Skip to main content
Log in

Management of Colorectal Cancer

Defining the Role of Raltitrexed

  • Drugs in Disease Management
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

In Europe and the US >300 000 cases of advanced colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year, and it is the third most common type of cancer after breast/prostate and lung cancers. The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with genetic predisposition or a family history of colorectal cancer. The 5-year survival rate varies depending on the stage at which colorectal cancer is diagnosed. Advanced colorectal cancer (stage IV, Duke’s D) has a 5-year survival rate of <5%.

Screening and early detection can significantly increase the likelihood of survival. Treatment of early colorectal cancer relies on surgery and/or chemotherapy. Patients with stage I to II (Duke’s A to B) colorectal cancer have a good prognosis, with a >70% survival rate at 5 years. While the management of advanced colorectal cancer also encompasses these options, treatment is largely palliative. Fluorouracil is currently the gold standard for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, despite its widespread use it is associated with a relatively low tumor response rate (<15%), drug regimens are complex and toxicities are significant.

Raltitrexed, a specific thymidylate synthase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. As first-line therapy it has similar efficacy to fluorouracil in terms of tumor response rates (approximately 14 to 19%) and overall survival duration (approximately 10 to 11 months), although disease progression may be sooner with raltitrexed. However, in an effort to further increase survival duration, raltitrexed has been administered concomitantly with fluorouracil or oxaliplatin therapy as first- or second-line therapy, with promising preliminary results.

In comparative clinical trials, leukopenia and mucositis were more commonly associated with fluorouracil than with raltitrexed monotherapy. In contrast, elevated transaminase levels, which were not clinically significant, and anemia were more common with the raltitrexed regimen.

Higher drug acquisition costs for raltitrexed than for fluorouracil are partially offset by reduced pharmacy resource utilization, lower drug administration costs and reduced costs relating to the management of chemotherapy-induced adverse events. Overall treatment-related costs were slightly higher for raltitrexed than for fluorouracil administered according to the Mayo regimen, but lower than either the Lokich or De Gramont regimens.

Early comparative quality-of-life assessments favoured raltitrexed over fluorouracil; however, comparisons at 15 weeks failed to show any clear preference in favor of either treatment. Palliative improvements occurred in patients who responded to treatment or those who had disease stabilization in both treatment groups.

Conclusions

Raltitrexed is a first-line treatment option for the management of advanced colorectal cancer and offers a more convenient administration regimen than traditional fluorouracil infusion regimens. Available data suggest that it may have lower overall treatment costs than some but not all fluorouracil regimens; however, formal cost-effectiveness comparisons (in terms of cost per clinical outcome) are not available. Preliminary results from trials of combination therapy with raltitrexed and either fluorouracil or oxaliplatin are promising; however, further data on raltitrexed combination therapy are necessary to better determine its place in the management of advanced colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Table VI

