Skip to main content
Log in

SNM vs botulinum toxin A in OAB: cost effectiveness debated

  • News item
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCE

  1. Arlandis S, Castro D, Errando C, Fernández E, Jiménez M, González P, Crespo C, Stauble F, Rodríguez JM, Brosa M.Cost-effectiveness study of second line therapies in patients with idiopathic overactive bladder in Spain. 24th Annual Congress of the European Association of Urology: 136 abstr. 62, 18 Mar 2009

  2. Leong RK, Weil EHJ, Van Kerrebroeck PEV.Cost-effectiveness analysis of sacral neuromodulation and botuline toxin A treatment for patients with overactive bladder. 24th Annual Congress of the European Association of Urology: 242 abstr. 488, 19 Mar 2009

  3. Kessler TM, Khan S, Apostolidis A, Kalsi V, Panicker J, Roosen A, Elneil S, Fowler CJ, Dasgupta P.Sustained quality of life improvement after repeat intradetrusor injections of botulinum neurotoxin type a for refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity. 24th Annual Congress of the European Association of Urology: 137 abstr. 67, 18 Mar 2009

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SNM vs botulinum toxin A in OAB: cost effectiveness debated. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes News 578, 8 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/00151234-200905780-00016

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00151234-200905780-00016

Keywords

Navigation