Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of Urticaria

An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Antihistamines

  • Review Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urticaria is a cutaneous syndrome characterized by dermal edema (wheal) and erythema (flare) that blanches with pressure. The lesions typically last less than 24 hours and are usually pruritic. In 1983, Christensen and Maibach summarized the theory behind the use of histamine H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) in clinical dermatology. These agents remain the mainstay of treatment for urticaria.

This article reviews the medical literature on the effectiveness of antihistamines in urticarial syndromes, including acute, chronic idiopathic and the physical urticarias.

Older antihistamines, such as chlorpheniramine and hydroxyzine, are effective in the treatment of urticarias, but they also have marked sedative and anticholinergic effects. Newer nonsedating antihistamines (second-generation antihistamines) have been developed that have reduced adverse effects because they do not cross the blood-brain barrier; these agents (acrivastine, cetirizine, loratadine, mizolastine, fexofenadine, ebastine, azelastine and epinastine) cause significantly less sedation and psychomotor impairment than their older counterparts.

A review of the literature reveals that there are few studies which document the efficacy of second-generation antihistamines in the treatment of acute urticaria, a biologic entity that usually resolves within 3 weeks. We did not identify controlled studies that suggested superiority of any antihistamine in the treatment of acute urticaria. Loratadine or cetirizine, and possibly mizolastine, appear to be treatments of choice for chronic idiopathic urticaria. For symptomatic dermatographism, the combination of an antihistamine and an H2 antagonist, e.g. chlorpheniramine and cimetidine, appears to be effective. Very few studies have been conducted on the use of antihistamines in the treatment of cold, cholinergic, and pressure urticaria.

Antihistamines are the mainstay of urticarial therapy. This evidence-based review suggests that there are efficacy differences between newer, nonsedating antihistamines and older agents in some forms of the disorder. Clearly, further well-controlled clinical trials in larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify the role of these agents in the treatment of urticaria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaughn M.P., DeWalt A.C., Diaz J.D. Urticaria associated with systemic disease and psychological factors. In: Charlesworth E.N., editor. Immunology and allergy clinics of North America: Urticaria Vol 15:4 Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1995; 725–743

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews K.P. Chronic urticaria. In: Schocket A.L., editor. Clinical management of urticaria and anaphylaxis, New York: Marcel Dekker 1993; 21–68

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stedmans’s Medical Dictionary. 27th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2000: 1918

  4. Christensen O.B., Maibach H.I. Antihistamines in dermatology. Semin Dermatol 1983; 2: 270–280

    Google Scholar 

  5. Timmerman H. Factors involved in the absence of sedative effects by the secondgeneration antihistamines. Allergy 2000; 55: 5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slater J.W., Zechnich A.D., Haxby D.G. Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review. Drugs 1999 Jan; 57 (1): 31–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ormerod A.D. Urticaria: recognition, causes and treatment. Drugs 1994; 48: 717–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Phanuphak P., Schocket A.L., Arroyave C.M., et al. Skin histamine in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1980; 65: 371–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simons F.E., McMillan J.L., Simons K.J. A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, terfenadine, loratadine, astemizole, and chlorpheniramine versus placebo: suppressive effects on histamine-induced wheals and flares during 24 hours in normal subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 540–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant J.A., Danielson L., Rihoux J.P., et al. A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine, epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24h in healthy male subjects. Allergy 1999; 54 (7): 700–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayramgurler D., Bilen N., Apaydyn R., et al. Effects of acrivastine, loratadine, and cetirizine on histamine-induced wheal and flare responses. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999; 24: 407–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuberbier T., Munzberger C., Haustein U., et al. Double-blind, crossover study of high-dose cetirizine in cholinergic urticaria. Dermatology 1996; 193 (4): 324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zuberbier T., Aberer W., Burtin B., et al. Efficacy of cetirizine in cholinergic urticaria. Acta Derm Venereol 1995; 75 (2): 147–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fauci A.S., Haynes B.F., Katz P. The spectrum of vasculitis clinical, pathological, immunologic and therapeutic considerations. Ann Int Med 1978; 89: 660–676