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adjei AA. A review of the pharmacology and clinical activity of new chemotherapy agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999 Sep; 48: 265–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackman AL, Boyle FT, Harrap KR. Tomudex (ZD1694): from concept to care, a programme in rational drug discovery. Invest New Drugs 1996; 14(3): 305–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor SC. Raltitrexed for advanced colorectal cancer: the story so far. Cancer Pract 2000 Jan–Feb; 8: 51–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunasekara NS, Faulds D. Raltitrexed: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. Drugs 1998 Mar; 55: 423–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobrero AF. The potential role of Tomudex in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Tumori 1997 Mar–Apr; 83: 576–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rudy DR, Zdon MJ. Update on colorectal cancer. Am Fam Physician 2000; 61(6): 1759–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Midgley R, Kerr D. Colorectal cancer [see comments]. Lancet 1999 Jan 30; 353: 391–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Briskey EN, Pamies RJ. Colorectal cancer: update on recent advances and thier impact on screening protocols. J Natl Med Assoc 2000; 92(5): 222–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seifeldin R, Hantsch JJ. The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the United States. Clin Ther 1999 Aug; 21: 1370–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van-Cutsem E, Peeters M, Verslype C, et al. The medical treatment of colorectal cancer: actual status and new developments. Hepatogastroenterology 1999 Mar–Apr; 46: 709–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bleiburg H. Colorectal cancer-is there an alternative to 5-FU? Eur J Cancer 1997; 33(4): 536–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuwada SK. Colorectal cancer 2000: education and screening are essential if outcomes are to improve. Postgrad Med 2000; 107(5): 96–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mushinski M. Variation in in-hospital charges for colorectal cancer treatment. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co 1998 Jan–Mar; 79: 19–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peeters M, Haller DG. Therapy for early-stage colorectal cancer. Oncology Huntingt 1999 Mar; 13: 307–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bleiberg H. Role of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: new opportunities. Semin Oncol 1996 Feb; 23(1) Suppl. 3: 42–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jansman FGA, Sleijfer DT, Coenen JLLM, et al. Risk factors determining chemotherapeutic toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Drug Saf 2000; 23(4): 255–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodger K. Colorectal cancer. J R Coll Physicians Lond 2000; 34(2): 197–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shike M. Diet and lifestyle in the prevention of colorectal cancer: an overview. Am J Med 1999; 106 Suppl. 1A: 11S–5S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Troisi RJ, Freedman AN, Devesa SS. Incidence of colorectal carcinoma in the U.S.: an update of trends by gender, race, age, subsite, and stage, 1975–1994. Cancer 1999 Apr 15; 85: 1670–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schrag D, Weeks J. Costs and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer prevention and therapy. Semin Oncol 1999 Oct; 26: 561–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bond JH. Screening guidelines for colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1999 Jan 25; 106: 7S–10S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ivanovich JL, Read TE, Ciske DJ, et al. A practical approach to familial and hereditary colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1999 Jul; 107: 68–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee MI, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Hsieh C. Physical activity and risk of developing colorectal cancer among college alumni. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83: 1324–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Houlston RS, Murday V, Harocopos C, et al. Screening and genetic counselling for relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a family cancer clinic. BMJ 2000; 301: 366–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunlop MG. Colorectal cancer. BMJ 1997 Jun 28; 314: 1882–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. National Cancer Institute. Colon cancer. In: PDQ Information for healthcare professionals [online]. CancerNet; 2000 Nov. Available from: URL: http://www.cancernet.nci.nih.gov [Accessed 2000 Sep 21]

  27. Labianca R, Pessi MA, Zamparelli G. Treatment of colorectal cancer: current guidelines and future prospects for drug therapy. Drugs 1997 Apr; 53: 593–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bleiberg H. Continuing the fight against advanced colorectal cancer: new and future treatment options. Anticancer Drugs 1998 Jan; 9: 18–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karapetis CS, Yip D, Harper PG. The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Pract 1999; 53(4): 287–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Koehne CH, Midgley R, Seymour M, et al. Advanced colorectal cancer: which regimens should we recommend? Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 877–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gordon NLM, Dawson AA, Bennett B, et al. Outcome in colorectal adenocarcinoma: two seven-year studies of a population. BMJ 1993; 307: 707–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Papamichael D. The use of thymidylate synthase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: current status. Oncologist 1999; 4: 478–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumor Adjuvant Therapy Group. Expectancy or primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 904–11

    Google Scholar 

  34. Caponigro F, Avallone A, McLeod H, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Tomudex combined with 5-fluorouracil plus levofolinic acid in advanced head and neck cancer and colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 3948–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Meta-analysis Group in Cancer. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(1): 301–8

    Google Scholar 

  36. Summerhayes M, Wanklyn SJ, Shakespeare RA, et al. Reduced pharmacy resource utilization associated with raltitrexed treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. J Oncol Pharm Practice 1997; 3(1): 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ledermann JA, Maughan TS, James RD, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer [abstract]. Br J Cancer 1999 Jul; 80 Suppl. 2: 20

