Summary
It is now generally accepted that sound evidence should underpin all decision making in health care. However, while research findings are necessary, they are rarely sufficient themselves in providing conclusive answers. This shortfall means that in order for clinical and policy decisions to be considered credible and valid, the process of reaching a conclusion has also to be transparent, consultative, inclusive and developmental. Successful implementation of evidence-based medicine on a daily basis requires a scientific approach moderated according to humanistic criteria. Using the initial experiences of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), this paper describes the challenges faced by an organization undertaking this approach on a day-to-day basis. The principles underpinning this approach are in sympathy with a new emerging ethos of health care and hence provide a secure base for the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1Annual Lecture of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine 2001. Delivered at the Royal College of Physicians in London on 1 November 2001.
References
Department of Health. The new NHS: modern and dependable. London: HMSO, 1997.
Department of Health. A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: HMSO, 1998.
Hammond KR. Human judgement and social policy: irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error and unavoidable injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Horton R. Screening mammography — an overview revisited. Lancet 2001; 358:1284–1285.
News review. BMJ 2001; 11:26.
Mechanic D. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36:95–102.
Littlejohns P. The relationship between NICE and the national R&D programme. In: Baker M, Kirk S eds. Research and development for the NHS, 3rd edn. Oxford: Radcliffe Press, 2001.
Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies. The need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355:103–106.
Smith R. The failings of NICE. BMJ 2000; 321:1363–1364.
The Times, November 2000.
Cookson R, McDaid D, Maynard A. Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources? BMJ 2001; 323:743–745.
The report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1998–1995. Learning form Bristol. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health. Command of Her Majesty. July 2001
www.inahta.org
The AGREE Collaborative Group. Guideline development in Europe: an international comparison. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000; 16:1039–1049.
Ierodiakonou K, Vandenbrouke JP. Medicine as a stochastic art. Lancet 1993; 341:542–543.
Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment (Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring vol 1). Ann Arbor, Michigan Health Administration, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Annual Lecture of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine 2001. Delivered at the Royal College of Physicians in London on 1 November 2001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Littlejohns, P. Evidence-based medicine: NICE hints on day-to-day implementation. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine 15, 281–286 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00124363-200112000-00007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00124363-200112000-00007