Abstract
Diabetes mellitus has considerable and increasing importance in England. The burden of illness is concentrated in ethnic minority groups and socioeconomically deprived areas. Evidence for effective clinical care has increased following the results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study but current diabetes care services are variable in quality. These inequalities and inequities are being actively addressed through current national policies to improve access and quality of care through agreed national standards. These standards encourage a shift towards a patient-centered, primary-care led service working closely with multidisciplinary diabetes specialists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Williams R. Diabetes mellitus. In: Stevens A, Raftery J, editors. Health care needs assessment: the epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical, 1994. Web update (2000). Available from URL: http://hcna.radcliffe-online.com. [Accessed 20001 Oct 26]
DECODE Study Group. Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data. BMJ 1998; 317:371–5
Yudkin JS, Forrest RD, Jackson CA, et al. The prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in a British population. Diabetes Care 1993; 116: 1530
Chaturvedi N, McKeigue PM, Marmot MG. Relationship of glucose intolerance to coronary risk in Afro-Caribbeans compared with Europeans. Diabetologia 1994; 37: 765–72
McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmot MG. Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet 1991; 337: 382–6
Cruickshank JK, Cooper J, Burnett M, et al. Ethnic differences in fasting plasma C-peptide and insulin in relation to glucose tolerance and blood pressure. Lancet 1991; 338: 842–7
King H, Rewers M, WHO ad hoc diabetes reporting group. Global estimates of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in adults. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 157–77
Gulliford MC, Mejia A. Trends in diabetes mellitus in Greater London 1991–2011: associations with ethnicity. Diabetic Med 1999; 16: 174–5
EURODIAB ACE Study Group. Variation and trends in incidence of childhood diabetes in Europe. Lancet 2000; 355: 873–6
Amos AF, McCarty DJ, Zimmet P. The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications; estimates and projections to the year 2010. Diabetic Med 1997; 14 Suppl. 5: 1–85
Roderick PJ, Raleigh VS, Hallam L, et al. The need and demand for renal replacement therapy in ethnic minorities in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 334–9
Roderick P, Clements S, Diamond I, et al. Estimating demand for renal replacement therapy in Greater London: the impact of demographic trends in ethnic minority populations. Health Trends 1998; 30: 46–50
Currie CJ, Kraus D, Morgan CL, et al. NHS acute sector expenditure for diabetes: the present, future, and excess in-patient cost of care. Diabet Med 1997; 14: 686–92
Department of Health. Health survey for England: trend data for adults 1993–1999 [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.doh.gov.uk/stats/trends1.htm [Accessed 2001 March 20]
Chinn S, Rona RJ. Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British children, 1974–1994. BMJ 2001; 322: 24–6
Khaw KT, Wareham N, Luben R, et al. glycosylated haemoglobin, diabetes and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of EPIC Norfolk. BMJ 2001; 322: 1–6
Eriksson K-F, Lindgarde F. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by diet and physical exercise: the 6 year Malmo feasibility study. Diabetologia 1991; 34: 891–8
Pan X, Li G, Hu Y, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance: the Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 537–44
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research group. The diabetes prevention program: design and methods for a clinical trial in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 623–34
CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Study Group. The cost-effectiveness of screening for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 1998; 280: 1757–63
Goyder EC, Irwig LM. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a decision analytic approach. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 469–77
British Diabetic Association. Diabetes in the UK. London: British Diabetic Association, 1996
UK Audit Commission. Testing times: a review of diabetes services in England. London: UK Audit Commission, 2000
Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria. BMJ 2001; 322: 986–8
UKPDS 34. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonyureas or insulin compared with conventional therapy and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 1998; 352: 854–65
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998; 317: 703–13
UKPDS. Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40. BMJ 1998; 317: 720–6
Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A, et al. Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alonside randomised control trial (UKPDS 41). BMJ 2000; 320: 1373–8
Coster S, Gulliford MC, Seed P, et al. Self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus; a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 755–61
Muhlhauser I, Berger M. Evidence-based patient information in diabetes. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 823–9
Melville A, Richardson R, McIntosh A, et al. Complications of diabetes: screening for retinopathy and foot ulcers. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 137–41
Department of Health. Health service guidelines, 1997. Key features of a good service. HSG (97). London: Department of Health, 1997
Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software, 2001
Griffin S, Kinmonth AL. Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes (Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Available in the Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD ROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; issue 2. Oxford: Oxford Update Software, 2000: (2) CD000541
Greenhalgh T. Shared Care for Diabetes. Occ Paper 67. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners, 1994
Pierce M, Agarwal G, Ridout D. A survey of diabetes care in general practice in England and Wales. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 542–5
Nelson M, Lean MEJ, Connor H, et al. Survey of dietetic provision for patients with diabetes. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 565–71
Larme AC, Pugh JA. Attitudes of primary-care providers towards diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1391–6
Murphy L, Kinmonth AL. No symptoms, no problem? Patients understanding of non-insulin dependent diabetes. Fam Pract 1995; 12: 184–92
Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of patient-centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ 1998; 317: 1202–8
Woodcock A, Kinmonth AL, Campbell MJ, et al. Diabetes Care from diagnosis: effects of training in patient centre care on beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of primary-care professionals. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 37: 65–79
Department of Health. The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: HMSO, 2000
Evans JMM, Newton RW, Ruta DA, et al. Socio-economic status and prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 478–80
Kelly WF, Mahmood R, Kelly MJ, et al. Influence of social deprivation on illness in diabetic patients. BMJ 1993; 307: 115–6
Weng C, Coppini DV, Sonksen PH. Geographic and social factors are related to increased morbidity and mortality rates in diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2000; 17: 612–7
Eachus J, Williams M, Chan P, et al. Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of health. BMJ 1996; 312: 287–92
Kelly WF, Mahmood R, Kelly MJ, et al. Influence of social deprivation on illness in diabetic patients. BMJ 1993; 307: 115–6
Khunti K, Ganguli S, Lowy A. Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 27–32
Robbins JM, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, et al. Excess type 2 diabetes in African-American women and men aged 40 to 74 and socio-economic status: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 839–45
Simmonds D, Weblemoe T, Voyle J, et al. Personal barriers to diabetes care: lessons from a multi-ethnic community in New Zealand. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 958–64
Will JC, Galuska DA, Ford ES, et al. Cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus: evidence of a positive association from a large prospectice cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 540–6
Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC. Determinants of glycated haemoglobin in the general population: associations with diet, alcohol and cigarette smoking. Eur J Nutr 2001; 55: 615–23
Goyder EC, McNally PG, Botha JL. Inequalities in access to diabetes care: evidence from a historical cohort study. Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 85–9
Hawthorne K, Tomlinson S. Pakistani moslems with type 2 diabetes mellitus: effect of sex, literacy skills, known diabetic complications and place of care on diabetic knowledge, reported self-monitoring management and glycaemic control. Diabet Med 1999; 16: 591–7
Mires GJ, Williams FL, Harper V. Screening practices for gestational diabetes mellitus in UK obstetric units. Diabet Med 1999; 16: 138–14
Acknowledgements
The authors have stated that there were no conflicts of interest related to the contents of this paper and there was no funding to assist with the preparation of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohiddin, A., Gulliford, M. Optimizing the Delivery of Effective Diabetes Care. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 9, 683–690 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109120-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109120-00002