Skip to main content
Log in

Management of Acute Otitis Media

Defining the Role of Cefuroxime Axetil

  • Drugs in Disease Management
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Growing concern about the rapid emergence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as β-lactamase-mediated resistance among Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, has lead to reconsideration of the management of acute Otitis media in children. Acute Otitis media is the most common disorder diagnosed by paediatricians and among the most common indications for which antibacterial agents are prescribed in children.

Although there is little consensus regarding the optimal management of children with acute Otitis media, the need for judicious use of antibacterial agents is generally recognised. Several initiatives have been undertaken in an attempt to improve the management practices for this infection. One recent example is the recommendations of the US Drug-Resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) Therapeutic Working Group which advocate an accurate diagnosis of acute Otitis media, a step-wise approach to treatment and a role for diagnostic tympanocentesis in children who do not respond to therapy. Based on pharmacokinetic and efficacy data, amoxicillin is recommended as first-line treatment. Cefuroxime axetil, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ceftriaxone are recommended as second-line options.

Conclusions: Cefuroxime axetil is one of very few oral agents which has proven clinical efficacy against S. pneumoniae, as well as β-lactamase-producing H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. Although not as palatable as some other oral paediatric formulations, it has significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, another oral agent with a similar activity profile, and can be administered conveniently in 2 divided daily doses. Cefuroxime axetil is, therefore, an important oral treatment option for children with acute otitis media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Fig. 2
Table V
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table VI

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenfeld RM. An evidence-based approach to treating Otitis media. Pediatr Clin North Am 1996 Dec; 43: 1165–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paradise JL. Otitis media in infants and children. Pediatrics 1980 May; 65: 917–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamer DH. IDCP guidelines: epiglottitis and Otitis. Infect Dis Clin Pract 1997; 6: 500–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boccazzi A, Careddu P. Acute Otitis media in pediatrics: are there rational issues for empiric therapy? Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16(3): S65–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Froom J, Culpepper L, Jacobs M, et al. Antimicrobials for acute Otitis media? A review from the International Primary Care Network [see comments]. BMJ 1997 Jul 12; 315: 98–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marchant CD, Shurin PA. Therapy of Otitis media. Pediatr Clin North Am 1983 Apr; 30: 281–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blumer JL. Fundamental basis for rational therapeutics in acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18(12): 1130–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedland IR, McCracken Jr GH. Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1994 Aug 11; 331: 377–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein JO, Bluestone CD. Management of Otitis media in the era of managed care. Adv Pediatr Infect Dis 1996; 12: 351–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, et al. Otitis media — principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents. Pediatrics 1998; 101 (Suppl. 1): 165–71

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Lydick E. The relative community burden of Otitis media and varicella. Clin Ther 1996 Sep–Oct; 18: 877–86, discussion 876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pichichero ME. Therapeutic considerations for management of Otitis media, sinusitis, and tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol 1992; 6(3): 167–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kligman EW. Treatment of Otitis media [see comments]. Am Fam Physician 1992 Jan; 45: 242–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Buchem FL, Peeters MF, van’t Hof MA. Acute Otitis media: a new treatment strategy. BMJ 1985 Apr 6; 290: 1033–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Diamant M, Diamant B. Abuse and timing of use of antibiotics in acute Otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1974 Sep; 100: 226–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bitnun A, Allen UD. Medical therapy of Otitis media: use, abuse, efficacy, and morbidity. J Otolaryngol 1998; 27 Suppl. 2: 26–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Block SL. Causative pathogens, antibiotic resistance and therapeutic considerations in acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997 Apr; 16(4): 449–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Poole MD. Implications of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17: 953–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dagan R. Can the choice of antibiotics for therapy of acute Otitis media be logical? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1998; 17(1): 1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karma P, Palva T, Kouvalainen K, et al. Finnish approach to the treatment of acute otitis media: report of the Finnish Consensus Conference. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 129 Suppl.: 1–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dowell SF, Butler JC, Giebink GS, et al. Acute Otitis media: management and surveillance in an era of pneumococcal resistance — a report from the Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Therapeutic Working Group [published erratum appears in Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999 Apr; 18 (4): 341] [see comments]. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999 Jan; 18: 1–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Leibovitz E, Turner D, Aran A, et al. Acute Otitis media (AOM) in infants <2 months of age: etiology, pathogen susceptibility patterns, clinical presentation and therapeutic approach [abstract no. 1973]. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto, 467

