Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Difficulties in the Production of Identical Drug Products from a Pharmaceutical Technology Viewpoint

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drugs in R & D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generic products reduce healthcare expenditure and create market competition, and it is broadly assumed that these drugs are identical to the original branded reference drug product. In practice, despite legislation demanding demonstration of pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence, thereby ensuring the safety and efficacy of the product, generic products can differ significantly from the reference drug and amongst themselves, particularly in terms of pharmacokinetic properties. These differences most often relate to pharmaceutical technical differences in production of the active principle ingredient (e.g. different crystalline forms or particle size), to use of excipients (such as sugars) or to the manufacturing process itself (such as tablet manufacture). Furthermore, from the patient’ss perspective, changing from branded to generic drugs can give rise to concerns about switching. Although sufficient safeguards exist to ensure patient safety and generic drug efficacy, it should not be assumed that all generics are entirely identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Prašnikar J, Škerlj T. New product development process and time-to-market in the generic pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Manage 2006; 35: 690–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. EMEA. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products: note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence. London: 26 July 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/140198en.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 21]

    Google Scholar 

  3. US FDA. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: bioavailability and bioequiva-lence studies for orally administered drug products — general considerations. Rockville (MD): March 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston A, Belitsky P, Frei U, et al. Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 60: 389–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bialer M. Generic products of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): is it an issue? Epilepsia 2007; 48: 1825–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reiffel JA, Kowey PR. Generic antiarrhythmics are not therapeutically equivalent for the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1151–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Generic Medicines Association. Quality, safety and efficacy [online]. Available from URL: http://www.egagener-ics.com/gen-quality.htm [Accessed 2008 Jan 21]

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Vos D, Guelen PJ, Stevenson D. The bioavailability of Tamoplex (tamoxifen): Part 4. A parallel study comparing Tamoplex and four batches of Nolvadex in healthy male volunteers. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1989; 11 (10): 647–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. EMEA. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products: note for guidance on development pharmaceutics. CPMP/QWP/155/ 96. London: January 1998 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/qwp/015596en.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 21]

    Google Scholar 

  10. EMEA. European Medicines Agency. ICH Topic Q6A: specifications. Test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new drug products: chemical substances. London: 1999 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/056398en.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 21]

    Google Scholar 

  11. US FDA. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: Q8 — pharmaceutical development. Rockville (MD): 2006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graffner C. Regulatory aspects of drug dissolution from a European perspective. Eur J Pharm Sci 2006; 29 (3–4): 288–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trezza C, Galli AD. An investigation of the quality and performance of ramipril generics versus Tritace. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2007; 101 Suppl. 1: 103

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JT, Shiu GK, Worsley W, et al. Effects of humidity and temperature on in vitro performance of carbamazepine tablets. Pharm Res 1990; 9: S143

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bagirova VL, Kovaleva EL, Shanazarov KS. Structure of chemical compounds, methods of analysis and process control: current problems of drug expertise and standardization. Pharm Chemistry J 2005; 39: 333–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kovaleski J, Kraut B, Mattiuz A, et al. Impurities in generic pharmaceutical development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007; 59 (1): 56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasenack N, Muller BW. Ibuprofen crystals with optimized properties. Int J Pharm 2002; 245 (1–2): 9–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Byrn SR, Pfeiffer RR, Stowell JG. Solid state chemistry of drugs. 2nd ed. West Lafayette (IN): SSCI Inc., 1999

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amidon GL, Lennernas H, Shah VP, et al. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm Res 1995; 12 (3): 413–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hickey MB, Peterson ML, Scoppettuolo LA, et al. Performance comparison of a co-crystal of carbamazepine with marketed product. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007; 67 (1): 112–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Borka L, Haleblian JK. Crystal polymorphism of pharmaceuticals. Acta Pharm Jugosl 1991; 40: 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  22. Giron D. Thermal analysis and calorimetric methods in the characterization of polymorphs and solvates. Thermochim Acta 1995; 248: 1–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haleblian JK. Characterization of habits and crystalline modification of solids and their pharmaceutical applications. J Pharm Sci 1975; 64 (8): 1269–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vippagunta SR, Brittain HG, Grant DJ. Crystalline solids. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 48 (1): 3–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lippold BC, Ohm A. Correlation between wettability and dissolution rate of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm 1986; 28: 67–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Snider DA, Addicks W, Owens W. Polymorphism in generic drug product development. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004; 56 (3): 391–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu LX, Furness MS, Raw A, et al. Scientific considerations of pharmaceutical solid polymorphism in abbreviated new drug applications. Pharm Res 2003; 20 (4): 531–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chemburkar SR, Bauer J, Deming K, et al. Dealing with the impact of ritonavir polymorphs on the late stages of bulk drug process development. J Org Process Res Dev 2000; 4: 413–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simoes S, Sousa A, Figueiredo M. Dissolution rate studies of pharmaceutical multisized powders: a practical approach using the Coulter method. Int J Pharm 1996; 127 (2): 283–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tinke AP, Vanhoutte K, De Maesschalck R, et al. A new approach in the prediction of the dissolution behavior of suspended particles by means of their particle size distribution. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2005; 39 (5): 900–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowker MJ. A procedure for salt selection and optimisation. Winheim: Wiley-VCH, 2002: 161–89

    Google Scholar 

  32. US FDA. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Pharmaceutical Science Office of Generic Drugs. Electronic Orange Book: approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. Rockville (MD): 2007

    Google Scholar 

  33. Amlodipine citizen petition [online]. Available from URL: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dailys/03/Sept03/090303/03p-0408-cp00001-08-Tab-G-vol3.pdf [Accessed 2008 Jan 10]

  34. Verbeeck RK, Kanfer I, Walker RB. Generic substitution: the use of medicinal products containing different salts and implications for safety and efficacy. Eur J Pharm Sci 2006; 28 (1–2): 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vandecruys R, Peeters J, Verreck G, et al. Use of a screening method to determine excipients which optimize the extent and stability of supersaturated drug solutions and application of this system to solid formulation design. Int J Pharm 2007; 342: 168–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Crowley PJ, Excipients as stabilizers. Pharm Sci Technol Today 1999; 2: 237–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Adkin DA, Davis SS, Sparrow RA, et al. The effects of pharmaceutical excipients on small intestinal transit. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39 (4): 381–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen ML, Straughn AB, Sadrieh N, et al. A modern view of excipient effects on bioequivalence: case study of sorbitol. Pharm Res 2007; 24 (1): 73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Alt A, Potthast H, Moessinger J, et al. Biopharmaceutical characterization of sotalol-containing oral immediate release drug products. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004; 58 (1): 145–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalantzi L, Reppas C, Dressman JB, et al. Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: acetaminophen (paracetamol). J Pharm Sci 2006; 95 (1): 4–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Albonico M, Mathema P, Montresor A, et al. Comparative study of the quality and efficacy of originator and generic albendazole for mass treatment of soil-transmitted nematode infections in Nepal. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007; 101 (5): 454–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Solvang S, Finholt P. Effect of tablet processing and formulation factors on dissolution rate of the active ingredient in human gastric juice. J Pharm Sci 1970; 59 (1): 49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Medical writing assistance was provided by Wolters Kluwer Health Medical Communications; this assistance was funded by sanofi-aventis. The authors are consultants to a number of pharmaceutical companies on issues unrelated to those presented in this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando A. Genazzani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Genazzani, A.A., Pattarino, F. Difficulties in the Production of Identical Drug Products from a Pharmaceutical Technology Viewpoint. Drugs R&D 9, 65–72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200809020-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200809020-00001

Keywords

Navigation