Skip to main content
Log in

The Value of Disease Management

Approaching the Industrialisation of Modern Medicine

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Recent years have seen the beginning of an industrial revolution in healthcare delivery. Healthcare is being transformed from a cottage industry, in which each provider sets individual standards, to a quality-controlled enterprise with common, evidence-based standards of care. Disease management is fundamental to this transformation; it is based on the application of the industrial engineering principle of ‘total quality management’ to healthcare as ‘continuous quality improvement’.

As little evidence has been published in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the cost effectiveness of disease management, specific disease management programmes should be judged by the extent to which its design adheres to the principles of continuous quality improvement. Disease management should, furthermore, be integrated into the overall activities of the healthcare system rather than being a carve-out offering.

The true value of disease management is as a paradigm by which the healthcare system can re-engineer how it goes about its business — with clear goals, recognised standards and ongoing monitoring. The adoption of evidence-based best practice guidelines and the attendant reduction in practice variation will inevitably benefit millions of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong EP, Langley PC. Disease management programs. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996; 53: 53–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodenheimer T. Disease management in the American market. BMJ 2000; 320: 563–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berwick D. Contiinous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 53–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McLaughlin C, Kaluzny A. Continuous quality improvement in health care: theory, implementation, and applications. Gathersburg (MD): Aspen Publishers, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  6. The Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. The Dartmouth atlas of health care. Chicago (IL): American Hospital Publishing, Inc., 1999

    Google Scholar 

  7. Algatt-Bergstrom PJ, Markson LE, Murray RK, et al. A population-based approach to asthma disease management. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2000; 7: 179–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rich MW. Heart failure disease management: a critical review. J Card Fail 1999; 5: 64–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Steven Teutsch, James F. Murray and Alan Morrison for their contributions to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc L. Berger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, M.L., Nebenfuhr, P. & Murray, R.K. The Value of Disease Management. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 8, 181–184 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200008040-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200008040-00001

Keywords

Navigation