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pass RF. Respiratory virus infection and Otitis media. Pediatrics 1998 Aug; 102(2): 400–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Uhari M, Hietala J, Tuokko H. Risk of acute Otitis media in relation to the viral etiology of infections in children. Clin Infect Dis 1995 Mar; 20: 521–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pitkäranta A, Virolainen A, Jero J, et al. Detection of rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and Coronavirus infections in acute Otitis media by reverse transcriptase Polymerase chain reaction. Pediatrics 1998 Aug; 102(2): 291–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Felmingham D, Washington J, The Alexander Project Group. Trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial respiratory tract pathogens — findings of the Alexander Project 1992–1996. J Chemother 1999; 11(1): 5–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Felmingham D, Grüneberg RN, Alexander Project Group. The Alexander Project 1996–1997: latest susceptibility data from this international study of bacterial pathogens from community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45: 191–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacobs MR. Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: rational antibiotic choices. Am J Med 1999 May 3; 106: 19S–25S, discussion 48S–52S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Staples AL, Thornsberry C, Critchley IA, et al. Resistance in respiratory tract pathogens in 2000: a worldwide view [abstract no. 1221]. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto, 96

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoban DJ, Fluit AC, Roussel-Delvallez M, et al. Three year global experience of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–99) monitoring community-acquired respiratory tract infection (CARTI) pathogens: results from 17,166 strains of S. pneumoniae (SPN), H. influenzae (HI) and M. catarrhalis (MCAT) [abstract no. 1220]. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto, 96

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gates GA. Cost-effectiveness considerations in Otitis media treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996 Apr; 114(4): 525–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Niemelä M, Uhari M, Möttönen M, et al. Costs arising from Otitis media [see comments]. Acta Paediatr 1999 May; 88: 553–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Coyte PC, Asche CV, Eiden LM. The economic cost of Otitis media in Canada. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999 Jun 15; 49: 27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alsarraf R, Jung CJ, Perkins J, et al. Measuring the indirect and direct costs of acute Otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999 Jan; 125: 12–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan B, Wandstrat TL, Cunningham JR. Overall cost in the treatment of Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16 Suppl. 2: S9–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson D, Oster G, McGarry LJ, et al. Management of Otitis media among children in a large health insurance plan. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999 Mar; 18: 239–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nightingale CH, Belliveau PB, Quintiliani R. Cost issues and considerations when choosing antimicrobial agents. Infect Dis Clin Pract 1994; 3: 8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eiden LM, Coyte PC. Socioeconomic impact of Otitis media in North America. J Otolaryngol 1998; 27 Suppl. 2: 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stool SE, Field MJ. The impact of Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989 Jan; 8 Suppl. 1: S11–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenfeld RM, Goldsmith AJ, Tetlus L, et al. Quality of life for children with Otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997 Oct; 123: 1049–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Klein JO. Review of consensus reports on management of acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18: 1152–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosenfeld RM, Vertrees JE, Carr J, et al. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute Otitis media: metaanalysis of 5400 children from thirty-three randomized trials. J Pediatr 1994 Mar; 124(3): 355–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Del-Mar C, Glasziou P, Hayem M. Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute Otitis media? A metaanalysis [see comments]. BMJ 1997 May 24; 314: 1526–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Neill P. Acute Otitis media. BMJ 1999 Sep 25; 319: 833–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Berman S. Otitis media in children. N Engl J Med 1995 Jun 8; 332: 1560–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Werk LN, Bauchner H. Practical considerations when treating children with antimicrobials in the outpatient setting. Drugs 1998 Jun; 55: 779–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Craig WA. Interrelationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimens for broad-spectrum Cephalosporins. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1995; 22: 89–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pichichero ME, Reiner SA, Brook I, et al. Controversies in the medical management of persistent and recurrent acute Otitis media: recommendations of a clinical advisory committee. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000 Aug; 109 8 Suppl. 183: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  49. Craig WA, Andes D. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15(3): 255–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rocephin. Physicians’ desk reference. 54th ed. Montvale (NJ): Medical Economics Company, Inc, 2000: 2651–4

