Abstract
There is a growing interest in the US among payors, purchasers of healthcare benefits, providers, policy-makers and the public in the promise of disease management or disease-specific care. While there have been early efforts to standardize the application and measurement of disease-specific care programs, no national standards or uniform performance measurement specifications existed prior to 2002. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (Illinois, USA) published its national standards and conducted its first certification evaluation for disease-specific care in February 2002. The Disease-Specific Care (DSC) Certification Program is fundamentally based on an evaluation of a disease-specific care program’s compliance with the Joint Commission’s standards, implementation of adherence to clinical practice guidelines and its outcomes of care. Organizations that have achieved Joint Commission DSC Certification have reported impressive results from their performance measurement and improvement activities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. Employers concerned about the impact of rising health care costs [online]. Available from URL: http://www.Hewitt.com [Accessed 2003 Jan 14]
Anderson G. People with chronic health problems are heaviest users of medical care. Health Aff 2001 Nov/Dec; 20(6): 146–60
Cyberchondriacs. The Harris Poll [online]. Available from URL: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=299 [Accessed 2003 Jun 30]
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Report details national health care spending increases in 2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services 2003 Jan 8
Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002 Nov 11; 161: 2269–79
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Results of disease-specific care market research. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission Resources, Inc., 2001 Feb
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001
Kelly JT, Bernard DB. Clinical practice guidelines: foundation for effective disease management. In: Todd WE, Nash D, editors. Disease management. Chicago (IL): American Hospital Publishing, 1997: 157–78.
Hefty participation rates facilitate solid outcomes and RDI for telephone diabetes effort. Dis Manage Advisor. Atlanta (GA): National Health Information, L.L.C., 2001 Oct
Zitter M. A new paradigm in health care delivery: disease management. In: Todd W, Nash D, editors. Disease management. Chicago (IL): American Hospital Publishing, 1997: 1–26
American Healthways. Standards for disease management programs. Nashville: American Healthway, 1999
Wagner E. Improving chronic illness care [online]. Seattle: MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, 2000. Available from URL: http://www.improving-chroniccare.org [Accessed 2003 Aug 19]
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Disease-specific care certification manual. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission Resources, Inc., 2001
Acknowledgements
The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mowll, C.A. Certification for Disease-Specific Care Programs. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 11, 545–550 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311090-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200311090-00001