    Google Scholar 

  38. AstraZeneca. Raltitrexed combination therapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Clinical Investigators Monograph. Cheshire: Astra Zeneca, 2000 Oct

  39. Sato A, Kurihara M, Horikoshi N, et al. Phase II study of raltitrexed (Tomudex®) in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 1999 Sep; 10: 741–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Raltitrexed: a convenient alternative for advanced colorectal cancer. Drug Ther Perspect 1998 Aug 17; 12 Suppl. 4: 1-5

  41. Culy C, Clemett D, Wiseman L. Oxaliplatin: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer and its potential in other malignancies. Drugs 2000; 60(4): 895–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Oxaliplatin.. In: BNF 40 Sep 2000. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britian. London: Bemrose Security Printing, 2000: 400

  43. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2000 Mar 25; 355: 1041–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343(13): 905–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Cutsem E, Cunningham D, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, et al. Clinical activity and benefit of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with colorectal cancer truly resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Eur J Cancer 1999; 35(1): 54–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Giacchetti S, Perpoint B, Ziadani R, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(1): 136–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(16): 2938–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Blackledge G. New developments in cancer treatment with the novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor raltitrexed (’Tomudex’). Br J Cancer 1998; 77 Suppl. 2: 29–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jackman AL, Kimbell R, Ford HER. Combination of raltitrexed with other cytotoxic agents: rationale and preclinical observations. Eur J Cancer 1999 Mar; 35 (Part A) Suppl. 1: S3–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schwartz GK, Harstrick A, Baron MG. Raltitrexed (Tomudex™) in combination with 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results from phase I clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35 Suppl. 1: S9–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Cunningham D, Zalcberg JR, Rath U, et al. Final results of a randomised trial comparing ‘Tomudex’ (raltitrexed) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1996 Nov; 7: 961–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pazdur R, Vincent M. Raltitrexed (Tomudex) versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU + LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): results of a randomized, multicenter, North American trial [abstract no. 801]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997 May 17–20; 16: 228a

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cocconi G, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, et al. Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998 Sep; 16: 2943–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Maughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al. Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimens in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): final results of MRC CR06 [[abstract]]. Ann Oncol 2000; 11 Suppl. 4: 43

    Google Scholar 

  55. Van Cutsem E. Future developments with ‘Tomudex’ (raltitrexed). Anticancer Drugs 1997; 8 Suppl. 2: S33–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Van-Cutsem E. Raltitrexed (Tomudex) in combination treatment for colorectal cancer: new perspectives. Eur J Cancer 1999 Mar; 35 Suppl. 1: S1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cascinu S, Silva RR, Labianca R, et al. A phase II study of tomudex alternated with methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1999 Aug; 10: 985–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kornek GV, Ulrich Pur H, Raderer M, et al. Oxaliplatin + Tomudex in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (cc): a disease-oriented phase I/II trial [abstract]. Onkologie 1999 Aug; 22 Suppl. 1: 80

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cambridge Laboratories. Fluorouracil. In: ABPI compendium of data sheets and summaries of product characteristics. London: Datapharm Publications Limited, 1996-1997: 185–6

    Google Scholar 

  60. AstraZeneca. Full prescribing information for ‘Tomudex’ (raltitrexed). Cheshire: AstraZeneca, 2000 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  61. Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr D, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer, [abstract no. 1007] Atlanta (GA): American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mel J, Feliu J, Camps C. ’Tomudex’ (raltitrexed) in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): an effective palliative treatment [abstact no. 1000]. American Society of Clinical Oncology; 36th Annual Meeting, 2000, May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  63. Douillard JY, Michel P, Gamelin E, et al. Raltitrexed (Tomudex) plus oxaliplatin: an active combination for first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [abstract]. 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2000: New Orleans LA, 250

    Google Scholar 

  64. Harstrick A, Mayer S, Hilger R, et al. Combination therapy with infusional 5-FU and ‘Tomudex’ for patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer- a phase I study. Ann Oncol 1998; 9 Suppl. 4: 35

