References
Nabholtz JM, Senn HJ, Bezwoda WR, et al. Prospective ran- domized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1413–24
Sjostrom J, Blomqvist C, Mouridsen H, et al. Docetaxel compared with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a randomised phase III study with crossover on progression by the Scandinavian Breast Group. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 1194–201
Nabholtz JM, Pienkowski T, Mackey JPM, et al. Phase III trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) with FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive breast cancer (BC) patients: interim analysis of the BCIRG 001 study [abstract no. 141]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 36a
Bonneterre J, Roche H, Monnier A, et al. Docetaxel vs 5-fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline therapy failure. Br J Cancer 2002; 87: 1210–5
O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2812–23
Alba E, Martin M, Ramos M, et al. Multicenter randomized trial comparing sequential with concomitant administration of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEI CAM-9903) phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2587–93
Bonneterre J, Dieras V, Tubiana-Hulin M, et al. Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in meta-static breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 91 (8): 1466–71
Mackey J, Paterson A, Dirix LY, et al. Final Results of the Phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide to FAC as first line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract no. 137]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 35a
Nabholtz JM, Paterson A, Dirix J, et al. A phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide to FAC as first line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract no. 83]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001; 20: 22a
Nabholtz JM, Falkson C, Campos D, et al. Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 968–75
Jassem J, Pienkowski T, Pluzanska A, et al. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1707–15
Biganzoli L, Cufer T, Bruning P, et al. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3114–21
Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 1431–9
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer. 1981; 47: 207–14.
Sparano JA, O’Neill A, Schaefer PL, et al. Phase II trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1196. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2369–77
von Minckwitz G, Costa SD, Raab G, et al. Dose-dense doxorubicin, docetaxel, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support with or without tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast: a randomized, controlled, open phase IIb study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3506–15
Misset JL, Dieras V, Gruia G, et al. Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 553–60
Schwartz J, Domchek SM, Hwang WT, et al. Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard o dosedense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2005; 16 (2): 247–52
Jackisch C, von Minckwitz G, Eidtmann H, et al. Dose-dense biweekly doxorubicin/docetaxel versus sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/docetaxel in operable breast cancer: second interim analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 3: 276–80
Acknowledgements
Funding for this study was provided by Sanofi-Aventis and Immunex. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montero, A., Booser, D., Esparza-Guerra, L. et al. Phase I Trial of Dose-Dense Docetaxel and Doxorubicin with or without Sargramostim in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. Drugs R D 6, 299–305 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200506050-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00126839-200506050-00006