Skip to main content
Log in

Disease State Management Programmes

Approaches and Applications

  • Practical Disease Management
  • Published:
Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Abstract

Disease state management (DSM) is a new concept in healthcare which is rapidly growing in terms of interest and potential as an effective approach to improving patient outcomes. The term DSM refers to a ‘systematic population-based approach to identify persons at risk, intervene with specific programmes of care, and measure clinical and other outcomes.’ This alternative method for ‘managing care’ is being driven by an increased understanding of best practices coupled with new technologies for changing behaviour and measuring outcomes. The concept of health promotion coupled with a systems approach to healthcare could significantly improve clinical outcomes while reducing costs for many people with chronic diseases. This article describes the experience of one health plan with DSM. In addition, guidelines are presented to assist the reader in evaluating their own organisations’s ability and needs regarding disease management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DM sages see year of progress, growth, consolidation. Dis Manage News 1999 Jan 10; 4 (6): 1-6

  2. A continuum of care — disease management of diabetes. Technologica 1997 Mar: 1-6

  3. Marwick D. Another health care idea: disease management. JAMA 1995 Nov 8; 274(18): 1416–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter DJ, Fairfield G. Disease management. BMJ 1997 Jul 5; 315: 50–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The promise of disease management. Boston (MA): The Boston Consulting Group, 1995

  6. Epstein RS, Sherwood LM. From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed. Ann Intern Med 1996 May 1; 124(9): 832–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris JM. Disease management: new wine in new bottles? Ann Intern Med 1996 May 1; 124(9): 838–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finch M. Information technology, best practices, and care management: part I. Managed Care Interface 1998 Nov: 96-8

  9. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care in the United States. Chicago (IL): American Hospital Publishing, 1998

  10. Bourassa MG, Gurnes’ O, Bangdiwala SI, et al. Natural history and patterns of current practice in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22(A Suppl.): 14A–19A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 669–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bodenheimer T. The American health care system: the movement for improved quality in health care. N Engl J Med 1999 Feb 11; 340(6): 488–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Solberg LI, Brekke ML, Kottke TE. How important are clinician and nurse attitudes to the delivery of clinical preventive services? J Fam Pract 1997 May; 44(5): 451–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Legorreta AP, Christian-Herman J, O’Connor RD, et al. Compliance with national asthma management guidelines and specialty care. Arch Intern Med 1998 Mar 9; 158: 457–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. DeBusk RF, Miller NH, Superko HR, et al. Acase-management system for coronary risk factor modification after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120; 721–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mark DB. Economics of treating heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997 Oct 30; 80(8B): 33H–38H

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. The Boston Consulting Group. The promise of disease management. Boston (MA): The Boston Consulting Group, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marwick D. Another healthcare idea: disease management. JAMA 1995; 274(18): 1416–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. National Health Information. Disease management: a special report. Marietta (GA): National Health Information, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers A, Entwistle V, Pencheon D. A patient led NHS: managing demand at the interface between lay and primary care. BMJ 1998 Jun 13; 316: 1816–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pencheon D. NHS direct: managing demand. BMJ 1998 Jan 17; 316: 215–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barish J, Breiner K, Fetterolf D, et al. The highmark pegasus project report: characteristics of highly successful health plans. Best Practices and Benchmarking in Healthcare 1997 May/Jun; 2(3): 112–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuller MG. A new day: strategies for managing psychiatric and substance abuse benefits. Health Care Manage Rev 1994 Fall; 19(4): 20–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ploucher DW. Disease management. In: Kongstvedt PR, editor. Essentials of managed health care. 2nd ed. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen Publishers, 1997: 225–36

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moore DL. Disease management initiatives in womens’s health. J Womens Health 1997; 6(1): 23–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. LaPensee KT. Pricing specialty carve-outs and disease management programs under managed care. Managed Care Q 1997 Spring; 5(2): 10–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gove S. Integrated management of childhood illness by outpatient health workers: technical basis and overview. Bull World Health Organ 1997; 75(1 Suppl.): 7–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. LaVigne M, Tapper KA. Interactive voice response in disease management: providing patient outreach and improving outcomes. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 1998 Jul; 4(1): 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fries JF, Koop CE, Sokolov J, et al. Beyond health promotion: reducing need and demand for medical care. Health Aff 1998 Mar/Apr; 17(2): 70–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark G. Fuller MD, FACP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuller, M.G. Disease State Management Programmes. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 6, 29–36 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906010-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-199906010-00004

Keywords

Navigation