Advertisement

Cleansing and Moisturizing in Acne Patients

  • Greg Goodman
Review Article

Abstract

Affecting over 80% of adolescents, acne is a widespread condition with substantial negative physical and emotional effects, and significant societal cost. Cleansing the acne patient involves several considerations, including matching skin type to the right type of cleanser, optimal times and methods of cleansing, treating parts of the body other than the face, and patient perceptions of the cause and treatment of acne. Moisturizing prevents and alleviates skin irritation, soothing the skin by slowing the evaporation of water. Many liquid face cleansers also moisturize, which may be all that is needed for a patient with oily skin. Protection from sun and environmental damage is important for all patients. While sunscreens are often irritants, the best options for young, oily, acne-prone skin tend to have a water or light liquid base. Moisturizing sunscreens are appropriate for patients with dry, sun-damaged skin, as well as those who wear makeup, have other skin diseases, or are easily irritated by products. Overall, treating acne patients should include education in patient-friendly terms and promoting healthy daily skin care practices, including cleansing and protection against environmental damage.

Keywords

Acne Dermatol Benzoyl Peroxide Skin Type Alopecia Areata 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kraning KK, Odland GE. Prevalence, morbidity and cost of dermatologic diseases. J Invest Dermatol 1979; 79: 395–401Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mallon E, Newton JN, Klassen A, et al. The quality of life in acne: a comparison with general medical conditions using generic questionnaires. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140 (4): 672–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Management of acne: summary, evidence report/technology assessment: no. 17 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/acnesum.htm [Accessed 2008 Dec 2]
  4. 4.
    Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and suicidal ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139 (5): 846–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19 (4): 303–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sulzberger MB, Zaidems SH. Psychogenic factors in dermatological disorders. Med Clinicians North Am 1948; 32: 669–85Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Draelos ZD. The effect of a daily facial cleanser for normal to oily skin on the skin barrier of subjects with acne. Cutis 2006; 78 (1 Suppl.): 34–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Imokawa G. Surfactant-induced depletion of ceramides and other intercellular lipids: implication for the mechanism leading to dehydration of the stratum corneum. Exog Dermatol 2003; 3: 81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bikowski J. The use of cleansers as therapeutic concomitants in various dermatologic disorders. Cutis 2001; 68 (5 Suppl.): 12–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Subramanyan K. Role of mild cleansing in the management of patient skin. Dermatol Ther 2004; 17 Suppl. 1: 26–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porter MR. Handbook of surfactants. London: Blackie Academic and Professional,1994Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schreiner V, Maerker H, Hoppe U. Dependence of barrier repair in human skin on intra— and extracellular pH. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106: 917Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Epstein HA. Anatomy of a skin cleanser. Skinmed 2005; 4 (3): 183–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tan JK, Vasey K, Fung KY. Beliefs and perceptions of patients with acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44 (3): 439–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green, J. Sinclair RD. Perceptions of acne vulgaris in final year medical student written examination answers. Australas J Dermatol 2001; 42 (2): 98–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baumann L. The skin type solution. New York: Bantam Books, 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susitaival P, Flyvholm MA, Meding B, et al. Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Derm 2003; 49 (2): 70–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Draelos ZD, Matsubara A, Smiles K. The effect of 2% niacinamide on facial sebum production. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2006; 8 (2): 96–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    British Association of Dermatologists. Sunscreen and skin cancer factsheet. 2008[online]. Available from URL: http://www.bad.org.uk/public/cancer/BAD_&__BSF_SUNSCREEN_FACT_SHEET.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jun 11]
  20. 20.
    Funk JO, Dromgoole SH, Maibach HI. Sunscreen intolerance. Contact sensitization, photocontact sensitization, and irritancy of sunscreen agents. Dermatol Clin 1995; 13 (2): 473–81PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Skin and Cancer Foundation of Victoria, and Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations