Advertisement

Drugs & Therapy Perspectives

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 15–18 | Cite as

Matching the clinical subtype of pathological gambling with specific pharmacotherapies may be beneficial

Disease Management
  • 25 Downloads

Pathological gambling is an increasingly prevalent and highly disabling disorder. A range of pharmacological agents may be effective in treating the serotonergic and dopaminergic dysfunction that appears to be involved in its pathophysiology. A proposed theoretical classification of pathological gamblers into clinical subtypes may allow clinicians to match therapeutic strategies to the specific needs of patients.

An increasingly prevalent disorder

Over the last several decades, the availability of legal gambling facilities has expanded considerably. This has been accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of problem and pathological gambling.[1] Pathological gambling is characterized by a persistent urge to gamble despite its adverse consequences. It is a chronic, progressive, male-dominated disorder that affects approximately 1–3.4% of the US adult population.[1]

Typically, gambling dominates the patient’s life and can lead to financial loss, loss of employment and a breakdown of...

References

  1. 1.
    Iancu I, Lowengrub K, Dembinsky Y, et al. Pathological gambling: an update on neuropathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs 2008; 22(2): 123–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lader M. Antiparkinsonian medication and pathological gambling. CNS Drugs 2008; 22(5): 407–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reuter J, Raedler T, Rose M, et al. Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8(2): 147–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Potenza MN, Steinberg MA, Skudlarski P, et al. Gambling urges in pathological gambling: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60(8): 818–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bechara A. Neurobiology of decision-making: risk and reward. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry 2001; 6(3): 205–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brand M, Kalbe E, Labudda K, et al. Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res 2005; 133(1): 91–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kertzman S, Lowengrub K, Aizer A, et al. Stroop performance in pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Res 2006; 142(1): 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant JE, Williams KA, Kim SW. Update on pathological gambling. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2006; 8(1): 53–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollander E, DeCaria CM, Finkell JN, et al. A randomized double-blind fluvoxamine/placebo crossover trial in pathologic gambling. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47(9): 813–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim SW, Grant JE, Adson DE, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of paroxetine in the treatment of pathological gambling. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63(6): 501–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blanco C, Petkova E, Ibanez A, et al. A pilot placebo-controlled study of fluvoxamine for pathological gambling. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2002; 14(1): 9–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grant JE, Kim SW, Potenza MN, et al. Paroxetine treatment of pathological gambling: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2003; 18(4): 243–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saiz-Ruiz J, Blanco C, Ibanez A, et al. Sertraline treatment of pathological gambling: a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66(1): 28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim SW, Grant JE. An open naltrexone treatment study in pathological gambling disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 16(5): 285–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim SW, Grant JE, Adson DE, et al. Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49(11): 914–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grant JE, Potenza MN, Hollander E, et al. Multicenter investigation of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in the treatment of pathological gambling. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163(2): 303–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Black D. An open-label trial of bupropion in the treatment of pathological gambling. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004; 24(1): 108–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dannon PN, Lowengrub K, Musin E, et al. Sustained-release bupropion versus naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling: a preliminary blind-rater study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 25(6): 593–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dannon PN, Lowengrub K, Musin E, et al. Sustained release bupropion in the treatment of SSRI nonresponder pathological gamblers: pilot study and review of the literature. Therapy 2005; 2(5): 753–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pallanti S, Quercioli L, Sood E, et al. Lithium and valproate treatment of pathological gambling: a randomized single-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63(7): 559–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hollander E, Pallanti S, Allen A, et al. Does sustained-release lithium reduce impulsive gambling and affective instability in pathological gamblers with bipolar spectrum disorders? Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162(1): 137–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dannon PN, Lowengrub K, Gonopolski Y, et al. Topiramate versus fluvoxamine in the treatment of pathological gambling: a randomized, blind-rater comparison study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2005; 28(1): 6–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ravindran AV, Telner J, Bhatla R, et al. Pathological gambling: treatment correlates [abstract no. P.6.C.011]. Eur Neuropsycho-pharmacol 2006; 16Suppl. 4: S506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zimmerman M, Breen RB, Posternak MA. An open-label study of citalopram in the treatment of pathological gambling. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63(1): 44–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2008

Personalised recommendations