    Google Scholar 

  65. Scheithaur W, Kornek G, Ulrich-Pur H. Promising therapeutic potential of oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC): results of a phase I/II trial [abstract no. 997]. American Society of Clinical Oncology; 6th Annual Meeting, 2000 May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fizazi K, Ducreux M, Ruffié P, et al. Phase I, dose-finding, and pharmacokinetic study of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(11): 2293–300

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mayer S, Vanhoefer U, Hilger R, et al. Extended phase I study of raltitrexed and infusional 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [abstract no. 1169]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2000, May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schwartz GK, Bertino J, Kemeny N, et al. Phase I trial of sequential raltitrexed (’Tomudex’) followed by 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [abstract no.977]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2000, May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  69. Osterlund P, Elomaa I, Virkkunen P, et al. A phase II study of raltitrexed (’Tomudex’) combined with carmofur in metastatic CRC [abstract no. 1104]. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2000, May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  70. Carnaghi C, Zucali P, Rimassa L. Promising activity of irinotecan (CPT11) and raltitrexed (ZD1694) as first line chemotherapy in metastatic cancer (MCC) [abstract no. 1211]. American Society of Clinical Oncology; 6th Annual Meeting, 2000 May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nobile M, Gozza A, Heouaine A, et al. Irinotecan (CPT11) and raltitrexed (Tomudex) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study [abstract no. 1220]. American Society of Clinical Oncology; 6th Annual Meeting, 2000 May 20–23, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ford HER, Cunningham D, Ross PJ, et al. Phase I study of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with advanced gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinoma. BrJ Cancer 2000; 18(2): 146–52

    Google Scholar 

  73. Michels JE, Harvey M, Darby A, et al. The combination of raltitrxed (Tomudex) and mitomycin-C in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer 2000 Jul; 83 Suppl. 1: 46

    Google Scholar 

  74. James R, Price P, Valentini V. Raltitrexed (Tomudex™) concomitant with radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal cancer: preliminary results of phase I studies. Eur J Cancer 1998; 35 Suppl. 1: S19–22

    Google Scholar 

  75. Valentini V, Smaniotto D, Fiorentino G, et al. Dose finding study of Tomudex concomitantly administered with perioperative radiotherapy in stage II-III resectable rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9 Suppl. 4: 44

    Google Scholar 

  76. James R, Price P, Valentini V. Raltitrexed (Tomudex™) concomitant with radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal cancer: preliminary results of phase I studies. Eur J Cancer A 1999 Mar; 35 Suppl. 1: 19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Botwood N, James R, Vernon C, et al. Raltitrexed (’Tomudex’) and radiotherapy can be combined as postoperative treatment for rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11(8): 1023–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. James RD, Vernon C, Price P, et al. A pilot study of ‘Tomudex’ plus radiotherapy in patients with inoperable/recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1998; 9 Suppl. 4: 41–2

    Google Scholar 

  79. Price P, James R, Smith M. ’Tomudex’ (raltitrexed) plus radiotherapy as post-operative treatment or palliative treatment for patients with rectal cancer: phase I studies [abstract no. 223]. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35 Suppl. 4: S72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Candido P, Piazza E, Cattaneo MT, et al. Raltitrexed in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer [abstract]. Tumori 1998 Sep–Oct; 84 Suppl. 1: 124

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zalcberg J. Overview of the tolerability of ‘Tomudex’ (raltitrexed): collective clinical experience in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 1997; 8 Suppl. 2: S17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Cunningham D, Zalcberg JR, Rath U, et al. ’Tomudex’ (ZD1694): results of a randomised trial in advanced colorectal cancer demonstrate efficacy and reduced mucositis and leucopenia. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A(12): 1945–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. AstraZeneca. Tomudex technical monograph: International edition. Cheshire: AstraZeneca, 2000 Aug

