Abstract
Corporations have engaged in sponsorship of health management programs and, more recently, disease management programs to facilitate healthy and productive work environments. The purpose of this review is to examine the health and financial outcomes from these corporate-sponsored disease management programs. This article focuses on seven diseases or chronic conditions (arthritis, asthma, cancer, depression, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and migraine) that potentially impact employee productivity (both in time away from work and in loss of effectiveness at work) and health status including medical and pharmaceutical utilization and costs.
Corporate-sponsored disease management programs typically focus on education and screening for selected diseases or chronic conditions. Partnerships have been formed with health plans and third-party program providers to reach employees with interventions and treatment. The typical outcome measures from these programs have primarily been clinical indicators and medical utilization. Measures of productivity need to be incorporated as important outcome measures for disease management programs.
The estimated financial opportunity for the corporation is a reflection of the cost differential for a given disease and the prevalence of that disease within the employee population. Primary diseases, chronic conditions, and health risks contribute to increased medical utilization and decreased productivity within the corporation. Promoting programs that focus on the whole person, including health risks, chronic conditions, and diseases, will likely increase the possibility of success in helping the employee to better self-manage their health conditions and consequently provide gains for both the individual and the corporation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom DE, Canning D. The health and wealth of nations. Science 2000; 287: 1207–9
Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: 1995–1998 update. Am J Health Promot 1999; 13: 333–45
Heaney CA, Goetzel RZ. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot 1997; 11: 290–307
Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 2001; 15: 296–320
Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, et al. The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41: 863–77
Musich SA, Napier D, Edington DW. The association of health risks with workers’ compensation costs. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43: 534–41
Schultz AB, Lu CF, Barnett TR, et al. Influence of participation in a worksite health promotion program on disability days. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 776–80
Edington DW, Yen L, Witting P. The financial impact of changes in personal health practices. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39: 1037–46
Lerner D, Reed JI, Massarotti E, et al. The work limitations questionnaire’s validity and reliability among patients with Osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 197–208
Edington DW. Emerging research: a view from one research center. Am J Health Promot 2001; 15: 341–9
Lerner D, Amick BC, Lee JC, et al. Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 2003; 42: 649–59
Musich SA, Burton WN, Edington DW. Costs and benefits of prevention and disease management. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 1999; 5: 153–66
Riedel JE, Lynch W, Baase C, et al. The effect of disease prevention and health promotion on workplace productivity: a literature review. Am J Health Promot 2001; 15: 167–91
Kessler RC, Greenberg PE, Mickelson KD, et al. The effects of chronic medical conditions on work loss and work cutback. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43: 218–25
Wright DW, Beard MJ, Edington DW. The association of health risks with the cost of time away from work. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 1126–34
Edington DW, Burton WN. Health and productivity. In: McCunney RJ, editor. A practical approach to occupational and environmental medicine. 3rd ed. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Company, 2003: 140–52
Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ. Disease management as a part of total health and productivity management. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2000; 8: 121–8
Musich SA, Hirschland D, McDonald T, et al. Excess healthcare costs associated with excess health risks in disease and non-diseased health risk appraisal participants. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2002; 10: 251–8
Hook D, Musich SA, Edington DW. Excess healthcare costs associated with excess health risks among diseased and non-diseased health risk appraisal participants in an Australian health plan. Healthcover 2002; 18: 57–65
O’Connell JM, Kauffman LD. A framework for disease management ROI studies: a health-plan perspective. Dis Manag 2002; 5: 109–21
Nash DB. Disease management: what does the research evidence show? Drug Benefit Trends 2002; 14: 18–24
