Skip to main content
Log in

Guidelines for General Practitioners

Approaches for Managing the Information Influx for Effective Disease Management

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

The increasing speed at which new knowledge is generated and disseminated means that we have to learn knew ways of handling this information. Instead of trying to remember information in case we need it at a later date, we need to develop the skills of finding, appraising and using information as and when we need it. This information may range from detailed research information to distilled systematic reviews and guidelines. Rapid access to reliable information in a usable form will change both the way professionals work and the way patients approach their doctor. The speed of access to clinical guidance for the doctor will need to be complemented by the opportunity to access the more detailed research information on which the guidance is based.

The sheer volume of information means that clinicians can never hope to stay ahead of patients. Instead, professionals will need to develop different relationships with the public and patients, guiding them through the task of finding and filtering information which is valid and relevant to that particular person. This changing relationship from paternalism to partnership in disease management should be accompanied by a spirit of openness. Only in this way can professionals develop a trusting and meaningful relationship with their patients, the crux of which is to share uncertainty in the doctor patient relationship without losing credibility or perceived value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grimshaw J. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grimshaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: ensuring guidelines change clinical practice. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haines A, Feder G. Guidance on guidelines. BMJ 1992; 305: 785–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Editorial. Guidelines for doctors in the new world. Lancet 1992; 339: 1197–8

  5. Hayward RSA, Wilson MD, Tunis SR, et al. More informative abstracts of articles on clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 123–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheldon T. The good guide to guides. Health Service J 1994; 104: 34–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt G. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I: How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1993; 270: 2093–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Effective health care: implementing clinical guidelines. Leeds: University of Leeds, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farmer A. Medical practice guidelines: lessons from the United States. BMJ 1993; 307: 313–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development. BMJ 1996; 312: 760–1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based care: 2. Setting guidelines: how should manage this problem? Can Med Assoc J 1994; 150: 1417–23

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hadorn DC, Baker D, Hodges JS, et al. Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 749–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126(5): 376–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, et al. Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel? BMJ 1998; 317: 862–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Pencheon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pencheon, D. Guidelines for General Practitioners. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 6, 59–63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906020-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906020-00001

Keywords

Navigation