Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of formulation on methylphenidate release patterns

Clinical implications

  • Review Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Drug Delivery

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common psychiatric disorder in children. Currently, the most widely prescribed therapy for ADHD is methylphenidate. Several formulations of methylphenidate have been developed that modify the delivery of the drug into the body. These include immediate-release (IR) tablets and modified-release preparations including sustained-release tablets, controlled-delivery capsules and tablets, and transdermal delivery systems. The IR tablet is taken two or three times daily and has been demonstrated to show efficacy through its rapid onset of action. The modified-release formulations deliver methylphenidate at a controlled rate and are administered once daily; they were developed to mimic the efficacy of the IR tablet by controlling drug release. The latest formulation development efforts have been directed towards combining the rapid release and onset of action of an IR component with an extended-release component that would maintain drug levels and allow for once-daily administration.

The rationale for the development of various delivery systems of methylphenidate stems from the need for drug coverage for at least 8 hours for ADHD patients. This would maintain efficacy over the entire school day and would eliminate the need for repeated administrations while the patient was at school. Early formulation development targeted a constant-release profile or an apparent zero-order input with the intention of maintaining plasma drug levels at a constant level for the required time period. However, it was demonstrated that the constant delivery of methylphenidate did not provide equivalent efficacy to the repeated administration of the IR product over the school day and resulted in tolerance to the effects of the drug. This suggested that sustained-release formulations that maintained constant drug levels over the treatment period would not result in the optimal therapeutic condition. In contrast, a drug delivery profile that maintained a drug release pattern with increase-release kinetics would be able to overcome the tolerance that was observed with the constant delivery formulations. Therefore, the formulation development for modified-release once-daily administration products of methylphenidate has been targeted to mimic the repeated administrations of IR methylphenidate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Wender PH, Wolf LE, Wasserstein J. Adults with ADHD: an overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001; 931: 1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Physicans’ Desk Reference®. 53rd ed. Montvale (NJ): Medical Economics Co, 1999: 2078–9

  3. Smucker WD, Hedayat M. Evaluation and treatment of ADHD. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64: 817–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein MA, Blondis TA, Schnitzler ER, et al. Methylphenidate dosing: twice daily versus three times daily. Pediatrics 1996; 98(4): 748–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick KS, Straughn AB, Jarvis EJ, et al. The absorption of sustained-release methylphenidate formulations compared to an immediate release formulation. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1989; 10: 165–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Solanto MV, Conner CK. A dose-response and time-action analysis of autonomic and behavioral effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Psychophysiology 1982; 19: 658–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swanson J, Gupta S, Lam A, et al. Development of a new once-a-day formulation of methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60: 204–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson JM, Kinsbourne M, Roberts W, et al. Time-response analysis of the effect of stimulant medication on the learning ability of children referred for hyperactivity. Pediatrics 1978; 61: 21–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivas NR, Hubbard JW, Quinn D, et al. Enantioselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dl-threo-methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52: 561–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Srinivas NR, Hubbard JW, Korchinski ED, et al. Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of dl-threo-methylphenidate in humans. Pharm Res 1993; 10: 14–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Modi NB, Lindemulder B, Gupta SK. Single and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of an oral once-a-day osmotic controlled-release OROS® (methylphenidate HC1) formulation. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 379–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez MA, Pentikis HS, Anderl N, et al. Methylphenidate bioavailability from two extended-release formulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 40: 175–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pentikis H, Simmons RD, Benedict M, et al. Methylphenidate bioavailability in adults following an extended-release multiparticulate formulation administered sprinkled or as an intact capsule. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41(4): 443–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Modi NB, Wang B, Hu WT, et al. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of osmotic controlled-release methylphenidate HC1 in healthy subjects. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2000; 21: 23–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Modi NB, Wang B, Noveck RJ, et al. Dose-proportional and stereospecificc pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate delivered using an osmotic, controlled-release oral delivery system. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40: 1141–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer MC, Straugh AB, Jarvi EJ, et al. Bioequivalence of methylphendiate immediate-release tablets using a replicated study design to characterize in-trasubject variability. Pharm Res 2000; 17: 381–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dzerk AM, Briscoe CJ, Wheling MR, et al. Stereoselective determinations of methylphenidate and ritalinic acid in human plasma by a sensitive LC/MS/MS method to support pharmacokinetic studies [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists; 1999 Nov 14–18; New Orleans. Arlington (VA): American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 1999

  18. Roland M, Tozer TN. Clinical pharmacokinetics: concepts and applications. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swanson JM, Gupta S, Guinta D, et al. Acute tolerance to methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999; 66: 295–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Swanson JM, Gupta S, Williams L, et al. Efficacy of a new pattern of delivery of methylphenidate for the treatment of ADHD: effects on activity level in the classroom and on the playground. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41: 1306–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ritalin® [prescribing information]. East Hanover (NJ): Novartis, 2003