Burton WN, Morrison A, Wertheimer AI. Pharmaceuticals and worker productivity loss: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45: 610–21
Amick BC, Lerner MS, Rogers WH, et al. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3152–60
Lawrence RC, Heimick CG, Arnett FC, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorder in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 778–99
Muchmore L, Lynch WD, Gardner HH, et al. Prevalence of arthritis and associated joint disorders in an employed population and the associated healthcare, sick leave, disability, and workers’ compensation benefits cost and productivity loss for employers. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45: 369–78
Hootman JM, Sniezek JE, Heimick CG. Women and arthritis: burden, impact and prevention programs. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002, 416
Birnbaum HG, Aarton M, Greenberg PE, et al. Direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis to an employer. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 588–96
Young A, Dixey J, Kulinsksya E, et al. Which patients stop working because of rheumatoid arthritis: results of five years’ follow up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS). Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 335–40
Shanahan EM, Smith MD. Rheumatoid arthritis, disability and the workplace. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1999; 13: 675–88
Rasch EK, Hirsch R, Paulose-Ram R, et al. Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in persons 60 years of age and older in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 917–26
Barbour JA, Ginding J, Bridges M, et al. Evaluation of a screening tool for inflammatory joint disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 187–8
LaValley M, McAlindon TE, Evans S, et al. Problems in the development and validation of questionnaire-based screening instruments for ascertaining cases with symptomatic knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 1105–13
Saraux A, Berthelot JM, Chales G, et al. Value of laboratory tests in early prediction of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 155–65
Visser H, le Cessie S, Vos K, et al. How to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis early: a predictive model for persistent (erosive) arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 357–65
Warashina H, Hasegawa Y, Tsuchiya H, et al. Clinical, radiographic, and thermographic assessment of Osteoarthritis in the knee joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 852–4
Scott DL. The diagnosis and prognosis of early arthritis: rationale for new prognostic criteria. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 286–90
Kim JM, Weisman MH. When does rheumatoid arthritis begin and why do we need to know. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 473–84
O’Dell JR. Treating rheumatoid arthritis early: a window of opportunity? Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 283–5
Lorig KR, Mazonson PD, Holman HR. Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 439–46
Superio-Cabuslay E, Ward MM, Lorig KR. Patient education interventions in Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analytic comparison with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 292–301
O’Grady M, Fletcher J, Ortiz S. Therapeutic and physical fitness exercise prescription for older adults with joint disease: an evidence-based approach. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000; 26: 617–46
Minor MA. Exercise in the treatment of Osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1999; 25: 397–415
Yocum DE, Castro WL, Cornett M. Exercise, education, and behavioral modification as alternative therapy for pain and stress in rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000; 26: 145–59
van Baar ME, Dekker J, Oostendorp RAB, et al. Effectiveness of exercise in patients with Osteoarthritis of hip or knee: nine months’ follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 1123–30
Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 726–37
Surveillance for asthma: United States, 1980–1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ 2002; 51: 1–13
Vollmer WM, Osborne ML, Buist AS. 20-year trends in the prevalence of asthma and chronic airflow obstruction in an HMO. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1079–84
Erickson SR, Kirking DM. A cross-sectional analysis of work-related outcomes in adults with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002; 88: 292–300
Blanc PD, Trupin L, Eisner M, et al. The work impact of asthma and rhinitis: findings from a population-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 610–8
Weiss KB, Gergen PJ, Hodgson TA. An economic evaluation of asthma in the United States. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 862–3
Kowalski AF. Reducing asthma morbidity and mortality: cost containment strategies. AAOHN J 2000; 48: 418–22