    Google Scholar 

  51. Glaxo Wellcome Inc. Ceftin tablets, oral suspension: product information. May 1997

  52. SmithKine Beecham. US Prescribing information for Augmentin. Mar 1999

  53. SmithKline Beecham. US prescribing information for Amoxil. Mar 2000

  54. Reed MD. The clinical pharmacology of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17(10): 957–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Harris AM, Fowler T, Moult A. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefuroxime axetil suspensions relative to respiratory pathogens [poster]. 9th International Congress of Infectious Diseases 2000 10–13 Apr; Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  56. Canafax DM, Yuan Z, Chonmaitree T, et al. Amoxicillin middle ear fluid penetration and pharmacokinetics in children with acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998 Feb; 17(2): 149–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bradley JS. Oral vs. intramuscular antibiotic therapy for acute Otitis media: which is best? Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18(12): 1147–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Klein JO. Clinical implications of antibiotic resistance for management of acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998 Nov; 17: 1084–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dowell SF, Schwartz B. Resistant pneumococci: protecting patients through judicious use of antibiotics [see comments]. Am Fam Physician 1997 Apr; 55: 1647–54, 1657–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Harrison CJ. Using antibiotic concentrations in middle ear fluid to predict potential clinical efficacy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16(2): S12–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Goldstein FW, Garau J. 30 years of penicillin-resistant 5. pneumoniae: myth or reality? Lancet 1997 Jul 26; 350: 233–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Leibovitz E, Piglansky L, Raiz S, et al. The bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of high-dose amoxicillin (HD-AMOX, 80 mg/kg/day tid) as first-line therapy for acute Otitis media (AOM) in children [abstract no. 106]. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto, 491

    Google Scholar 

  63. McCracken Jr GH. Prescribing antimicrobial agents for treatment of acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18(2): 1141–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kozyrskyj AL, Hildes-Ripstein GE, Longstaffe SE, et al. Treatment of acute Otitis media with a shortened course of antibiotics: a meta-analysis [see comments]. JAMA 1998 Jun 3; 279: 1736–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pichichero ME. Short course antibiotic therapy for respiratory infections: a review of the evidence. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000 Sep; 19(9): 929–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pichichero ME. Short courses of antibiotic in acute Otitis media and sinusitis infections. J Int Med Res 2000; 28 Suppl. 1: 25A–36A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Phillips WR. Appropriate use of antibiotics for URIs in children: Part I. Otitis media and acute sinusitis. Pediatric URI Consensus Team [see comments]. Am Fam Physician 1998 Oct 1; 58: 1113–8, 1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Damoiseaux RAMJ, van Balen FAM, Hoes AW, et al. Primary care based randomised double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute Otitis media in children aged under 2 years. BMJ 2000 Feb 5; 320: 350–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Otitis Media Guideline Panel. Managing Otitis media with effusion in young children: quick reference guide for clinicians. J Pharm Care Pain Symptom Control 1995; 3(2): 93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Glaxo Wellcome UK Limited. Cefuroxime axetil (Zinnat): summary of product characteristics. 25 Nov 1999

