no. 328]. J Pain 2011 Apr; 12 Suppl. 1 (4): P58
Schofield J, Smith KJ, Mundin G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine 5 micrograms/hour transdermal analgesic patch when applied at four application sites in healthy elderly subjects of varying body fat composition [abstract no. PH307]. 12th World Congress on Pain; 2008 Aug 17–22; Glasgow
Moody DE, Chang Y, Huang W, et al. The in vivo response of novel buprenorphine metabolites, M1 and M3, to anti-retroviral inducers and inhibitors of buprenorphine metabolism. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2009 Sep 1; 105(3): 211–5
Breivik H, Ljosaa TM, Stengaard-Pedersen K, et al. A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naive to potent opioids. Scand J Pain 2010; 1(3): 122–41
James IG, O’Brien CM, McDonald CJ. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine (BuTrans seven-day patches) with buprenorphine sublingual tablets (Temgesic) in patients with osteoarthritis pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010 Aug; 40(2): 266–78
Karlsson M, Berggren AC. Efficacy and safety of low-dose transdermal buprenorphine patches (5, 10, and 20microg/h) versus prolonged-release tramadol tablets (75, 100, 150, and 200mg) in patients with chronic osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group noninferiority study. Clin Ther 2009 Mar; 31(3): 503–13
Munera C, Drehobl M, Sessler NE, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group, 5-week study of buprenorphine transdermal system in adults with osteoarthritis. J Opioid Manag 2010; 6(3): 193–202
Conaghan PG, O’Brien CM, Wilson M, et al. Transdermal buprenorphine plus oral paracetamol vs an oral codeine-paracetamol combination for osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee: a randomised trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 930–8
Schutter U, Ritzdorf R, Heckes B. Chronic osteoarthritis pain: efficacy and safety of a 7-day patch with low-dose buprenorphine: results of a multicenter observational study [in German]. MMW-Fortschr Med 2008; (II): 96–103
Gordon A, Callaghan D, Spink D, et al. Buprenorphine transdermal system in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, followed by an open-label extension phase. Clin Ther 2010 May; 32(5): 844–60
Gordon A, Rashiq S, Moulin DE, et al. Buprenorphine transdermal system for opioid therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Res Manag 2010; 15(3): 169–78
Steiner D, Munera C, Hale M, et al. The efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in subjects with moderate to severe low back pain: a double-blind study [abstract no. 305]. J Pain 2009 Apr; 10 Suppl. 1 (4):S51
Yabuki S, Konno S, Kataoka M, et al. Efficacy and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study [abstract no. PM 391]. 13th World Congress on Pain; 2010 Aug 29–Sep 2; Montreal (QC)
Landau CJ, Carr WD, Razzetti AJ, et al. Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system in adults with persistent non-cancer-related pain syndromes who require opioid therapy: a multicenter, 5-week run-in and randomized, double-blind maintenance-of-analgesia study. Clin Ther 2007 Oct; 29(10): 2179–93
Skurtveit S, Furu K, Kaasa S, et al. Introduction of low dose transdermal buprenorphine: did it influence use of potentially addictive drugs in chronic non-malignant pain patients? Eur J Pain 2009 Oct; 13(9): 949–53
Husebo BS, Ballard C, Sandvik R, et al. Efficacy of treating pain to reduce behavioural disturbances in residents of nursing homes with dementia: cluster randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2011; 343: d4065
Gallagher AM, Leighton-Scott J, van Staa TP. Utilization characteristics and treatment persistence in patients prescribed low-dose buprenorphine patches in primary care in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Ther 2009 Aug; 31(8): 1707–15
Schutter U, Ritzdorf I, Heckes B. 7-day buprenorphine patch: an option when therapy with tramadol or tilidine/naloxone is inadequate. Results of a non-intervention study [in German]. MMW-Fortschr Med 2010; 152(II): 62–9
Böhme K, Heckes B, Thomitzek K. Seven-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in multimorbid patients on long-term ibuprofen or diclofenac [in German]. MMW-Fortschr Med 2010; 152(IV): 125–32
American College of Rheumatology. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [online]. Available from URL: http://www.rheumatology.org/practice/cliical/clinicianresearchers/outcomes-instrumentation/WOMAC.asp [Accessed 2011 Aug 12]
Shevchuk YM, Plosker GL. A medical marvel: the powerful placebo effect. Can Pharm J 1987 Oct; 120: 597–601
Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL. The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet 1978 Sep 23; 2(8091): 654–7
Department of Health and Ageing (Australia). Public summary documents by product: burpenorphine, transdermal patch, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg (releasing 5 micrograms, 10 micrograms and 20 micrograms per hour respectively), Norspan®, July 2005 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pbac-psd-buprenorphine [Accessed 2011 Oct 13]
Wen W, Lynch S, Munera C, et al. Time dependency of adverse events with Butrans (buprenorphine) transdermal system [abstract no. 346]. J Pain 2011 Apr; 12 Suppl. 1 (4): P62
Wen W, Lynch S, Munera C, et al. Application site adverse events of Butrans (buprenorphine) transdermal system [abstract no. 347]. J Pain 2011 Apr; 12 Suppl. 1 (4): P62
Wen W, Lynch S, Munera C, et al. The adverse event profile of Butrans (buprenorphine) transdermal system in patients ≥65 and <65 years of age [abstract no. 348]. J Pain 2011 Apr; 12 Suppl. 1 (4): P63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: R.L. Barkin, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Centers of Evanston and Skokie Hospitals, Evanston and Skokie, IL, USA; H. Breivik, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; A. Gordon, Wasser Pain Management Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; J.J. Hernandez, Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Rosario University, Bogota, Colombia; P.E. Hess, Departments of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Data Selection
Sources: Medical literature (including published and unpublished data) on ‘buprenorphine’ was identified by searching databases since 1996 (including MEDLINE and EMBASE and in-house AdisBase), bibliographies from published literature, clinical trial registries/databases and websites (including those of regional regulatory agencies and the manufacturer). Additional information (including contributory unpublished data) was also requested from the company developing the drug.
Search strategy: MEDLINE, EMBASE and AdisBase search terms were ‘buprenorphine’ and (‘patch’ or ‘transdermal’ or ‘transdermal patch’ or ‘administration, topical’ or ‘transdermal drug administration’). Searches were last updated 10 November 2011.
Selection: Studies in patients with chronic non-malignant pain who received lower-dose transdermal buprenorphine. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology were preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data are also included.
Index terms: Buprenorphine, transdermal, lower-dose, non-malignant pain, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, tolerability.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plosker, G.L. Buprenorphine 5, 10 and 20 μg/h Transdermal Patch. Drugs 71, 2491–2509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11208250-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11208250-000000000-00000