Smith DH, Malone DC, Lawson KA, et al. A national estimate of the economic costs of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 787–93
Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O’Connor E, et al. Association of asthma control with health care utilization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 195–9
Van Graafeiland B. National asthma education and prevention program. Nurse Pract 2002; Suppl.: 7–12
Vollmer WM, Markson LE, O’Connor E, et al. Association of asthma control with health care utilization and quality of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160: 1647–52
Osborne ML, Vollmer WM, Linton KL, et al. Characteristics of patients with asthma within a large HMO. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 123–8
Osborne ML, Vollmer WM, Johnson RE, et al. Use of an automated prescription database to identify individuals with asthma. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1393–7
Burton WN, Connerty CM, Schultz AB, et al. Bank One’s worksite-based asthma disease management program. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43: 75–82
Boulet LP, Thivierge RL, Amesse A, et al. Towards excellence in asthma management (TEAM): a populational disease-management model. J Asthma 2002; 39: 341–50
Legorreta AP, Leung KM, Berkbigler D, et al. Outcomes of a population-based asthma management program: quality of life, absenteeism and utilization. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000; 85: 28–34
Baren JM, Shofer FS, Ivey B, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a simple emergency department intervention to improve the rate of primary care follow-up for patients with acute asthma exacerbations. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 115–22
Ignacio-Garcia JM, Pinto-Tenorio M, Chocron-Giraldez MJ, et al. Benefits at 3 yrs of an asthma education programme coupled with regular reinforcement. Eur Respir J 2002; 20: 1095–101
Gallefoss F, Bakke PS. Impact of patient education and self-management on morbidity in asthmatics and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2000; 94: 279–87
Buchner DA, Butt LT, De Stefano A, et al. Effects of an asthma management program on the asthmatic member: patient-center results of a 2-year study in a managed care organization. Am J Manag Care 1998; 4: 1288–97
Cote J, Cartier A, Robichaud P, et al. Influence on asthma morbidity of asthma education programs based on self-management plans following treatment optimization. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155: 1509–14
Lucas DO, Zimmer LO, Paul JE, et al. Two-year results from the asthma self-management program: long-term impact on health care services, costs, functional status, and productivity. J Asthma 2001; 38: 321–30
Gillespie JL. The value of disease management: part 3. balancing cost and quality in the treatment of asthma. Dis Manag 2002; 8: 225–32
Marks GM, Jalaludin BB, Williamson M, et al. Use of “preventer” medications and written asthma management plan among adults with asthma in New South Wales. Med J Aust 2000; 173: 407–10
Adams PF, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview, 1994. Vital Health Stat 10 1995; 193: 81–108
Burton WN, Schultz AB, Connerty CM, et al. Asthma disease management: a worksite-based asthma education program. Dis Manag 2001; 4: 3–13
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2004 [online]. Available at URL: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2004PWSecured.pdf. [Accessed 2004 August 3]
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Fact book fiscal year 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/02factbk.pdf. [Accessed 2003 Oct]
Cancer screening offered by worksites: United States, 1992 and 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46: 421–4
Cornfeld MJ, Schnoll RA, Tofani SH, et al. Implementation of a comprehensive cancer control program at the worksite: year one summary report. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 398–406
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/tableofcontents.htm [Accessed 2003 Jun 16]
Griffiths RI, McGrath MM, Vogel VG. Economic savings and costs of periodic mammographic screening in the workplace. Oncology 1996; 10: 285–9
Caplin LS, Coughlin SS. Worksite breast cancer screening programs. AAOHN J 1998; 46: 443–51
Lee CH. Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40: 395–407
Allen JD, Stoddard AM, Mays J, et al. Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman study. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 584–90
Reynolds HE, Larkin GN, Jackson VP, et al. Fixed-facility workplace screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 507–10
Burton W, Hoy D. The economic benefit of a corporate-sponsored mammography program. AWHP’s Worksite Health 1996 Summer; 3(2): 27–33
Schrammel P, Griffiths RI, Griffiths DB. A workplace breast cancer screening program. AAOHN J 1998; 46: 523–9
Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi JM. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 573–84
Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Myers R, et al. The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program. Prev Med 1999; 28: 276–83
Sandeep V, Hwang EW, Hofer TP, et al. Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance. Am J Med 2001; 111: 593–601
Coughlin SS, Caplan LS, Lawson HW. Cervical cancer screening in the workplace. AAOHN J 2002, 39
Snyder C, Schrammel PN, Griffiths CB, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the workplace. AAOHN J 1998; 46: 379–84
Kantrowitz W, Doyle J, Semeraro J, et al. Prostate cancer screening in a large corporation population. J Occup Environ Med 1995; 37: 1193–8
Kurtz ME, Given B, Given CW, et al. Relationships of barriers and facilitators to breast self-examination, mammography, and clinical breast examination in a worksite population. Cancer Nurs 1993; 16: 251–9
Myers RE, Vernon SW, Carpenter AV, et al. Employee response to a companysponsored program of colorectal and prostate cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev 1997; 21: 380–9
Musich S, McDonald T, Hirschland D, et al. Self-reported utilization of preventive health services among active employees 55 to 64 years. AWHP’s Worksite Health 2001; 8: 28–35
Powell-Griner E, Boen J, Bland S. Healthcare coverage and use of preventive services among the near elderly in the United States. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 882–6
Paskett ED, Masten KB, Phillips KC, et al. Receptivity of a worksite breast cancer screening education program. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 667–74
Mayer JA, Jones JA, Eckhardt LE, et al. Evaluation of a worksite mammography program. Am J Prev Med 1993; 9: 244–9
Thomas B, Stamler LL, Lafreniere KD, et al. Breast health educational interventions. AAOHN J 2002; 50: 460–7
Linnan LA, Emmons KM, Klar N, et al. Challenges to improving the impact of worksite cancer prevention programs: comparing reach, enrollment, and attrition using active versus passive recruitment strategies. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24: 157–66
Hope A, Kelleher C, O’Connor M. Lifestyle and cancer: the relative effects of a workplace health promotion program across gender and social class. Am J Health Promot 1999; 13: 315–8
Sorensen G, Stoddard AM, LaMontagne AD, et al. A comprehensive worksite cancer prevention intervention: behavior change results from a randomized control trial (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2002; 13: 493–502
National Institute of Mental Health. The numbers count: mental disorders in America 2001 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nimh.gov/publicat/numbers.cfm. [Accessed 2004 Aug 3]
Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ, Sederer LI, et al. The business case for quality mental health services: why employers should care about the mental health and well-being of their employees. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 320–30
Druss BG, Rosenheck RA, Sledge WH. Health and disability costs of depressive illness in a major corporation. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 1274–8
Conti DJ, Burton WN. The economic impact of depression in a workplace. J Occup Med 1994; 36: 983–8
Claxton AJ, Chawla AJ, et al. Absenteeism among employees treated for depression. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41: 605–11
Dewa CS, Goering P, Lin E, et al. Depression-related short-term disability in an employed population. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 628–33
Kessler RC, Barber C, Birnbaum HG, et al. Depression in the workplace: effects on short-term disability. Health Aff 1999; 18: 163–71
Broadhead WE, Blazer DG, George LK, et al. Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey. JAMA 1990; 264: 2524–8
Williams RA, Strasser PB. Depression in the workplace. Impact on employees. AAOHN J 1999; 47: 526–37
Nease DE, Malouin JM. Depression screening: a practical strategy. J Fam Pract 2003; 52: 118–24
Whooley MA, Avins Al, Miranda J, et al. Case-finding instruments for depression. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 429–45
Pignone MP, Baynes BN, Rushton JL, et al. Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 765–76
Valenstein M, Vijan S, Zeber JE, et al. The cost-utility of screening for depression in primary care. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 345–59
Riotto M. Depression in the workplace: negative effects, perspective on drug costs and benefit solutions. Benefits Q 2001; 17: 37–48
Zarkin GA, Bray JW, Qi J. The effect of employee assistance programs use on healthcare utilization. Health Serv Res 2000; 35: 77–100
Von Korff M, Katon W, Bush T, et al. Treatment costs, cost offset, and costeffectiveness of collaborative management of depression. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 143–9
Simon GE, Manning WG, Katzelnick DJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58: 181–7
