Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Economic Impact of Telemedicine

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Telemedicine is a communications technology that can be expected to influence investment in equipment, the delivery and organisation of health services and outcomes of healthcare. Analysis of the economic impact of telemedicine has so far been limited and has focused on cost studies for individual applications. Telemedicine initiatives should be compared with conventional alternatives. A search of recent literature revealed 20 such studies that included, usually limited, economic analyses. It is important to note, however, that such assessments apply to localised situations and may not be generalisable. Overall, the potential impact of telemedicine on healthcare systems remains unclear.

The challenges that lie ahead for telemedicine, and its economic assessment, include technological change, sustainability of applications, availability of outcomes and other data, and generalisability of evaluation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balas EA, Jaffrey F, Kuperman GJ. Electronic communication with patients: evaluation of distance medicine technology. JAMA 1997; 278: 152–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohinmaa A, Hailey D, Roine R. The assessment of telemedicine: general principles and a systematic review. Edmonton: STAKES and Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, 1999 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reid J. A telemedicine primer: understanding the issues. Billings (MT): Innovative Medical Communications, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crowe BL, Hailey DM, de Silva M. Teleradiology at a children’s hospital: a pilot study. J Telemed Telecare 1996; 2: 210–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wootton R. Telemedicine: acautious welcome. BMJ 1996; 313: 1380–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watts LA, Monk AF. Telemedicine: what happens in remote consultation? Int J Tech Assess Health Care 1999; 15: 220–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McIntosh E, Cairns J. A framework for the economic evaluation of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 1997; 3: 132–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald I, Hill S, Daly J, et al. Evaluating telemedicine in Victoria: a generic framework. Melbourne (VIC): Centre for the Study of Clinical Practice and Victorian Department of Human Services, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ohinmaa A, Reponen J, and Working Group. A model for the assessment of telemedicine and a plan for testing the model within five specialties. Helsinki: National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health (STAKES), 1997. FinOHTA Report No. 5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hailey D, Jacobs P, Simpson J, et al. An assessment framework for telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5: 162–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of Medicine, Committee on evaluating clinical applications of telemedicine. In: Field MJ, editor. Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications in health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halvorsen PA, Kristiansen IS. Radiology services for remote communities: cost minimisation study of telemedicine. BMJ 1996; 312: 1333–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crowe BL, Hailey DM, Carter R. Assessment of costs and benefits in the introduction of digital radiology systems. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 17–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Doze S, Simpson J, Hailey D, et al. Evaluation of a telepsychiatry pilot project. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5: 38–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergmo TS. An economic analysis of teleradiology versus a visiting radiologist service. J Telemed Telecare 1996; 2: 136–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergmo T. An economic analysis of teleconsultation in otorhinoaryngology. J Telemed Telecare 1997; 3: 194–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trott P, Blignault I. Cost evaluation of a telepsychiatry service in Northern Queensland. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4 Suppl. 1: 66–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Werner A, Anderson LE. Rural telepsychiatry is economically unsupportable: the Concorde crashes in a cornfield. Psychiatr Serv 1998; 49: 1287–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hailey D, Jennett P. The evolution of economic evaluation of telemedicine applications. In: Towards a framework for evaluation of telemedicine [workshop]. Melbourne, 1999 Feb 19–20. G7/8 SP4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, 3125 Manulife Place, 10180-101 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S4, Canada

    David M. Hailey (Senior Advisor)

  2. The Health Informatics Society of Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Bernard L. Crowe (Consultant)

Authors
  1. David M. Hailey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard L. Crowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Hailey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hailey, D.M., Crowe, B.L. Assessing the Economic Impact of Telemedicine. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 7, 187–192 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200007040-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200007040-00002

Keywords

Search

Navigation