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuberbier T., Ifflander J., Semmler C., et al. Acute urticaria: clinical aspects and therapeutic responsiveness. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1996; 76: 295–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ring K., Behrendt H. H1- and H2-antagonists in allergic and pseudoallergic diseases. Clin Exper Allergy 1990; 20 Suppl. 2: 43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moscati R.M., Moore G.P. Comparison of cimetidine and diphenhydramine in the treatment of acute urticaria. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19 (1): 12–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bleehen S.S., Thomas S.E., Greaves M.W.,et al. Cimetidine and chlorpheniramine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a multi-centre randomised double-blind study. Br J Dermatol 1987; 117 (1): 81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boggs P.B., Ellis C.N., Grossman J., et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of terfenadine and hydroxyzine in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Allergy 1989; 63: 616–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Grant J.A., Bernstein D.I., Buckley C.E., et al. Double-blind comparison of terfenadine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988; 81: 574–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalis B. Double-blind multicentre comparative study of ebastine, terfenadine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria in adults. Drugs 1996; 52 Suppl. 1: 30–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paul E., Bodeker R.H. Treatment of chronic urticaria with terfenadine and ranitidine: a randomised double-blind study in 45 patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 31: 277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ring J., Brockow K., Ollert M., et al. Antihistamines in urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy 1999; 29 Suppl. 1: 31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenzweig P., Caplain H., Chaufour S., et al. Comparative wheal and flare study of mizolastine vs terfenadine, cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 40 (5): 459–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubertret L., Murrieta Aguttes M., Tonet J. Efficacy and safety of mizolastine 10mg in a placebo-controlled comparison with loratadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria: results of the MILOR Study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 12 (1): 16–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Breneman D.L. Cetirizine versus hydroxyzine and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Pharmacother 1996; 30 (10): 1075–1079

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalivas J., Breneman D., Tharp M., et al. Urticaria: clinical efficacy of cetirizine in comparison with hydroxyzine and placebo. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990; 86: 1014–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Monroe E.W. Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria and atopic dermatitis. Clin Ther 1992; 14 (1): 17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Monroe E.W., Berstein D.I., Fox R.W., et al. Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria. Arzneimittelforschung 1992; 42 (9): 1119–1121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Greene S.L., Reed C.E., Schroeter A.L. Double-blind crossover study comparing doxepin with diphenhydramine for the treatment of chronic urticaria. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 12 (4): 669–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Boyle J., Marks P., Gibson J.R. Acrivastine versus terfenadine in the treatment of symptomatic dermatographism — a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Int Med Res 1989; 17 Suppl. 2: 9B–13B

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Breneman D., Bronsky E.A., Bruce S., et al. Cetirizine and astemizole therapy for chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 192–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Paul E., Bodeker R.H. Comparative study of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. A randomised double-blind study of 40 patients. Ann Allergy 1989; 62 (4): 318–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ormerod A.D., Baker R., Watt J., et al. Terfenadine and brompheniramine maleate in urticaria and dermatographism. Dermatologica 1986; 173 (1): 5–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cainelli T., Seidenari S., Valsecchi R., et al. Double-blind comparison of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Pharmatherapeutica 1986; 4 (10): 679–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kietzmann H., Macher E., Rihoux J.P., et al. Comparison of cetirizine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Allergy 1990; 65: 498–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abu Shareeah, A.M. Comparative efficacy of loratadine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Int J Dermatol 1992; 31 (5): 355–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Alomar A., De La Cuadra, Fernandez J. Cetirizine vs astemizole in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Int Med Res 1990; 18 (5): 358–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Belaich S., Bruttmann G., DeGreef H., et al. Comparative effects of loratadine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Allergy 1990; 64: 191–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Leyh F., Harvey S.G., Gibson J.R., et al. A comparison of acrivastine versus clemastine and placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Int Med Res 1989; 17 Suppl. 2: 22B–24B