Simon GE, Van Korff M, Ludman EJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a program to prevent depression relapse in primary care. Med Care 2002; 40: 941–50
Simon GE, Van Korff M, Rutter C, et al. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. BMJ 2000; 320: 550–4
Berndt ER, Finkelstein SN, Greenberg PE, et al. Workplace performance effects from chronic depression and its treatment. J Health Econ 1998; 17: 511–35
Simon GE, Revicki D, Heiligenstein J, et al. Recovery from depression, work productivity, and health care costs among primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22: 153–62
Schoenbaum M, Unutzer J, Sherbourne C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of practiceinitiated quality improvement for depression. JAMA 2001; 286: 1325–30
Lin EHB, Katon WJ, Simon GE, et al. Low-intensity treatment of depression in primary care: is it problematic? Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22: 78–83
Rosenheck RA, Druss BG, Stolar M, et al. Effect of declining mental health service use on employees of a large corporation. Health Aff 1999; 18: 193–203
Wollersheim JP. Depression, women and the workplace. Occup Med 1993; 8: 787–95
Dunnagan T, Peterson M, Haynes G. Mental health issues in the workplace: a case for a new managerial approach. J Occup Environ Med 2001; 43: 1073–80
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 917–32
Killilea T. Long-term consequences of type 2 diabetes mellitus: economic impact on society and managed care. Am J Manag Care 2002; 8: S441–9
Rubin RH, Altman WM, Mendelson DN. Health care expenditures for people with diabetes mellitus, 1992. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 78: 809A–F
Burton WN, Conti DH. Use of an integrated health data management warehouse to measure the employer costs of five chronic disease states. J Dis Manage 1998; 1: 17–26
Benjamin SM, Rolka DB, Valdez R, et al. Estimated number of adults with prediabetes in the US in 2000. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 645–9
American Diabetes Association: Pre-diabetes [online]. Available from URL: http://www.diabetes.org/main/info/pre-diabetes.jsp. [Accessed 2003 Jun 16]
Harris MI, Eastman RC. Early detection of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus: a US perspective. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000; 16: 230–6
Harris R, Donahue K, Rathore SS, et al. Screening adults for type 2 diabetes: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 215–34
Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson J, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1343–50
Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 725–31
Spijkerman AMW, Stehouwer CDA, Adriaanse MC, et al. Diabetic patients detected by population-based stepwise screening already have a diabetic cardiovascular risk profile. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1784–9
Steffens B. Cost-effective management of type 2 diabetes: providing quality care in a cost-constrained environment. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: S697–703
Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383–93
Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, et al. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA 2001; 285: 182–9
Burton WN, Connerty CM. Evaluation of a worksite-base patient education intervention targeted at employees with diabetes mellitus. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 702–6
Raji A, Gomes H, Beard JO, et al. A randomized trial comparing intensive and passive education in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1301–4
Norris SL, Schmid CH, Lau J, et al. Self-management education for adults with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1159–71
Lacey KO, Chyun DA, Grey M. An integrative literature review of cardiac risk factor management in diabetes education interventions. Diabetes Educ 2000; 26: 812–20
Sidorov J, Girolami S, Shull R, et al. Does diabetes disease management save money and improve outcomes? Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 684–9
Berger J, Slezak J, Stine N, et al. Economic impact of a diabetes disease management program in a self-insured health plan: early results. Dis Manag 2001; 4: 65–73
Rubin RJ, Dietrich KA, Hawk AD. Clinical and economic impact of implementing a comprehensive diabetes management program in managed care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 2635–42
Ibrahim IA, Beich J, Sidorov J, et al. Measuring outcomes of type 2 diabetes disease management program in an HMO setting. South Med J 2002; 95: 78–87
Berg GD, Wadhwa S. Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting. Manag Care 2002; 11: 42, 45–50
Strategies for reducing morbidity and mortality from diabetes through health-care system interventions and diabetes self-management in community settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001; 50: 1–15
Burton WN, Connerty CM. Worksite-based diabetes disease management program. Dis Manag 2002; 5: 1–8