  22. Wargin W, Patrick K, Kilts C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in man, rat, and monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1983; 226: 382–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hungund BL, Perel JM, Hurwic MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in hyperkinetic children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 8: 571–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Elia J, Ambrosini PL, Rapoport JL. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 780–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hubbard JW, Srinivas NR, Quinn D, et al. Enantioselective aspects of the disposition of dl-threo-methylphenidate after the administration of a sustained-release formulation to children with attention deficity-hyperactivity disorder. J Pharm Sci 1989; 78(11): 944–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Birmaher B, Greenhill LL, Cooper TB, et al. Sustained release methylphenidate: pharmacokinetic studies in ADDH males. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989; 28(5): 768–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelham WE, Sturges J, Hoza J, et al. Sustained-release and standard methylphenidate effects on cognitive and social behavior in children with attention deficit disorder. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 491–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown GL, Ebert MH, Mikkelson EJ, et al. Behavior and motor activity response in hyperactive children and plasma amphetamine levels following a sustained release preparation. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1980; 19: 225–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gualtieri CT, Wargin W, Kanoy R, et al. Clinical studies of methylphenidate serum levels in children and adults. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1982; 21: 19–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gualtieri CT, Hicks RE, Patrick K, et al. Clinical correlates of methylphenidate blood levels. Ther Drug Monit 1984; 6: 379–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Patrick KS, Mueller RA, Gualtieri CT, et al. Pharmacokinetics and actions of methylphenidate. In: Meltzer HY, editor. Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. New York: Raven Press, 1987: 1387–95

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nies AS, Spielberg SP. Principle of therapeutics. In: Hardman JG, Gilman AG, Limbird LE, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York: McGraw Hill, 1996: 43–75

    Google Scholar 

  33. Concerta® [prescribing information]. Mountain View (CA): Alza Corporation, 2000

  34. Markowitz JS, Straugh AB, Patrick KS, et al. Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42(4): 393–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Keating GM, McClellan K, Jarvis B. Methylphenidate (OROS® Formulations). CNS Drugs 2001; 15(6): 495–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Swanson JM, Lerner M, Wigal T, et al. The use of a laboratory school protocol to evaluate concepts about efficacy and side effects of new formulations of stimulant medications. J Atten Disord 2002; 6Suppl. 1: S73–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Swanson J, Greenhill L, Pelham W, et al. Initiating Concerta (OROS® methylphenidate HC1) qd in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Res 2000; 3: 59–76

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wolraich ML, Greenhill LL, Pelham W, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of Oros® methylphenidate once a day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2001; 108(4): 883–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bierderman J, Quinn D, Wigal S, et al. Methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release capsules: once-daily therapy for ADHD [abstract no. NR334]. Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2002 May 18–23; Philadelphia. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association, 2002

  40. Biederman J, Quinn D, Weiss M, et al. Methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release capsules (Ritalin LA®): a new once-daily therapy for ADHD [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2002 May 18–23; Philadelphia. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association, 2002

  41. Gonzalez MA, Pentikis HS, Campbell DA, et al. Methylphenidate steady-state pharmacokinetics with a once-daily transdermal system [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists; 2002 Nov 8–14; Toronto. Arlington (VA): Americal Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2002

  42. Volkow ND, Swanson JM. Variables that affect the clinical use and abuse of methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 1909–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh P, Boniello S, Liu P, et al. Transdermal iontophoretic delivery of methylphenidate HC1 in vitro. Int J Pharm 1999; 178: 121–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kupietz SS, Winsberg BG, Sverd J. Learning ability and methylphenidate (Ritalin®) plasma concentrations in hyperkinetic children: a preliminary investigation. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1982; 21: 27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Winsberg BG, Kupietz SS, Sverd J, et al. Methylphenidate oral dose plasma concentrations and behavioral response in children. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1982; 76: 329–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Shaywitz SE, Hunt RD, Jatlow P, et al. Psychopharmacology of attention deficit disorder: pharmacokinetics, neuroendocrine, and behavioral measures following acute and chronic treatment with methylphenidate. Pediatrics 1982; 69: 688–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Swanson JM, McBurnett K, Christian P, et al. Stimulant medications and the treatment of children with ADHD. In: Ollendick TH, Prinz RJ, editors. Advances in clinical child psychology. New York: Plenum Press, 1995: 265–322

    Google Scholar 

  48. Swanson JM, Volkow N. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of methylphenidate in humans. In: Solanto MV, Arnstep AFT, Castellanos FX, editors. Stimulant drugs and ADHD: basic and clinical neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001: 259–82

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chan YM, Swanson JM, Soldin SS, et al. Methylphenidate hydrochloride given with or without breakfast: II. Effects on plasma concentration of methylphenidate and ritalinic acid. Pediatrics 1983; 72(1): 56–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chan YM, Soldin SJ, Swanson JM, et al. Gas chromatographic/mass spectroscopic analysis of methylphenidate (Ritalin®) in serum. Clin Biochem 1980; 13: 266–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Perel JM, Greenhill LL, Currant S, et al. Correlates of pharmacokinetics and attentional measures in methylphenidate treated hyperactive children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 29: 160–1

    Google Scholar 

  52. Swanson JM, Lerner M, Cantwell DP. Blood levels and tolerance to stimulants in ADDH children. Clin Neuropharmacol 1986; 9: 523–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pelham WE, Greenslade KE, Vodde-Hamilton M, et al. Relative efficacy of long-acting stimulants on children with attention deficit disorder: a comparison of standard methylphenidate, sustained-release methylphenidate, sustained-release dextroamphetamine, and pemoline. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 226–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fitzpatrick PA, Klorman R, Brumaghim JT, et al. Effects of sustained-release and standard preparations of methylphenidate in attention deficit disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992; 31: 226–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dulcan MK. Using psychostimulants to treat behavioral disorders of children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 1990; 1: 7–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank John Pentikis and Linda Gonzalez for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen S. Pentikis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pentikis, H.S., González, M.A. Effect of formulation on methylphenidate release patterns. Am J Drug Deliv 3, 47–54 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00137696-200503010-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00137696-200503010-00005

Keywords

Navigation