Skip to main content

Fondaparinux

A Pharmacoeconomic Review of its Use in the Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract

Fondaparinux (Arixtra®) is an anticoagulant that selectively inhibits activated factor X, thereby interrupting the blood coagulation cascade.

In OASIS-5, a large pivotal trial in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), subcutaneous fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily was noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin 1mg/kg twice daily (both agents were administered over a mean of about 5 days in combination with antiplatelet therapy) in reducing death or ischaemic events at 9 days, and the efficacy was maintained for up to 6 months (study end). However, fondaparinux was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding than enoxaparin in the first 9 days, and at 3 and 6 months. This lower rate of bleeding led to lower longterm mortality and morbidity with fondaparinux than with enoxaparin.

In modelled cost-utility analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in Spain, France and the US with a lifetime horizon, fondaparinux once daily was predicted to be cost effective relative to enoxaparin twice daily with regard to the incremental cost per QALY gained. In Spain and the US, fondaparinux dominated enoxaparin (i.e. was less costly and more effective) and, in the French analysis, the incremental cost per QALY gained with fondaparinux versus enoxaparin was well within recommended thresholds. Results of short-term (6-month) cost analyses in the US and France also favoured fondaparinux over enoxaparin. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that base-case conclusions were robust over a range of parameter estimates and assumptions, including plausible variations in baseline risk of a cardiac event or baseline risk of bleeding.

In conclusion, in patients with NSTE-ACS receiving antiplatelet therapy, fondaparinux was cost effective relative to enoxaparin in cost-utility analyses in Europe and the US. This cost advantage primarily reflects the lower rate of bleeding with fondaparinux than with enoxaparin and the lower rate of mortality and morbidity over the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

References

  1. Coons JC, Battistone S. 2007 Guideline update for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: focus on antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. Ann Pharmacother 2008 Jul; 42 (7): 989–1001

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007 Jul; 28 (13): 1598–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoekstra J, Cohen M. Management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a critical review of the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines. Int J Clin Pract 2009 Apr; 63 (4): 642–55

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. European Medicines Agency. Summary of product characteristics. Arixtra 1.5mg/0.3mL solution for injection [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/arixtra/H-403-PI-en.pdf [Accessed 2010 Apr 3]

  5. Blick SK, Orman JS, Wagstaff AJ, et al. Fondaparinux sodium: a review of its use in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2008; 8 (2): 113–25

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakhai A, Flather MD, Collinson JR, et al. National economic impact of tirofiban for unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: example from the United Kingdom. Int J Cardiol 2003 Oct; 91 (2-3): 163–72

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2010 update. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. British Heart Foundation Statistics Website. Coronary heart disease statistics 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.heartstats.org/datapage.asp?id=7998 [Accessed 2010 May 6]

  9. Etemad LR, McCollam PL. Total first-year costs of acute coronary syndrome in a managed care setting. J Manage Care Pharm 2005; 11 (4): 300–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Access Economics. The economic costs of heart attack and chest pain (acute coronary syndrome) [online]. Available from URL: http://www.accesseconomics.com.au/publicationsreports/getreport.php?report=204&id=262 [Accessed 2010 May 12]

  11. Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006 Apr 6; 354 (14): 1464–76

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MICHELANGELO OASIS 5 Steering Committee, Mehta SR, Yusuf F, et al. Design and rationale of the MICHELANGELO Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS)-5 trial program evaluating fondaparinux, a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2005 Dec; 150 (6): 1107–10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (18): 1742–51

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sculpher MJ, Lozano-Ortega G, Sambrook J, et al. Fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: short-term cost and long-term cost-effectiveness using data from the Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes Investigators (OASIS-5) trial. Am Heart J 2009 May; 157 (5): 845–52

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Latour-Perez J, de-Miguel-Balsa E. Cost effectiveness of fondaparinux in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Pharmacoeconomics 2009; 27 (7): 585–95

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sculpher MJ, Lozano-Ortega G, Sambrook JC, et al. Costeffectiveness in France of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: an analysis using data from OASIS-5 [abstract no. 4804]. Eur Heart J 2007 Sep; 28 Abstr. Suppl.: 858

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramanath VS, Eagle KA. Evidence-based medical therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2007; 7 (2): 95–116

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maxwell CB, Holdford DA, Crouch MA, et al. Costeffectiveness analysis of anticoagulation strategies in non- ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Pharmacother 2009 Apr; 43 (4): 586–95

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carter NJ, McCormack PL, Plosker GL. Enoxaparin: a review of its use in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Drugs 2008; 68 (5): 691–710

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao SV, O’Grady K, Pieper KS, et al. Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96 (9): 1200–6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate McKeage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKeage, K., Lyseng-Williamson, K.A. Fondaparinux. Pharmacoeconomics 28, 687–698 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11205130-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11205130-000000000-00000

Keywords

  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Enoxaparin
  • Major Bleeding
  • Fondaparinux