The CDC Centers for Disease ControlDiabetes Cost-Effectiveness Group. Costeffectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2002; 287: 2542–51
Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A, et al. Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2000; 320: 1373–8
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, et al. Implementation, generalization and long-term results of the “choosing well diabetes self-management intervention. The CDC Centers for Disease Control Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Group. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 115–22
American Diabetes Association and National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 742–9
Hamdy O, Goodyear LJ, Horton ES. Diet and exercise in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001; 30: 883–907
Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1343–50
Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ. Diet and exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 10: 1722–8
American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2004 update. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association, 2003
Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, et al. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 16–22
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/tableofcontents.htm [Accessed 2003 Jun 16]
Brown AID, Garber AM. Risk factor modification for cardiac disease: a concise review of the cost-effectiveness of coronary heart disease prevention. Med Clin North Am 2000; 84: 279–97
Ashaya MO, Giles WH. Are heart disease patients more likely to have healthy lifestyle behaviors? Results from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. J Cardiovasc Risk 2003; 10: 207–12
Capriotti T, Kirby LG, Smeltzer SC. Unrecognized high blood pressure. AAOHN J 2000; 48: 338–43
Getliffe KA, Crouch R, Gage H, et al. Hypertension awareness, detection and treatment in a university setting: results of a worksite screening. Public Health 2000; 114: 361–6
Erfurt JC, Foote A, Heirich MA. The cost-effectiveness of work-site Wellness programs for hypertension control, weight loss, and smoking cessation. J Occup Med 1991; 33: 962–70
Foote A, Erfurt JC. The benefit to cost ratio of work-site blood pressure control programs. JAMA 1991; 265: 1283–6
Wang JS, Carson EC, Lapane KL, et al. The effect of physician office visits on CHD risk factor modification as part of a worksite cholesterol screening program. Prev Med 1999; 28: 221–8
Aldana SG, Greenlaw R, Diehl HA, et al. Impact of the Coronary Health Improvement Project (CHIP) on several employee populations. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 44: 831–9
Stein EA. Identification and treatment of individuals at high risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Med 2002; 112: 3S–9S
Fox J, Jones K. Lipid-lowering interventions in managed care settings. Am J Med 2001; 110: 24S–30S
Crouch MA. Effective use of statins to prevent coronary heart disease. Am Fam Physician 2000; 63: 309–20
Wilson MG, Edmunson J, DeJoy DM. Cost effectiveness of work-site cholesterol screening and intervention programs. J Occup Med 1992; 34: 642–9
Duffy CP. Worksite cholesterol screening and diet education programs. AAOHN J 1998; 46: 147–53
Guico-Pabia CJ, Cioffi L, Shoner LG. The Lucent-Takes-Heart cardiovascular health management program. AAOHN J 2002; 50: 365–72
Nilsson PM, Klasson EB, Nyberg P. Life-style intervention at the worksite: reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001; 27: 57–62
Gomel MK, Oldenburg B, Simpson JM, et al. Composite cardiovascular risk outcomes of a work-site intervention trial. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 673–6
Byers T, Mullis R, Anderson J, et al. The costs and effects of a nutritional education program following work-site cholesterol screening. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 650–5
Glasgow RE, Terborg JR, Strycker LA, et al. Take Heart II: replication of a worksite health promotion trial. J Behav Med 1997; 20: 143–61
Angotti CM, Chan WT, Sample CJ, et al. Combined dietary and exercise intervention for control of serum cholesterol in the workplace. Am J Health Promot 2000; 15: 9–16
Wasserman J, Whitmer RW, Bazzarre TL, et al. Gender-specific effects of modifiable health risk factors on coronary heart disease and related expenditures. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 1060–9
Anderson J, Dusenbury L. Worksite cholesterol and nutrition. AAOHN J 1999; 47: 99–106
Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, et al. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA 2002; 288: 1994–2000
Manson JE, Hu FB, Rich-Edward JW, et al. A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 650–8
Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Walker M, et al. Lifestyle and 15-year survival of heart attack, stroke and diabetes in middle-aged British men. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 2433–40
