Advertisement

Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 3–8 | Cite as

Back Pain as a Distraction Pain Syndrome

A Window to a Whole New Dynamic in Integrative Medicine
  • David Schechter
  • Arthur Smith
Current Opinion

Abstract

One of the most intractable and expensive problems facing modern medicine today is chronic, nonspecific back pain. The current approach, which attributes the pain to structural problems, is invasive, expensive and not very effective. Based on this fact, along with a growing body of clinical and circumstantial evidence, we believe that it may be time for a paradigm shift in diagnosis and treatment, in which the problem is treated in an integrative fashion as more psychosomatic than structural. Although, in our conception, the pain is both real and ‘physical’, in the sense that it is experienced physically and may involve functional alterations in the affected tissues, we present a rationale that melds the purely ‘physical’ and purely ‘psychological’ conceptions of pain into an integrated model that is clinically significant. We believe that the ultimate reason for the persistence of the pain is in the mind/brain or subconscious. This creates or perpetuates the pain in order to distract attention from emotions that are too threatening for the individual to address consciously, such as anger, rage, grief or anxiety, hence the term ‘distraction pain syndrome’. We further suggest that a well controlled clinical trial, coupled with brain imaging studies, could corroborate or refute the promising results of the retrospective clinical studies we have conducted to date.

Keywords

Back Pain Fibromyalgia Chronic Lower Back Pain Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Integrative Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Bigos SJ, Deyo RA, Romanowski S. The new thinking on low-back pain. Patient Care 1995; 29: 140–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carragee EJ, Barcohana B, Alamin T, et al. Prospective controlled study of the development of lower back pain in previously asymptomatic subjects undergoing experimental discography. Spine 2004; 29(10): 1112–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(2): 69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J 1997; 6(2): 106–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borenstein DG, O’Mara Jr JW, Boden SD, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A(9): 1306–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarno J. Chronic back pain and psychic conflict. Scand J Rehabil Med 1976; 8: 143–53Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sarno J. Psychosomatic backache. J Fam Pract 1977; 5(3): 353–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, et al. Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995; 63(2): 225–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarno J. Healing back pain. New York: Warner Books, 1991: 61–3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wall P. Pain: the science of suffering. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000: 18–9Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Posner MI, Rothbart MK. Influencing brain networks: implications for education. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9(3): 99–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Solomon EP, Heide KM. The biology of trauma: implications for treatment. J Interpers Violence 2005; 20(1): 51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waddell G. Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine 1996; 21(24): 2820–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pruitt SD, Von Korff M. Improving the management of low back pain: a paradigm shift. In: Turk DC, Gatchel RJ, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioner’s guide. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press, 2002: 301–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    White III AA, Gordon SL. Synopsis: workshop on idiopathic low-back pain. Spine 1982; 7(2): 141–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Esdaile JM. Predictors of back pain in a general population cohort. Spine 2004; 29(1): 70–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarno JE. Mind over back pain. New York: Warner Books, 1984Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarno JE. Healing back pain: the mind-body connection. New York: Warner Books, 1991Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarno JE. The mind-body prescription: healing the body, healing the pain. New York: Warner Books, 1998Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carey TS, Garrett JM, Jackman AM. Beyond the good prognosis: examination of an inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2000; 25(1): 115–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schechter D, Smith AP. At home teaching materials for chronic pain. Pract Pain Manage 2004 May–Jun: 42–5Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schechter D, Smith AP. Long-term outcome of back pain treated by a psychologically-based program. American Psychosomatic Society 63rd Annual Meeting; 2005 March 2–5; Vancouver (BC) [abstract no. 1112; online]. Available from URL: http://www.psychosomatic.org/events/2005meetingabstracts.pdf [Accessed 2005 Mar 27]
  23. 23.
    The SF-12v2 health survey users manual. Lincoln (RI): QualityMetric Inc., 2002Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schechter D. The MindBody workbook. Los Angeles: MindBody Medicine Publications, 1999Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane RD, Quinlan DM, Schwartz GE, et al. The levels of emotional awareness scale: a cognitive-developmental measure of emotion. J Pers Assess 1990; 55(1–2): 124–34PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seligman Medical InstituteUniversity of Southern California Keck School of MedicineCulver CityUSA
  2. 2.Seligman Medical InstituteCulver City, Foothill RanchUSA

Personalised recommendations