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Salo O.P., Harvey S.G., Calthrop J.G., et al. A comparison of acrivastine versus hydroxyzine and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Int Med Res 1989; 17 Suppl. 2: 18B–2 lB

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Juhlin L., Gibson J.R., Harvey S.G., et al. Acrivastine versus clemastine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. A double-blind, placebo controlled study. Int J Dermatol 1987; 26 (10): 653–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Neittaanmaki H., Fraki J.E., Gibson J.R. Comparison of the new antihistamine acrivastine (BW 825C) versus cyproheptadine in the treatment of idiopathic cold urticaria. Dermatologica 1988; l77 (2): 98–l03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Neittaanmaki H., Myohanen T., Fraki J.E. Comparison of cinnarizine, cyproheptadine, doxepin, and hydroxyzine in treatment of idiopathic cold urticaria: usefulness of doxepin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 11 (3): 483–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kobza Black A., Aboobaker J., Gibson J.R., et al. Acrivastine versus hydroxyzine in the treatment of cholinergic urticaria. A placebo-controlled study. Acta Derm Venereol 1988; 68 (6): 541–544

    Google Scholar 

  46. Michell P., Hawk J.L.M., Shafrir A., et al. Assessing the treatment of solar urticaria. Dermatologica 1980; 160: 198–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Monfrecola G., Masturzo E., Riccardo A.M., et al. Cetirizine for solar urticaria in the visible spectrum. Dermatology 2000; 200: 334–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bilsland D., Ferguson J. A comparison of cetirizine and terfenadine in the management of solar urticaria. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1991; 8 (2): 62–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Dawe R.S., Ferguson J. Prolonged benefit following ultraviolet A phototherapy for solar urticaria. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137 (1): 144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Collins P., Ahamat R., Green C., et al. Plasma exchange therapy for solar urticaria. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134: (6) 1093–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Breathnach S.M., Allen R., Ward A.M., et al. Symptomatic dermatographism: Natural history, clinical features, laboratory investigations and response to therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 1983; 8 (5): 463–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaur S., Greaves M.W., Eftekhari N. Factitious urticaria (dermatographism): treatment by cimetidine and chlorpheniramine in a randomised double-blind study. Br J Dermatol 1981; 104: 185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Matthews C.N., Boss J.M., Warm R.P., et al. The effect of H1 and H2 histamine antagonists on symptomatic dermatographism. Br J Dermatol 1979; 101: 57–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wanderer A.A., Ellis E.F.: Treatment of cold urticaria with cyproheptadine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1971; 48: 366–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wanderer A.A., St. Pierre J.P., Ellis E.F. Primary acquired cold urticaria. Double blind comparative study of treatment with cyproheptadine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo. Arch Dermatol 1977; 113 (10): 1375–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sigler R.W., Evans R., Horakova Z., et al. The role of cyproheptadine in the treatment of cold urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1980; 65: 309–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. McDonald C.J. Cholinergic and cold urticarias. Postgrad Med 1982; 71: 216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Dubertret L., Leynadier F., Murrieta-Aguttes M. Effect of mizolastine (M) vs placebo in acquired cold induced urticaria (ACIU): the cold stimulation time test (CSTT). Allergy 1996; 51 Suppl. 31: 67

    Google Scholar 

  59. Simons F.E.R. Antihistamines. In: Middleton E., Ellis E.F., Yunginger J.W., et al., editors. Allergy: principle and practice. 5th ed. St Louis (MO): Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1998: 613

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, University of California School of Medicine, 90 Medical Center Way, Surge Building, Room 110, San Francisco, California, 94143, USA

    Ernest E. Lee & Howard I. Maibach

Authors
  1. Ernest E. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Howard I. Maibach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, E.E., Maibach, H.I. Treatment of Urticaria. Am J Clin Dermatol 2, 27–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102010-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102010-00005

Keywords

Search

Navigation