  71. Doern GV, Brueggemann A, Holley Jr HP, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40(5): 1208–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Spangler SK, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC. In vitro susceptibilities of 185 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to WY-49605 (SUN/SY 5555), a new oral penem, compared with those to penicillin G, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, Cefixime, Cefaclor, Cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, and cefdinir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38(12): 2902–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Liñares J, Alonso T, Pérez JL, et al. Decreased susceptibility of penicillin-resistant pneumococci to twenty-four β-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 30: 279–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fung-Tomc JC, Huczko E, Stickle T, et al. Antibacterial activities of cefprozil compared with those of 13 oral cephems and 3 macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995 Feb; 39(2): 533–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Barry AL, Pfaller MA, Fuchs PC, et al. In vitro activities of 12 orally administered antimicrobial agents against four species in 1992 and 1993. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994 Oct; 38(10): 2419–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Waites K, Swiatlo E, Gray B, et al. In vitro activities of oral antimicrobial agents against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for outpatient treatment. South Med J 1997 Jun; 90(6): 621–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Jones RN, Jacobs MR, Washington JA, et al. A 1994–95 survey of Haemophilus influenzae susceptibility to ten orally administered agents: a 187 clinical laboratory center sample in the United States. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1997; 27: 75–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Powell DA, James NC, Ossi MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime axetil suspension in infants and children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991 Oct; 35: 2042–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Thoroddsen E, Marr C, Efthymiopoulos C, et al. Concentration of cefuroxime in middle ear effusion of children with acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997 Oct; 16: 959–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Brodie DP, Griggs JV, Cunningham K. Comparative study of cefuroxime axetil suspension and amoxycillin syrup in the treatment of acute Otitis media in general practice. J Int Med Res 1990 May–Jun; 18: 235–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Syrogiannopoulos GA, Goumas PD, Haliotis FA, et al. Cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute Otitis media in children. J Chemother 1992 Aug; 4: 221–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Turik MA, Johns Jr D. Comparison of Cefaclor and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute Otitis media with effusion in children who failed amoxicillin therapy. J Chemother 1998 Aug; 10: 306–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Stahl JP, Archimbaud A. Treatment of acute Otitis media in children: comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillinclavulanate suspensions. Med Mal Infect 1995 Feb; 25: 147–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Pessey JJ, Gehanno P, Thoroddsen E, et al. Short course therapy with cefuroxime axetil for acute Otitis media: results of a randomized multicenter comparison with amoxicillin/clavulanate. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999 Oct; 18: 854–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Gooch III WM, Blair E, Puopolo A, et al. Effectiveness of five days of therapy with cefuroxime axetil suspension for treatment of acute Otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15: 157–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Pichichero M, Aronovitz GH, Gooch WM, et al. Comparison of cefuroxime axetil, Cefaclor, and amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium suspensions in acute Otitis media in infants and children. South Med J 1990 Oct; 83: 1174–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. McLinn SE. Cefuroxime axetil suspension in the treatment of acute Otitis media in children: a comparison with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid. Res Clin Forum 1990; 12(3): 67–73

    Google Scholar 

  88. McLinn SE, Moskal M, Goldfarb J, et al. Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions in treatment of acute otitis media with effusion in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994 Feb; 38: 315–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Kenna MA, Bluestone CD, Fall P, et al. Cefuroxime axetil versus Cefaclor in treatment of acute Otitis media. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Recent Advances in Otitis Media; 1987 Jun 1–4; Bal Harbour (FL), 214–6

    Google Scholar 

  90. Aronovitz GH. Treatment of otitis media with cefuroxime axetil. South Med J 1988; 81(8): 978–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. McLinn SE, Werner K, Cochetto DM. Clinical trial of cefuroxime axetil versus Cefaclor for acute Otitis media with effusion. Curr Ther Res 1988; 43(1): 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  92. Triqlia JM, Gaudelus J, Riebbels V, et al. Cefuroxime axetil (CAE) compared with Cefpodoxime proxetil (CPD) for treatment of acute Otitis media AOM) in pediatric patients [abstract no. P298]. Clin Microbiol Infect 1999 Mar; 5 Suppl. 3: 164

