Skip to main content
Log in

Specialty Pharmacies

Filling a Unique Position in the Disease Management Industry

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Specialty pharmacy service (SPS) companies are filling a new niche in the expanding role of chronic disease management (DM). Thesecompanies distribute expensive biotechnology drugs to patients who have relatively uncommon but very expensive chronic diseases. Although there are considerable differences among the competitors, some of the SPS companies have evolved into organizations that have built data systems and processes rivaling those offered by dedicated DM companies. These data systems and processes will allow several of the companies to demonstrate improved medical outcomes.

Since the SPS companies can fashion contracts where they do not charge a separate fee for the DM portion of their services, this model is especially attractive to managed-care organizations (MCOs) [both preferred provider organizations and health maintenance organizations] and to third-party administrators that operate in self-insured or administrative services only environments. These companies can also reduce the administrative burden for MCOs and the ‘hassle factor’ for physicians and patients by performing delegated prior-authorization functions for the MCO.

Pharmaceutical companies have played a key part in advising and assisting the development of the unique role of SPS companies. Future challenges and opportunities for this sector include: integration of comorbid conditions; publication of outcome results; customization of educational material to individual patient needs; and accreditation. MCOs and investors will recognize the development of an integrated, proven DM, outcome-driven business model as a key differentiation factor in this niche industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Disease Management Association of America. [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.dmma.org [Accessed 2001 Sep 11]

  2. Chase H&Q. Healthcare services changing channels: the emergence of specialty pharmacy services for biotech drugs. Equity Research Industry Report. Chase H&Q, a division of Chase Securities Inc.

  3. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Disease management accreditation/certification [online]. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org/Programs/Accreditation/Certification/dmmain.htm [Accessed 2001 Aug 29]

  4. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. New medicines in development [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.phrma.org/searchcures/newmeds/biotech2000/bio_intro.phtml [Accessed 2001 Aug 29]

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Hepatitis Branch. Hepatitis C fact sheet [online]. Available from: URL: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/index.htm. [Accessed 2001 Sep]

  6. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Panel. Management of hepatitis C. NIH Consensus Statement 1997; 15(3): 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dulworth S, Patel S. The hepatitis C epidemic: looking at the tip of the iceberg. Minneapolis (MN): Milliman & Robertson, Inc, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Schiff ER, et al. Hepatitis Intervention Therapy Group. Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1485–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. US Dept of Human and Health Services. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HCV related diseases. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Human and Health Services, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997; 2c Suppl 1: 625–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schering Corporation. Be In Charge [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.beincharge.com http://www.beincharge.com [Accessed 2001 Aug 29]

  12. Teva Neuroscience. MSWatch [online]. Available from: URL: http://www.mswatch.comwww.mswatch.com [Accessed 2001 Aug 29]

  13. Minden SI, Schiffer RB. Affective disorders in multiple sclerosis: review and recommendations for clinical research. Arch Neurol 1990; 47: 98–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadovnick AD, Eisen K, Ebers GC, et al. Cause of death in patients attending multiple sclerosis clinics. Neurology 1991; 41: 1193–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Morrow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrow, T. Specialty Pharmacies. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 9, 531–538 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109100-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109100-00002

Keywords

Navigation