  84. Drug-company decision to end cancer trial [editorial]. Lancet 1999 Sept 25; 354 (9184): 1045

  85. Wils J. The establishment of a large collaborative trial programme in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. Br J Cancer 1998; 77 Suppl. 2: 23–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ford HER, Cunningham D. Safety of raltitrexed [letter]. Lancet 1999 Nov 20; 354: 1824–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Kerr D. Safety of raltitrexed [letter]. Lancet 1999 Nov 20; 354: 1825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Young A, Topham C, Moore J, et al. A patient preference study comparing raltitrexed (’Tomudex’) and bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil regimens in advanced colorectal cancer: influence of side-effects and administration attributes. Eur J Cancer Care 1999 Sep; 8: 154–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Ross P, Heron J, Cunningham D. Cost of treating advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison of treatment regimens. Eur J Cancer A 1996; 32A Suppl. 5: S13–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Groener MGH, van Ineveld BM, Byttebier G, et al. An economic evaluation of Tomudex (raltitrexed) and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 1999 Mar; 10: 283–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Kerr D, O’Connor KM. An economic comparison of the net clinical benefit and treatment costs of raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin (Mayo regimen) in advanced colorectal cancer. Journal of Drug Assessment 1999; 2: 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  92. Groener MGH, van Ineveld BM, Byttebier G, et al. Evaluation of relative costs of the cytostatic agents Tomudex® and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin as treatments for advanced colorectal cancer [abstract]. Eur J Cancer 1997 Nov; 33 (Part A) Suppl. 9: S4–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Elliott R. An analysis of drug costs for the management of chemotherapy-related side effects in advanced colorectal cancer. A comparison between raltitrexed (’Tomudex’) and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid. J Oncol Pharm Pract 1996; 2(3): 186–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Sculpher M, Palmer MK, Heyes A. Costs incurred by patients undergoing advanced colorectal cancer therapy: a comparison of raltitrexed and fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Pharmacoeconomics 2000 Apr; 17: 361–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Cunningham D. Mature results from three large controlled studies with raltitrexed (’Tomudex’). Br J Cancer 1998; 77 Suppl. 2: 15–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Anderson H, Palmer MK. Measuring quality of life: impact of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Experience from two recent large phase III trials. Br J Cancer 1998; 77 Suppl. 2: 9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna J. Matheson.

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: J. Bertino, Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York, USA; A. Jackman, CRC Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, England; D.J. Kerr, CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, Clinical Research Block, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England; R. Labianca, Division of Medical Oncology, S. Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy; D. Papamichael, Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; A. Sato, Department of Gastroenterology, Toyosu Hospital, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; E. Van Cutsem, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Data Selection

Sources: Medical literature published in any language since 1966 on Raltitrexed identified using Medline supplemented by AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis International, Auckland, New Zealand). Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug.

Search strategy: AdisBase search terms were ‘Colorectal-cancer’ and (‘guideline’ or ‘guideline-utilisation’ or ‘practice-guideline’ or ‘disease-management-programmes’ or ‘treatment-algorithms’ or ‘reviews-on-treatment’ or ‘drug-evaluations’ or ‘epidemiology’ or ‘cost-of-illness’ or ‘pathogenesis’), or ‘Raltitrexed’ and (‘review’ or ‘clinical-study’). Medline search terms were ‘Colorectal-neoplasms and (‘guidelines’ or ‘decision-making’ or ‘health-policy’ or ‘managed-care-programs’ or ‘epidemiology’ or ‘outcome-assessment-health-care’ or ‘clinical-protocols’ or ‘guideline in pt’ or ‘practice-guideline in pt’), or ‘Raltitrexed’ and ‘review in pt’. Searches were last updated 26 March 2001.

Selection: Studies in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received raltitrexed. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology were preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacoeconomic and epidemiological data are also included.

Index terms: colorectal cancer, ralitrexed, fluorouracil, disease management, review on treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matheson, A.J., Noble, S. Management of Colorectal Cancer. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 9, 269–287 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109050-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200109050-00004

Keywords

Navigation