Abstract
There is considerable merit in undertaking to shift disease patterns at the community level. Typical problems reflect difficulties in the application of community-based prevention programmes, rather than inherent deficiencies in the concept itself. Scientific issues bear as much on successful outcomes as project management and practice considerations. Nonetheless, given their limited success, it can be asked whether advocates of community-based programmes have been carried away with the rhetoric of health promotion, pursuing a romanticised vision of community. In this regard, some of the disappointments that have prevailed in recently published community trials may reflect an intentional avoidance of programmes or activities that serve people on a one-to-one level.
The equating of ‘community-based’ with ‘community-wide’ approaches to disease prevention overlooks the fact that social norms are institution-bound as much as they are the product of broader social forces. Future work must address the inward involvement of institutions in changing their own norms, not simply seeking outward cooperation in mass media and community-wide efforts for disease prevention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View (CA): Mayfield, 1999
Green LW. The theory of participation. Adv Health Educ 1986; 1(Pt A): 211–36
Rappaport J. Studies in empowerment: introduction to the issue. Prev Hum Serv 1984; 3: 1–7
Green LW, George MA, Daniel M, et al. Study of participatory research in health promotion: review and recommendations for the development of participatory research in health promotion in Canada. Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada, 1995
Puska P, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J, et al. The community-based strategy to prevent coronary heart disease: conclusions from ten years of the North Karelia Project. Ann Rev Public Health 1985; 6: 147–93
Gutzwiller F, Nater B, Martin J. Community-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Switzerland: methods and results of the National Research Program (NRP 1 A). Prev Med 1985; 14: 482–91
Farquhar JW, Fortman SP, Flora JA, et al. Effects of community-wide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project. JAMA 1990; 264: 359–65
Luepker RV, Murray DM, Jacobs DRJ, et al. Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention: risk factor changes in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Public Health 1994; 84(9): 1383–92
Carleton RA, Lasater TM, Assaf AR, et al. The Pawtucket heart health program: community changes in cardiovascular risk factors and projected disease risk. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(6): 777–85
Green LW, McAlister AL. Macro-intervention to support health behavior: some theoretical perspectives and practical reflections. Health Educ Q 1984; 11(3): 322–39
Daniel M, Green LW, Marion SA, et al. Effectiveness of community-directed diabetes prevention and control in a rural aboriginal population in British Columbia, Canada. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 815–32
Bang AT, Bang RA, Tale O, et al. Reduction in pneumonia mortality and total childhood mortality by means of community-based intervention trial in Gadchiroli, India. Lancet 1990; 336(8709): 201–6
COMMIT Research Group. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(2): 183–92
Pentz MA, Dwyer JH, MacKinnon DP, et al. Amulticommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Effects on drug use prevalence. JAMA 1989; 261(22): 3259–66
Worden JK, Flynn BS, Solomon LJ, et al. A community-wide breast self-exam education program. In: Engstrom PF, Mortenson LE, Anderson PN, editors. Advances in cancer control: the war on cancer, 15 years of progress. New York: Liss, 1987: 27–37
Fortmann SP, Flora JA, Winkleby MA, et al. Community intervention trials: reflections on the Stanford Five-City Project experience. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 576–86
Schooler C, Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, et al. Synthesis of findings and issues from community prevention trials. Ann Epidemiol 1997; 7 Suppl.: 54–68
Winkleby MA, Feldman H, Murray DM. Joint analysis of three community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular disease risk. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 645–58
Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985; 14: 32–8
Lock JQ, Wister AV. Intentions and changes in exercise and behaviour: a lifestyle perspective. Health Prom Int 1992; 7(3): 195–208
Daniel M, Green LW. Application of the Precede-Proceed planning model in diabetes prevention and control: a case illustration from a Canadian aboriginal community. Diab Spectrum 1995; 8(2): 74–84
Gyarfas I. Review of community intervention studies on cardiovascular risk factors. Clin Exp Hypertens Theor Pract 1992; A14(1–2): 223–37
Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992
Bunton R. Health promotion as social policy. In: Bunton R, Macdonald G, editors. Health promotion: disciplines and diversity. London: Routledge, 1993: 129–52
Green LW, Richard L, Potvin L. Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Prom 1996; 10(4): 270–81
Frankish CJ, Green LW. Organizational and community change as the basis for disease prevention and health promotion policy. Adv Med Sociol 1994; 4: 209–33
Sechrest L, Figueredo AJ. Program evaluation. Ann Rev Psychol 1993; 44: 645–74
Koepsell TD, Wagner EH, Cheadle AC, et al. Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs. Ann Rev Public Health 1992; 13: 31–57
Lipsey MW. Theory as method: small theories of treatments. In: Sechrest L, Perrin E, Bunker J, editors. Research methodology: strengthening causal interpretations of nonexperimental data (DHHS publ. no. (PHS) 90-3454). Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1990: 33–51
Weiss CH. Evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1998
Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 1980
Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1982; 37: 122–47
George MA, Daniel M, Green LW. Appraising and funding participatory research in health promotion. Int Q Community Health Educ 1999; 18(2): 181–97
O’Loughlin J, Renaud L, Richard L, et al. Correlates of the sustainability of community-based heart health promotion interventions. Prev Med 1998; 27: 702–12
Green LW, Ottoson JM. Community and population health. 8th ed. St. Louis: McGraw-Hill, 1999
Green LW. Community health promotion: applying the science of evaluation to the initial sprint of a marathon. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13(4): 255–8
Koepsell TD, Diehr PH, Cheadle A, et al. Invited commentary: Symposium on community intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 594–9
Ottoson JM, Green LW. Reconciling concept and context: theory of implementation. Adv Health Educ Prom 1987; 2: 353–82
Ratcliffe JW, Gonzalez-del-Valle A. Rigor in health-related research: toward an expanded conceptualization. Int J Health Serv 1988; 18(3): 361–92
Allison KR, Rootman I. Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: are they compatible? Health Prom Int 1996; 11(4): 333–40
Moos RH. Assessing the program environment: implications for program evaluation and design. In: Conrad KJ, Roberts-Gray C, editors. Evaluating program environments. New directions for program evaluation, no. 40. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988: 7–23
Rooney BL, Murray DM. A meta-analysis of smoking prevention programs after adjustment for errors in the unit of analysis. Health Educ Q 1996; 23(1): 48–64
Murray DM, McKinlay SM, Martin D, et al. Design and analysis issues in community trials. Eval Rev 1994; 18(4): 493–514
Murray DM, Moskowitz J, Dent C. Design and analysis issues in a community-based drug-use prevention trial. Am Behav Sci 1996; 39: 853–67
Bloom HS, Cordray DS, Light RS, editors. Lessons from selected program and policy areas. New directions for program evaluation, no. 37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988
Potvin L. Methodological challenges in evaluation of dissemination programs. Can J Public Health 1996; 87 Suppl. 2: S79–S83
Green LW, Frankish CJ. Finding the right mix of decentralized and centralized planning for health promotion. In: Beery B, Wagner E, Cheadle A, editors. Community-based health promotion: state of the art and recommendations for the future. Seattle (WA): University of Washington and Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 1996: 1–29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniel, M., Green, L.W. Community-Based Prevention and Chronic Disease Self-Management Programmes. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 6, 185–192 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906040-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906040-00001