Smith SC. Risk reduction therapies for patients with coronary artery disease: a call for increased implementation. Am J Med 1998; 104: 23S–6S
Gaspoz JM, Coxson PG, Goldman PA, et al. Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clorpidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1800–6
Lipton RB, Silberstein SD, Burton WN. Relieving an employer’s economic headache: ten action steps for managing migraine in the workplace. Am J Integrat Healthcare 1997; 1: 26–31
Warshaw LJ, Burton WN, Schneider WJ. Role of the workplace in migraine disease management. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2001; 9: 99–115
Warshaw LJ, Burton WN. Cutting the costs of migraine: role of the employee health unit. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40: 943–53
Gallagher RM, Cutrer FM. Migraine: diagnosis, management, and new treatment options. Am J Manag Care 2002; 8(3 Suppl.): S58–SS73
Hu XH, Markson LE, Lipton RB, et al. Burden of migraine in the United States. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 813–8
Launer LJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD. The prevalence and characteristics of migraine in a population-based cohort. Neurology 1999; 53: 537–42
Burton WN, Conti DJ, Chen CY, et al. The economic burden of lost productivity due to migraine headache: a specific worksite analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2002, 529
Fishman P, Black L. Indirect costs of migraine in a managed care. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 50–7
Taking a disease management approach to migraine: based on a presentation by William Parham III, MD. Am J Manag Care 1999; 5: A104–10
Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Lipton RB. Lost workdays and decreased work effectiveness associated with headache in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39: 320–7
Gervil M, Ulrich V, Olesen J, et al. Screening for migraine in the general population: validation of a simple questionnaire. Cephalalgia 1998; 18: 342–8
Pop PHM, Gierveid CM, Karis HAM, et al. Epidemiological aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss. Eur J Neurol 2002; 9: 171–4
Lipton RB, Scher AI, Kolodner K, et al. Migraine in the United States: epidemiology and patterns of health care use. Neurology 2002; 58: 885–94
Rapoport AM, Adelman JU. Cost of migraine management: a pharmacoeconomic overview. Am J Manag Care 1998; 4: 531–45
Warshaw LJ, Burton WN, Silberstein SD, et al. Migraine: a problem for employers and managed care plans. Am J Manag Care 1997; 3: 1515–23
Loeppke R, Hymel PA, Lofland JH, et al. Health-related workplace productivity measurement: general and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM expert panel. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45: 349–59
Lerner DJ, Amick BC, Malspeis S, et al. The migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire: concepts and design. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 699–710
Schneider WJ, Furth P, Blalock TH, et al. A pilot study of a headache program in the workplace: the effect of education. J Occup Environ Med 1999; 41: 202–9
Mannix LK, Solomon GD, Kippes CM, et al. Impact of headache education program in the workplace. Neurology 1999; 53: 868–71
Cady RC, Ryan R, Jhingran P, et al. Sumatriptan injection reduces productivity loss during a migraine attack. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1013–8
Lofland JH, Kim SS, Batenhorst AS, et al. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of Sumatriptan in patients with migraine. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 1093–101
Mayo KW, Osterhaus JT. Health outcomes evaluations: estimating the impact of almotriptan in managed care settings. Am J Manag Care 2002; 8(3 Suppl.): S85–93
Fries JF, Carey C, McShane DJ. Patient education in arthritis: randomized controlled trial of a mail-delivered program. J Rheumatol 1997; 24(7): 1378–83
Bolton MB, Tilley BC, Kuder J, et al. The cost and effectiveness of an education program for adults who have asthma. J Gen Intern Med 1991; 6: 401–7
Henritze J, Brammell HL. Phase II cardiac Wellness at the Adolph Coors company. Am J Health Promot 1989; 4(1): 25–31
Martin LM, Leff M, Calonge N, et al. Validation of self-reported chronic conditiona and health services in a managed care population. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18: 215–8
Lewis A. Disease management for employers: a primer. Emp Ben Plan Rev 1998; 52(10): 44–5
Fletcher L. Disease management generating savings. Bus Insur 2000; 34(31): 3, 10
Acknowledgments
The authors received no funding for the preparation of this manuscript and have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musich, S.A., Schultz, A.B., Burton, W.N. et al. Overview of Disease Management Approaches. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 12, 299–326 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200412050-00003
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200412050-00003