    Google Scholar 

  93. Adam D. Comparative randomised clinical trial of cefuroxime axetil suspension versus erythromycin suspension in children with Otitis media [abstract no. 1053]. 18th International Congress of Chemotherapy; 1993 Jun 27–Jul 2; Stockholm, 298

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kafetzis DA, Malaka-Zafiriou C, Bairamis T, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Clarithromycin suspension and cefuroxime axetil suspension in the treatment of acute otitis media in paediatric patients. Clin Drug Invest 1997 Sep; 14: 192–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Gehanno P, Lenoir G, Berche P. In vivo correlates for Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin resistance in acute otitis media. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995 Jan; 39(1): 271–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Dagan R, Abramson O, Leibovitz E, et al. Impaired bacteriologic response to oral Cephalosporins in acute otitis media caused by pneumococci with intermediate resistance to penicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996 Nov; 15: 980–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Pichichero ME. Recurrent and persistent otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000 Sep; 19(9): 911–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Harris AM, Wilson J, Marr C. Areview of the safety and tolerability profile of cefuroxime axetil in clinical studies in 3224 children and young adults compared with other oral antibiotics [poster]. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Infectious Diseases; 2000 10–13 May; Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  99. Steele RW, Estrada B, Begue RE, et al. A double-blind taste comparison of pediatric antibiotic suspensions. Clin Pediatr 1997 Apr: 193–9

  100. Chan DS, Deniers DM, Bass JW. Antimicrobial liquid formulations: a blind comparison of taste of 13 commonly prescribed medications. J Pharm Technol 1997 Sep/Oct; 13: 206–9

    Google Scholar 

  101. Dagan R, Shvartzman P, Liss Z. Variation in acceptance of common oral antibiotic suspensions. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1994; 13(8): 686–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Schwartz RH. Enhancing children’s satisfaction with antibiotic therapy: a taste study of several antibiotic suspensions. Curr Ther Res 2000 Aug; 61(8): 570–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline M. Spencer.

Additional information

Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: R. Alsarraf, Hedgewood Surgical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; A. Bitnun, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; P. Gehanno, Service d’Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France; J.J. Pessey, Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse, France; M.E. Pichichero, University of Rochester Medical Center, Microbiology/Immunology, Rochester, New York, USA; E. Thoroddsen, Medical Clinic, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Data Selection

Sources: Medical literature published in any language since 1966 on cefuroxime axetil, identified using Medline supplemented by AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis International, Auckland, New Zealand). Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug.

Search strategy: AdisBase search terms were ‘otitis-media’ and (‘guideline’ or ‘guideline-utilisation’ or ‘practice-guideline’ or ‘disease-management-programmes’ or ‘treatment-algorithms’ or ‘reviews-on-treatment’ or ‘drug-evaluations’ or ‘epidemiology’ or ‘cost-of-illness’ or ‘pathogenesis’), or ‘cefuroxime-axetil’ and (‘review’ or ‘clinical-study’). Medline search terms were ‘otitis media’ and (‘guidelines’ or ‘decision-making’ or ‘health-policy’ or ‘managed-care-programmes’ or ‘epidemiology’ or ‘outcome-assessment-health-care’ or ‘clinical-protocols’ or ‘guideline in pt’ or ‘practice-guideline in pt’), or ‘cefuroxime-axetil’ and ‘review in pt’. Searches were last updated 24 November 2000.

Selection: Studies in patients with otitis media who received cefuroxime axetil. Inclusion of studies was based mainly on the methods section of the trials. When available, large, well controlled trials with appropriate statistical methodology were preferred. Relevant pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, epidemiological and cost data are also included.

Index terms: cefuroxime axetil, otitis media, antibacterial activity, therapeutic use, pharmacokinetics, disease management, children, review on treatment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamb, H.M., Spencer, C.M. Management of Acute Otitis Media. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 8, 337–353 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200008060-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200008060-00004

Keywords

Navigation