Skip to main content
Log in

Methods Aimed at Improving Asthma Care and Outcomes Management

A Case Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Disease Management & Health Outcomes

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the experience of one managed care organization (MCO) [Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Midwest Region] to the experience of a reference group of 15 other MCOs participating in a study designed to test the usefulness of outcomes management information in developing and implementing interventions to improve the quality of care in asthma.

Study design: Prospective study.

Patients and methods: Adult patients with moderate or severe asthma enrolled in sixteen participating MCOs who completed an initial baseline survey in 1993 and follow-up surveys in 1994 and 1995. Data analyses focused on differences between Anthem and the reference group at each round of data collection as well as longitudinal analyses of changes over time.

Results: Baseline data suggested some deficiencies in care at all MCO sites. Cross-sectional comparisons between Anthem and the reference group revealed statistically significant differences in outcomes measures (hospitalization and emergency room visits, canceled activities per month because of asthma, asthma attacks per month, and work days lost in the past month). Improvements in these outcomes were reported over the subsequent two years. Patients at Anthem reported a significantly greater increase in peak flow meter (PFM) possession than did those in the reference group (p = 0.01) which may have resulted from an administrative change that made PFMs a funded item. However, other interventions (e.g. educational programs) may have also contributed to the improvements.

Conclusions: This study illustrates the ability of MCOs to collect and use patient-reported outcomes data to monitor and improve patient care. Such information allowed this national group of participating MCOs to identify deficiencies in quality of care provided, design tailored interventions and measure the potential impact of these interventions on patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clark NM, Nothwehr F, Gong M, et al. Physician-patient partnership in managing chronic illness. Acad Med 1995; 70: 957–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wissow LS, Worshow M, Box J, et al. Case management and quality assurance to improve care of inner city children with asthma. Am J Dis Child 1988; 142: 748–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for asthma: United States, 1960–1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998; 47: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss KB, Gergen PJ, Hodgson TA. An economic evaluation of asthma in the United States. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 862–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1991. No. 91–3042.

  6. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 2: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1997. No. 97–4051.

  7. Lahdensuo A, Haahtela T, Herrala J, et al. Randomized comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year. BMJ 1996; 312: 748–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D’souza W, Crane J, Brugess C, et al. Community-based asthma care: trial of a “credit card” asthma self-management plan. Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Charlton I, Charton G, Broomfield J, et al. Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self-management plans for control of asthma in general practice. BMJ 1990; 301: 1355–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson SR, Yamada EG, Sudhakar R, et al. A controlled trial of an environmental tobacco smoke reduction intervention in low-income children with asthma. Chest 2001; 120: 1709–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Self TH, Finch CK. Studies demonstrating improved outcomes in patients with asthma: a 10-year review. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 187–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellwood PM. Shattuck Lecture — outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinwachs DM, Wu AW, Skinner EA. Outcomes management: how will it work? Health Aff 1994; 13: 153–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Diette GB, Wu AW, Skinner EA, et al. Treatment patterns among adult patients with asthma: factors associated with overuse of inhaled -agonists and underuse of inhaled corticosteroids. Arch Int Med 1999; 159: 2697–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu AW, Young Y, Skinner EA, et al. Quality of care and outcomes of adult asthmatics treated by specialists and generalists in managed care. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2554–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. International Classification of Diseases, ninth rev. Clinical modification. Reston (VA): St. Anthony Publishing, 1997.

  17. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short-form health status survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: MS253–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson MD, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic co-morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. SAS Institute Inc. Release 6.12 SAS/STAT software. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc., 1996.

  21. Legorreta AP, Christian-Herman J, O’Connor RD, et al. Compliance with national asthma management guidelines and specialty care: a health maintenance organization experience. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 457–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Homer CJ, Szilagyi P, Rodewald L, et al. Does quality of care affect rates of hospitalization for childhood asthma? Pediatrics 1996; 98: 18–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Butz AM, Malveaux FJ, Eggleston PA, et al. A review of community-based asthma interventions for inner-city children. Ped Asthma Allergy Immunol 1994; 8: 149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Webb LZ, Kuykendall DH, Zeiger RS, et al. The impact of status asthmaticus practice guidelines on patient outcome and physician behavior. QRB Qual Rev Bull 1992; 18: 471–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lemanske RF, Busse WW. Asthma. JAMA 1997; 278: 1855–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Enright PL, Lebowitz MD, Cockroft DW. Physiologic measures: pulmonary function tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149: S9–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Donahue JG, Weiss ST, Livingston JM, et al. Inhaled steroids and the risk of hospitalization for asthma. JAMA 1997; 227: 887–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelso TM, Self TH, Rumbak MJ, et al. Educational and long-term therapeutic intervention in the ED: effect on outcomes in adult indigent minority asthmatics. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 632–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Green LW. Eriksen MP. Schor EL. Preventive practices by physicians: behavioral determinants and potential interventions [review]. Am J Prev Med 1988; 4 Suppl. 4: 101–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Homer CJ. Asthma disease management. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1461–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bauman A, Cooper C, Bridges-Webb C, et al. Asthma management and morbidity in Australian general practice: the relationship between patient and doctor estimates. Respir Med 1995; 89: 665–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Becky Clark for her assistance with data management for this study.

This study was funded by the Employers Managed Health Care Association Outcomes Management System consortium. It was also funded, in part, by an unrestricted research grant from Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield Midwest Region.

Robert C. McDonald was an employee of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield at the time this study was performed and is currently employed by Anthem Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert W. Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen-Rameym, F.C., Diette, G.B., McDonald, R.C. et al. Methods Aimed at Improving Asthma Care and Outcomes Management. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 10, 495–503 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210080-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210080-00006

Keywords

Navigation